Page: |
Home > Technical Chat > VE of an A Series | |||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 11:41:36am
Has anyone measured / worked it out?
AlexF |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Jul, 2007 at 11:46:55am
I always assume 82%.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 11:48:28am
that low :oO AlexF |
||||||
![]() 6549 Posts Member #: 1149 #1 Basshunter Fan Force Racing ICT Dept Manager Miglia Turbo Am frum Yokshyer tha noes! |
19th Jul, 2007 at 01:24:02pm
VE? 1/4 Mile 14.3secs 96Mph Terminal 10psi of boost.
|
||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 01:40:57pm
Volumetric Efficiency
AlexF |
||||||
Forum Mod 10980 Posts Member #: 17 ***16*** SouthPark, Colorado |
19th Jul, 2007 at 01:48:38pm
When looking at compressor maps - I also use 82%, but review 80-84% to check if this takes anything to the edge. It is all pretty much pie in the sky anyways - as the valve sizes, CR, cam timing, etc are variables. It's deffo not over 84% though LOL On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY |
||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 01:56:50pm
Reason for asking was exactly as TD says.... looking at Compressor Maps...
AlexF |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Jul, 2007 at 02:20:31pm
Calculation of the air flow is down to the engine capacity and revs, plus three efficiencies: VE, compressor and intercooler.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
19th Jul, 2007 at 02:24:28pm
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Jul, 2007 at 02:28:37pm
This is a print of my spreadsheet. I just change the numbers in red.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 02:29:00pm
96% VE
AlexF |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Jul, 2007 at 02:41:50pm
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:29pm AlexF2003 said:
96% VE and an intake of 104 degrees?!?!? yikes! Alex Have to agree, some strange numbers there. This is how I would calc Robert's setup. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Jul, 2007 at 02:51:00pm
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:24pm robert said:
running 9.5 psi and 150 bhp squirrel software,stepping up ve till i get to my bhp/psi level. crude software ,but interesting -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Engine RPM: 1000 1500 2250 3000 4800 6600 6750 6900 Vol Efficency: 88 89 89 89 93 96 92 87 Intake Temp: 64 65 73 80 92 104 104 104 Expected Boost (psi): 0 1 5.4 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 Pressure Ratio: 1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Airflow (lb/min): 1.5 2.5 4.7 7.5 12.2 16.5 16.5 16.1 Airflow (cfm): 22 36 68 108 176 239 240 233 Airflow (m^3/min): 0.63 1.01 1.91 3.07 4.99 6.77 6.79 6.6 Airflow (m^3/sec): 0.01 0.017 0.032 0.051 0.083 0.113 0.113 0.11 Airflow (kg/sec): 0.012 0.019 0.035 0.056 0.092 0.125 0.125 You are using a high VE to compensate for the high inlet temp. Allowing for an intercooler and bringing the VE down will give you the same answers. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 03:01:45pm
what would you make of a someone running more like 250bhp on a 1293cc?
AlexF |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Jul, 2007 at 03:04:04pm
I would assume that they have managed to find an efficient turbo at 3:1 PR.
Edited by Paul S on 19th Jul, 2007. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
19th Jul, 2007 at 03:04:55pm
indeed, i've been wondering what the VE will be on a K1100 lump, or a 7 port for that matter,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:18:55pm
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:29pm AlexF2003 said:
96% VE and an intake of 104 degrees?!?!? yikes! Alex degrees f lol Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:20:20pm
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 03:04pm Axel said:
I would assume that they have managed to find an efficient turbo at 3:1 PR. who? The GT1752 will do it (in theory). Edited by robert on 19th Jul, 2007. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 8297 Posts Member #: 408 Turbo Love Palace Fool Aylesbury |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:30:17pm
Thats a damn efficient intercooler...it wouldn't be Nics by any chance. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel
|
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:30:47pm
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:51pm Axel said:
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:24pm robert said:
running 9.5 psi and 150 bhp squirrel software,stepping up ve till i get to my bhp/psi level. crude software ,but interesting -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Engine RPM: 1000 1500 2250 3000 4800 6600 6750 6900 Vol Efficency: 88 89 89 89 93 96 92 87 Intake Temp: 64 65 73 80 92 104 104 104 Expected Boost (psi): 0 1 5.4 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 Pressure Ratio: 1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Airflow (lb/min): 1.5 2.5 4.7 7.5 12.2 16.5 16.5 16.1 Airflow (cfm): 22 36 68 108 176 239 240 233 Airflow (m^3/min): 0.63 1.01 1.91 3.07 4.99 6.77 6.79 6.6 Airflow (m^3/sec): 0.01 0.017 0.032 0.051 0.083 0.113 0.113 0.11 Airflow (kg/sec): 0.012 0.019 0.035 0.056 0.092 0.125 0.125 You are using a high VE to compensate for the high inlet temp. Allowing for an intercooler and bringing the VE down will give you the same answers. thats degrees f axel Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:39:11pm
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 03:04pm Axel said:
I would assume that they have managed to find an efficient turbo at 3:1 PR. The GT1752 will do it (in theory). I would have thought a GT28RS ![]() AlexF |
||||||
Forum Mod 10980 Posts Member #: 17 ***16*** SouthPark, Colorado |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:42:02pm
Degrees F?
On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:44:37pm
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 04:30pm robert said:
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:51pm Axel said:
On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:24pm robert said:
running 9.5 psi and 150 bhp squirrel software,stepping up ve till i get to my bhp/psi level. crude software ,but interesting -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Engine RPM: 1000 1500 2250 3000 4800 6600 6750 6900 Vol Efficency: 88 89 89 89 93 96 92 87 Intake Temp: 64 65 73 80 92 104 104 104 Expected Boost (psi): 0 1 5.4 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 Pressure Ratio: 1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Airflow (lb/min): 1.5 2.5 4.7 7.5 12.2 16.5 16.5 16.1 Airflow (cfm): 22 36 68 108 176 239 240 233 Airflow (m^3/min): 0.63 1.01 1.91 3.07 4.99 6.77 6.79 6.6 Airflow (m^3/sec): 0.01 0.017 0.032 0.051 0.083 0.113 0.113 0.11 Airflow (kg/sec): 0.012 0.019 0.035 0.056 0.092 0.125 0.125 You are using a high VE to compensate for the high inlet temp. Allowing for an intercooler and bringing the VE down will give you the same answers. thats degrees f axel Makes even less sense then. Inlet air at 40 deg C and a 1.7:1 PR and 96% VE should give far more than 150hp! EDIT: calculated 188hp at those figures. Edited by Paul S on 19th Jul, 2007. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:51:43pm
I bet Tom works in Kelvin :p
AlexF |
||||||
![]() 8297 Posts Member #: 408 Turbo Love Palace Fool Aylesbury |
19th Jul, 2007 at 04:52:28pm
Just a quick novice question..What kind of accuracy do you get with these formulaes + or - how many BHP? https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel
|
||||||
Home > Technical Chat > VE of an A Series | |||||||
|
Page: |