Page:
Home > Technical Chat > Bernouli\'s steady flow energy equation

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Here's something to think about.

Bernouli's steady flow energy equation for compressible fluids:



Basically this says that there are three different components to the energy contained in a compressible fluid or gas at a constant temperature on the move.

The first is pressure as you would measure with the boost gauge.

The second is the velocity energy or kinetic energy. The E=mc2 bit.

The third is due to the elevation and gravitational acceleration.

We can forget the third one as there is little going on in the inlet manifold in terms of change in elevation.

So, the air in port has energy due to pressure and velocity. When that air reaches the cylinder and stops, the energy that was due to velocity doesn't just dissapear because it can't.

What happens is that the velocity energy is converted to pressure energy. So the resultant pressure in the cylinder is higher than the indicated boost pressure.

This is in addition to any "inertia" or "ram" type effects and it is nothing to due with pulse tuning either.

Chew on that :)

Edited by Paul S on 25th Oct, 2010.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Chewing.... But it tastes salty. Will report back later.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Star Mag

User Avatar

1745 Posts
Member #: 375
Post Whore

Leicestershire

Tastes like chicken


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 22nd Oct, 2010 Paul S said:
The second is the velocity energy or kinetic energy. The E=mc2 bit.

On 22nd Oct, 2010 Paul S said:

Chew on that :)


I nearly choked *happy*

Whilst your original equation is true (so far as I can remember), E=mc^2 is nuclear physics, "m" being the difference in mass between atoms before/after a fission or fusion event in that equation.

You're thinking of e=1/2 mv^2 which is a completey different "m" *happy*

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Rod, you are correct. Just testing :)

Of course if you measure boost in a large plenum, then this does not apply as much as if you are measuring boost from the inlet manifold.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

monkeying


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 22nd Oct, 2010 fab said:
monkeying


I think that loosely translates to "ridiculous" *happy*

I've just done some calculations and the numbers are so significant that I can hardly believe them.

Rather than make a fool of myself, anyone care to check my calcs by PM?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

Monkeing is abit like aping, a lot more amicaly.
You cannot handle/calc this as easily;

you 've just lighted why the inlet valve need to close later than bdc, their's still energy left in them from their acceleration created by the earlier vaccumed cylinder.




On 23rd Oct, 2010 Paul S said:

On 22nd Oct, 2010 fab said:
monkeying


I think that loosely translates to "ridiculous" *happy*

I've just done some calculations and the numbers are so significant that I can hardly believe them.

Rather than make a fool of myself, anyone care to check my calcs by PM?


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 23rd Oct, 2010 fab said:

you 've just lighted why the inlet valve need to close later than bdc, their's still energy left in them from their acceleration created by the earlier vaccumed cylinder.


Fab, this is about how you measure boost. It is independant of mass flow - there is no "m" value in the above equation, although I did confuse the issue.

The inertia that fills the cylinder after BDC is due to inertia derived from mv2/2 which does take account of the mass flow in the port.

If you do a dimensional analysis of the equation ^^^ you get N/m2 for all three components, so i'm happy with the derivation of the original Bernouli formula which is far more complex.

The big problem is what port velocity to use as this varies from zero to near 200 m/s at peak. I'm taking 2.8cm as the port diameter, as this is the diameter of the MG Metro manifold port at the vacuum/boost take off.

At peak port velocity, on a 1293 at 7000rpm, then the actual boost at a measured boost of 15 psi could be as high as 22 psi! Reality check is that the average increase over the whole engine cycle is around 1 psi, but it depends how the boost gauge handles the pulses.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


wolfie

User Avatar

8215 Posts
Member #: 90
Post Whore

Somewhere around Swindon

i did my own energy equation
right foot over boost wound up + more fuel =more energy and forward motion *happy*

Thats about all i understand tbh

Crystal Sound Audio said:

Why wolfie...you should have your name as Fuckfaceshithead !


"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."-Douglas Adams


SumpNut
Forum Mod

User Avatar

1322 Posts
Member #: 28
Post Whore

Milton Keynes

I'm just pondering this from first principals, infact now I think about it am I even talking about the same thing? Anway here goes:

Is it this kinetic energy from velocity that creates wave pulses within the port?

For example, inlet charge is flowing at whatever velocity and pressure. The inlet valve slams shut, flowing gas at the on the very back of the valve stops, it has to. Pressure at this point right at the back of the valve rises and a ripple effect/pulse moves up the inlet tract due to more flowing fluid slamming into the stationary fluid and stopping.

Then of course the valve opens and the bugger gets straight into the cylinder to get down and dirty with the pistons etc.

