Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Electronic distance measurement - how ?

Alex

User Avatar

690 Posts
Member #: 1851
Post Whore

Woolavington, Zummerzet

I want to measure the distance something is moving vertically in real time over a distance of about 50-60mm and it has to be accurate ±0.25mm. I can't attach anything too heavy to the object, and it does vary it's height quite quickly in an irregular manner.
I don't think I can do it with a laser or optically with an off the shelf product, so I'm open to suggestions.

Metric is for people who can't do fractions.


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

I'm thinking Linear potentiometer?

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Aubrey_Boy

User Avatar

690 Posts
Member #: 9962
Post Whore

Yep, me too linear pot is made for this, if you need to you can just measure / log the raw voltage and post process it into a distance after.


Alex

User Avatar

690 Posts
Member #: 1851
Post Whore

Woolavington, Zummerzet

Can a linear pot be small and light enough to sit on an SU piston without upsetting the spring balance ?

Metric is for people who can't do fractions.


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/RANGE-ROVER-P38-...=item259892d754

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Aubrey_Boy

User Avatar

690 Posts
Member #: 9962
Post Whore

I have mainly used Penny and Giles displacement sensors, here's a useful link;

http://www.pennyandgiles.com/Products/Line...on-Sensors.aspx

It shows everything they do

To be light enough to measure a dashpot without upsetting it, I don't know?, linear pots can be a bit inconsistent on how 'stiff' they are throughout the range of travel. I've used LVDTs and string pots when I wanted something lightweight but string pots are good in tension but you have to be a bit careful in contraction as they sometimes can't keep up if the movement is too fast.

LVDT's are none contact so less force / drag involved, but expensive and needs special post processing as AC output

Penny and Giles have PDF spec sheets for all the sensors they do which will quote the force required to move the sensor

I haven't used the specific one Joe linked to above but a lot of the OEM ride height sensors are pretty poor resolution and you need to be sure they have an analogue output and not CAN unless you can deal with / decode the output.

My guess is cost will be the problem as most decent linear pots are around £200 to start


Alex

User Avatar

690 Posts
Member #: 1851
Post Whore

Woolavington, Zummerzet

I've been doing some looking on the interweb based around the linear pot idea, and am now wondering if a Hall Effect position sensor would work.

Small magnetic rod in place of, or alongside, the damper with the sensor on the top of the carb.

Metric is for people who can't do fractions.


metroturbo

806 Posts
Member #: 989
Post Whore

North Yorkshire

An eddy current position sensor will measure the distance you require with the accuracy you require, and is non contact, but will be more expensive than a linear pot.

LVDTs aren't fully non contact. They need connecting to what you are measuring in exactly the same way as a linear pot would, although there will be less drag.


stevieturbo

3594 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland

Would a visual do ? ie place a camera watching the piston ?

Shane T offers these wastegate actuators, which are doing more or less what you describe. Not sure what the actual sensor is, or how it connects internally. A Wastegate wouldnt move quite as much as an SU piston though.

But you could weld up or even epoxy the top of an SU dashpot and make something with the right sensor

http://www.fastmotorsports.com/products/ef.../wastegates.htm

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


stevieturbo

3594 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland

Turbosmart are now offering the same, and list a part number for a sensor

http://www.turbosmart.com.au/news/knowledg...gate-sensor-cap

Sensor

http://www.turbosmartdirect.com/Product-Ca...ion-Sensor.html

http://www.turbosmartdirect.com/Product-Ca...ensor-Plug.html

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland

those sensors (or ones almost identical) are standard fit to wastegates on some of the newer HDi engines

http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_cqr=true...position+sensor

pretty sure they are even cheaper from peugeot. not quite got the stroke you need tho.

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

Are you trying to do something similar to brett... (photo of linear pot on 3rd page)

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...id=159683&fr=50


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

Is this really simpler than EFI?

http://www.jbperf.com/


Alex

User Avatar

690 Posts
Member #: 1851
Post Whore

Woolavington, Zummerzet

Nothing's new is it.

The sliding pot was my first idea (already tried it seems) and a hall effect sensor poking through the dashpot was my second plan...(also tried).

Third plan is to use a plastic strip with an optical pickup as suggested elsewhere.
http://www.usdigital.com/products/encoders...ntal/linear/LIN
http://www.usdigital.com/products/encoders...tal/modules/em1

Metric is for people who can't do fractions.


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

Sound like it, i have 2 versions one that screws ontop of the damper is good for moving from car to car

And one that is internal and can be kept on the car

I data logged the needle position through megasquirt,

Page 19 of my build thread has some pictures

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...d=265648&fr=450

Edited by Brett on 7th Dec, 2014.

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


stevieturbo

3594 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland




On 7th Dec, 2014 evolotion said:
those sensors (or ones almost identical) are standard fit to wastegates on some of the newer HDi engines

http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_cqr=true...position+sensor

pretty sure they are even cheaper from peugeot. not quite got the stroke you need tho.


Handy to know though. Seems they're on quite a few cars.

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 7th Dec, 2014 jbelanger said:
Is this really simpler than EFI?


That depends several factors

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

On 7th Dec, 2014 Alex said:
Third plan is to use a plastic strip with an optical pickup as suggested elsewhere.

You could print a gradient on a strip of projector transparancy and attach to the piston, then pass this through a slotted optical sensor. It should produce a similar output, but without the 'mechanical noise' of a potentiometer and linkages.

Edited by PhilR on 8th Dec, 2014.


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 7th Dec, 2014 Alex said:
I've been doing some looking on the interweb based around the linear pot idea, and am now wondering if a Hall Effect position sensor would work.

Small magnetic rod in place of, or alongside, the damper with the sensor on the top of the carb.


on some of our machines we use an analog device in a float sensor to measure fluid level inside the machine, from the outside. The basic principle is a circuit of parallel reed switches and series resistors such that the output is similar to a linear potentiometer but without any physical contact with anything. Obviously there needs to be a magnet attached to the moving device.

It might be possible to place a magnet on the top side of the piston inside the dashpot with the sensor on the outside and place the reed switches in the same divisions as the SU needle data. A direct comparison............

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk


On 7th Dec, 2014 Alex said:
I don't think I can do it with a laser or optically with an off the shelf product, so I'm open to suggestions.

I'd suggest ultrasonics or infrared.
It's not going to be entirely "off the shelf" to fit to an SU but there are pleny of cheap modules (UT or IR) for interfacing with arduino, Raspberry Pi etc that could be modified to fit - IR probably easier as the sensors are smaller.
As for accuracy, IMO should be fine if you calibrate against physical measurement.
The IR autofocus on my fairly basic camera does the macro lens accurately at 2cm.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland

another option is to use the linear encoder from a cheap vernier calliper. most have a serial output, and again can be interfaced to an arduino or similar.

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

A typical hobbyist IR setup

http://imall.iteadstudio.com/electronic-co...m130619002.html

Drill two holes in the top of the suction chamber offset to clear the dashpot and mount this on two 50-60mm black plastic tubes (to meet its minimum distance requirements) glued/sealed at both ends and paint the top of the piston white.

Analogue output and very linear over your range - see datasheet page 5

ftp://imall.iteadstudio.com/Sensor/IM1306...ring_Sensor.pdf

There are probably lots more suitable, this just happens to be sold by the company that makes my printed circuit boards as they do a lot of arduino stuff as well as PCBs (but you wouldn't even need an arduino as this one is analogue).

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

That's pretty cool. You could make it permanent and keep the damper in place and not interfere with the piston movement.

It might be trickier to set up, but I'm tempted to try this myself - even though I've got no projects with carbs

EDIT: just thought, my bike has carbs!

Edited by PhilR on 9th Dec, 2014.


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

Another idea: Could you use a MAP sensor to measure the pressure inside the dashpot, then infer the piston height from that?


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 9th Dec, 2014 PhilR said:
Another idea: Could you use a MAP sensor to measure the pressure inside the dashpot, then infer the piston height from that?

No, because - and I do still remember how a museum piece like the SU works *happy* - the partial vacuum in the venturi area is transferred to above the chamber piston hence why, in a normally aspirated engine, it's called a constant venturi. Same applies boosted. The pressure above the piston should be a measure of flow not height.
Plus the damper would skew the pressure/height ratio under load changes.
The dashpot itself is vented to atmosphere at the top, the size of the hole being one of the things that determines the rate of rise.

A quick bit of maths says, assuming a 10bit ADC on your logger/weapon of choice, you could get a 0.295mm resolution from that particular IR setup and as it's so linear in this particular working range you would probably only have to calibrate at a very few points.

I'm sure there are lots better but for US$10 plus postage and a couple of bits of plastic tube, If I had a carb, I'd give it a go.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Electronic distance measurement - how ?
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: