| Page: |
| Home > Technical Chat > final drive ratio choice - ideas please gents. | |||||||
![]() 89 Posts Member #: 7165 Advanced Member Solihull/Birmingham |
10th Feb, 2010 at 11:14:43pm
A pick your brains question. I need to decide what final drive to use for my project, basically supercharged about 150 bhp, 10 inch wheels with 165 70 10 tyres. Not a daily driver, just a weekend toy. Only likely to see a motorway on the odd run to a mini show. But I want it to be a nice drive, not just wanting to take off like a scolded cat all the time revving its nuts off. I have the standard turbo 3.2 at the moment in the box, but also have a 3.1. I don't mind buying other ratios if any others would be better. So the question is what ratio do you think I should go for. |
||||||
![]() 539 Posts Member #: 6807 Post Whore York |
10th Feb, 2010 at 11:22:37pm
I think a 3.1 would be very nice with that engine. I don't know if you've already seen this but check out the ratio calculator on johns site, it'll help you compare ratios. http://www.guess-works.com/Gearbox/Technical/ratio.htm |
||||||
|
280 Posts Member #: 4340 Senior Member sideways, Birmingham |
10th Feb, 2010 at 11:30:17pm
if it were me id go for the highest ratio you can get, supercharged motors seem to make lots of torque and dont like to rev too much.
On 15th Dec, 2009 fastcarl said:
sell the lot to me for £70 pounds and i'll let you stand on the outside edge and look on my inner circle of closest frinds, lol carl FOR EVERY WELL THOUGHT OUT AND WELL EXECUTED PRICISION JOB EVER CONCIEVED, YOU CAN GUARANTEE THAT SOMEWHERE IN WALSALL OR THE BLACK COUNTRY THERE WILL BE A BLOKE TRYING TO ACHIVE THE SAME BY MEANS OF "ITIN IT WI LUMP AMAR" |
||||||
![]() 1424 Posts Member #: 2810 Formally spanner181187 Dublin, Ireland |
11th Feb, 2010 at 01:30:23am
On 10th Feb, 2010 MONSTER HEDGEHOG said:
if it were me id go for the highest ratio you can get, supercharged motors seem to make lots of torque and dont like to rev too much. a highter ratio would mean you can take advantage of the torque plus your less likely to overstress the engine with revs but this is only my opinion, and im no expert Wouldn't that be a lower ratio? I would go for something like a 3.6 if you don't intend to do much motorway driving. I had a 3.4 with 165 70 10s on a motorway trip before. It would sit at 80 without making things too unbearable On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:
I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse ![]() On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best |
||||||
|
8215 Posts Member #: 90 Post Whore Somewhere around Swindon |
11th Feb, 2010 at 08:57:43am
i have 10's and a 3.44, i wish i had gone for a 3.2 or 3.1 as i think it revs to high on a run Crystal Sound Audio said:
Why wolfie...you should have your name as Fuckfaceshithead ! "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."-Douglas Adams |
||||||
![]() 10022 Posts Member #: 1456 Mongo Barnsley, South Flatcapshire |
11th Feb, 2010 at 09:08:13am
I've gone for 3.2 with 10's on my clubby. I would have put a 2.95 in there but I have metro challenge gearset which has a very long first. If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of. |
||||||
![]() 7765 Posts Member #: 74 I pick holes in everything.. Chief ancient post excavator |
11th Feb, 2010 at 09:17:25am
On 11th Feb, 2010 GaryOS said:
On 10th Feb, 2010 MONSTER HEDGEHOG said:
if it were me id go for the highest ratio you can get, supercharged motors seem to make lots of torque and dont like to rev too much. a highter ratio would mean you can take advantage of the torque plus your less likely to overstress the engine with revs but this is only my opinion, and im no expert Wouldn't that be a lower ratio? I would go for something like a 3.6 if you don't intend to do much motorway driving. I had a 3.4 with 165 70 10s on a motorway trip before. It would sit at 80 without making things too unbearable A 3,65 for a roadgoing car is mad. 3.44 is way much better, 3,21 even more so. A 2,76 is a TALL diff, whereas a 4,11 is a LOW diff. On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem. |
||||||
|
4309 Posts Member #: 1321 Post Whore Wiltshire |
11th Feb, 2010 at 09:21:38am
I'd go for the 3.2, or 3.1, deffinately no lower. Should give you about 120mph at 7k. Anything else in my opinion would be wasting the potential of the engine.
On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding |
||||||
|
493 Posts Member #: 3894 Senior Member sallys gap. garden of Ireland |
11th Feb, 2010 at 09:30:34am
I have 10's and 3.44 with sc drops on my daily. Its fun, but loud. Revs top out too early on the motorway, fun getting there though. im going to 3.2 id say next time the engine comes out. Just for some more legs, but i like the scalded cat bit !!!!! hhmmm
|
||||||
![]() 3329 Posts Member #: 184 Senior Member Melton Mowbray, Pie Country |
11th Feb, 2010 at 09:58:23am
On 11th Feb, 2010 Vegard said:
On 11th Feb, 2010 GaryOS said:
On 10th Feb, 2010 MONSTER HEDGEHOG said:
if it were me id go for the highest ratio you can get, supercharged motors seem to make lots of torque and dont like to rev too much. a highter ratio would mean you can take advantage of the torque plus your less likely to overstress the engine with revs but this is only my opinion, and im no expert Wouldn't that be a lower ratio? I would go for something like a 3.6 if you don't intend to do much motorway driving. I had a 3.4 with 165 70 10s on a motorway trip before. It would sit at 80 without making things too unbearable A 3,65 for a roadgoing car is mad. 3.44 is way much better, 3,21 even more so. A 2,76 is a TALL diff, whereas a 4,11 is a LOW diff. I totally agree. I had a 3.7 in my NA 998 and it was a pain, but good on track. 3.4 or taller on the road and taller the better on a forced induction http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
|
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
11th Feb, 2010 at 11:17:20am
Just leave the 3.2 in IMO Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
|
Site Admin ![]() 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
11th Feb, 2010 at 12:22:26pm
Dear god not another one of these topics. No offense to anyone, but really only YOU can decide what FD ratio to choose. One mans perfectly acceptable ratio is another mans pain in the arse, and that works for pretty much any number you choose.
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
![]() 3329 Posts Member #: 184 Senior Member Melton Mowbray, Pie Country |
11th Feb, 2010 at 12:28:37pm
I have to say that I was not going to comment on this thread for the above reason, but when someone recomends a 3.6 for a road forced induction car you have to say something. http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
|
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
11th Feb, 2010 at 06:16:51pm
On 11th Feb, 2010 Vegard said:
A 3,65 for a roadgoing car is mad. I must be raving looney then
On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
![]() 7765 Posts Member #: 74 I pick holes in everything.. Chief ancient post excavator |
11th Feb, 2010 at 06:55:19pm
On 11th Feb, 2010 Sprocket said:
On 11th Feb, 2010 Vegard said:
A 3,65 for a roadgoing car is mad. I must be raving looney then ![]() Yes. for a ROADgoing car, I see no point in using a 3.65. Trackday car, perfect! On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem. |
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
11th Feb, 2010 at 07:10:56pm
Lol, this is like the other topic
On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
|
8215 Posts Member #: 90 Post Whore Somewhere around Swindon |
11th Feb, 2010 at 07:19:00pm
road tax
On 11th Feb, 2010 Sprocket said:
Lol, this is like the other topic What makes a road going car not a track day car and a track day car not a road car? Edited by wolfie on 11th Feb, 2010. Crystal Sound Audio said:
Why wolfie...you should have your name as Fuckfaceshithead ! "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."-Douglas Adams |
||||||
|
Site Admin ![]() 15300 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
11th Feb, 2010 at 07:28:52pm
Yes and no, there are some that cross over more than others. For example my white 205 is a trackcar that has now developed to the point that its horrible to use on the road for any distance. OK its taxed and MOT'd but it is definitely more "track car" than it is "road car".
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
![]() 3756 Posts Member #: 1709 I like granny porn. LONDONSHIRE |
11th Feb, 2010 at 07:36:43pm
i cant stand my 3.4 on 10's im fitting a 2.9,
On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:
On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder. On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER) |
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
11th Feb, 2010 at 07:53:14pm
straight cut box 2.58 1st gear ..,3.2 ....helical box 2.9.
Edited by robert on 11th Feb, 2010. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 3756 Posts Member #: 1709 I like granny porn. LONDONSHIRE |
11th Feb, 2010 at 08:16:00pm
rob, what does that mean? On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:
On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder. On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER) |
||||||
![]() 89 Posts Member #: 7165 Advanced Member Solihull/Birmingham |
11th Feb, 2010 at 09:45:12pm
On 11th Feb, 2010 rubicon said:
rob, what does that mean? Cheers for that, yes I forgot to mention it's straight cut drops and box. I think after hearing what people think of their final drives I will stick with the 3.2. 1 ratio then. |
||||||
![]() 89 Posts Member #: 7165 Advanced Member Solihull/Birmingham |
11th Feb, 2010 at 09:47:09pm
On 11th Feb, 2010 Tom Fenton said:
Dear god not another one of these topics. No offense to anyone, but really only YOU can decide what FD ratio to choose. One mans perfectly acceptable ratio is another mans pain in the arse, and that works for pretty much any number you choose. If you really really hate the choice you do make, then its not a difficult thing to change it next time you have the engine and box out. Stay away from the extremes of either end of the scale, e.g. 4.1 and 2.7 and you won't go that far wrong with any of them for a road car. Sorry Tom ,fair comment if I had thought about doing search fo the topic I'd of had the answer, seems this had been a common question before. |
||||||
|
1641 Posts Member #: 178 Post Whore stowmaket suffolk |
12th Feb, 2010 at 09:21:37am
yep 3.2 or the 3.1 both will be good always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas |
||||||
![]() 7765 Posts Member #: 74 I pick holes in everything.. Chief ancient post excavator |
12th Feb, 2010 at 11:37:31am
On 11th Feb, 2010 robert said:
straight cut box 2.58 1st gear ..,3.2 ....helical box 2.9. editted to make it understandable for moz ...
if you have a gearbox with the straight cut teeth ,which has a 2.58:1 ratio 1 st gear ,thats the one you use to drive off from a standstill ,then i would advise advocate and utilise a differential gear ratio of 3.2:1. if you are using a standard unmodified helical box ,with a much lower 1st gear ,thats the one you pull away with ,then i would install,fit,emplace,a 2.95:1 ratio differential gear . This is very true. On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem. |
||||||
| Home > Technical Chat > final drive ratio choice - ideas please gents. | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |












...