Or maybe the kinetic energy from flow is changed to heat combined with the pressure wave?


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

No, this is simply the dynamics of the changing state of the internal energy of the inlet charge.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


mcalvert39

388 Posts
Member #: 442
Senior Member

Manchester

Suppose temperature of inlet charge will have an effect on this?


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

Everything come back down to the universal gas equation,
pv=mRT
or dynamically, p(v(dot)) = (m(dot))RT

The thing to bear in mind with temperature though is it's measured in degrees Kelvin in physics (and hence the above equations) so apparently large changes when you have a degrees centigrade mindset, are actually quite small.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

What the fuck are you talking about? You lost me

I seriously doubt it!


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 24th Oct, 2010 mcalvert39 said:
Suppose temperature of inlet charge will have an effect on this?


Yes, temperature affects the air density. I've used the density of air at 35 Deg C.

The point of trying to understand this is that it may explain the very high apparent VE figures needed to explain the high power outputs from relatively moderate boost levels.

It may also explain why indicated boost pressures appear to drop as the revs rise.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

good luck to explain these very high ve.. and i will stop there on this subject.

the pressure drop as rev rise is achieved by the restrictor.
these boost pressure are mesured :after carb restrictor, and when you restrict an air flow it'll loose pressure cqfd,
Mesure pressure drop thru the turbo carb/restrictor, then you'll know why I'm competely suspiscious about the mesured numbers.

I'm building the twin set up with pitot tube for a good reason.

On 24th Oct, 2010 Paul S said:

On 24th Oct, 2010 mcalvert39 said:
Suppose temperature of inlet charge will have an effect on this?


Yes, temperature affects the air density. I've used the density of air at 35 Deg C.

The point of trying to understand this is that it may explain the very high apparent VE figures needed to explain the high power outputs from relatively moderate boost levels.

It may also explain why indicated boost pressures appear to drop as the revs rise.


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

If it can help Tdave mesured these years ago:
restrictor is flowing 120cfm,
mety manifold 90cfm.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 25th Oct, 2010 fab said:
If it can help Tdave mesured these years ago:
restrictor is flowing 120cfm,
mety manifold 90cfm.


They are just points on a square law curve and meaningless without the associated pressure drop. I'm sure TD would have used 25" water and atmospheic at the inlet.

Put boost into the equation and consider it in terms of velocity and mass flow, then you gan get more than enough air flow for 200hp.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 25th Oct, 2010 fab said:
the pressure drop as rev rise is achieved by the restrictor.
these boost pressure are mesured :after carb restrictor, and when you restrict an air flow it'll loose pressure cqfd,
Mesure pressure drop thru the turbo carb/restrictor, then you'll know why I'm competely suspiscious about the mesured numbers.


There is a pressure drop through the carb and restrictor, but what I'm talking about is how the pressure is measured after that.

The same principles apply to aircraft wings. if you measure the pressure on the top and bottom of an aircraft wing in flight, you get a big difference due to the velocity difference. It's this that lifts the plane of the ground.

Nothing to do with pressure loss, inertia or pulses.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Mr Joshua

2496 Posts
Member #: 1954
Post Whore

Luton Bedfordshire

So what about the heat? The kinetic energy may very well convert to pressure energy but where you affect one you affect another for the temperature to remain the same whit a decrease in velocity and incread in pressure does not the density have to change or are you suggesting a perfect trade off with pressure and velocity?

Own the day


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/fluids/bernoul.htm

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

Would you agree if i'm using a bit of the brandnew scotch band now???

*wink* Andy
*happy*


best_stig

User Avatar

453 Posts
Member #: 6449
Senior Member

Brisbane, Australia

They tried to teach me that at uni. So i dropped out.

In boost we trust


turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

The very fact that woodsie was getting well over 200hp eight years ago, using the restrictor, and a T3 turbo, (don't know what he's up to now though) should point that it's a whole different game with boost.
Only reason I did the flow-measurement was to compare the Metro restrictor tube to a plain hole (which as we know never worked out in reality).




On 25th Oct, 2010 Paul S said:

On 25th Oct, 2010 fab said:
If it can help Tdave mesured these years ago:
restrictor is flowing 120cfm,
mety manifold 90cfm.


They are just points on a square law curve and meaningless without the associated pressure drop. I'm sure TD would have used 25" water and atmospheic at the inlet.

Put boost into the equation and consider it in terms of velocity and mass flow, then you gan get more than enough air flow for 200hp.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY


Home > Technical Chat > Bernouli\'s steady flow energy equation
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: