Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > measuring head volume. added more pics... @24.5 cc now.

Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

hy. been grinding somewhat on my cilinder head. i used to measure volume of the chambers by putting a plate on it that i closed up with grease and filling the chambers with liquid trough a hole in the plate. like that i could read how many cc of water went into it.

is there a different more accrued technique that can be performed at home for this?

greets

Edited by Rammie2000 on 21st Mar, 2016.

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


jonny f

User Avatar

2096 Posts
Member #: 9894
Post Whore

Dorking

Not that I'm aware of. I use that technique.


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

What you're already doing is fine and accurate.

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

Okey chears.

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

I do it like that. Try with the head at an angle with the hole at the top. Also add a drop of washing up liquid.


jonny f

User Avatar

2096 Posts
Member #: 9894
Post Whore

Dorking

I have used thinners makes it easier.


Sir Yun

User Avatar

510 Posts
Member #: 1592
Smart Guy!

mainland europe near ze germans

You can do it without a plate if you set the head dead level and use alcohol (spritus, vodka). Has less surface tension than water and does not form as big a bulge and you can eyeball it fine. Imho easier, less messy and more repeatable.

Water causes rust , thinner does not but unkike vodka you can't really drink it

Edited by Sir Yun on 14th Mar, 2016.

That sir, is not rust, it is the progressive mass reduction system

http://aseriesmodifications.wordpress.com/


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

why washing up liquid?


On 14th Mar, 2016 PhilR said:
I do it like that. Try with the head at an angle with the hole at the top. Also add a drop of washing up liquid.

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium



On 14th Mar, 2016 Sir Yun said:
You can do it without a plate if you set the head dead level and use alcohol (spritus, vodka). Has less surface tension than water and does not form as big a bulge and you can eyeball it fine. Imho easier, less messy and more repeatable.

Water causes rust , thinner does not but unkike vodka you can't really drink it


i rather drink the vodka.....

On 14th Mar, 2016 jonny f said:
I have used thinners makes it easier.


what makes it easier with thinners?

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


slater

User Avatar

1030 Posts
Member #: 1291
Post Whore

Suffolk / Birmingham

No one uses water! Use diesel.


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

If you're just measuring into an open, level chamber I agree that water is a daft choice. Thinners (or diesel) lie flatter in the chamber so its easier to see when you've reached the top.

But with a plate, that's irrelevant. Having tried both, I find that solvents wash away the grease sealing the plate after a few measurements and it's all just less of a mess to clean up with water.


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

My toughts to phill.
Tryed diesel yesterday open chambre and went well... with only one downside wich probebly had more to do with the spout then the diesel but the diesel got out the spout faster then i puched to drip it in the chambre leaving an air pocket. East solved by turning it up and puching air out but makes doubt of the accuracy ( although it came out nearly the same ( 0.5 cc difference )

The water is easy because i colour it in with ink.

Now. Did make me see a problem... when i mesured it before bringing it into the workshop to flatten it it had 21.8 cc in a standard cambre... i started working on one cambre and after i big peace that was grinded away i mesured that one... now makes 21.5 cc! So mesured an untouched chambre again. Seem that the machine chop took it of a but much because they now make 18.5 cc

Ill post a pick. Lett me know if i can go further and if posible ... what direction.

Greets

Edited by Rammie2000 on 16th Mar, 2016.

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium



So far went back on the rear side of the head quit a bit but... need another 4 to 5 cc to get it under 8.5 compression ratio.

Edited by Rammie2000 on 16th Mar, 2016.

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

How much did you ask them to cut? Before you grind any more, measure the total head thickness at all 4 corners to make sure it hasn't been cut on a slant. I've had 2 different shops clamp heads down onto the valve guides, so weren't flat. It should be fairly obvious if they're paying attention, but they both just cut deep enough to hide the mistake.

Edited by PhilR on 16th Mar, 2016.


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

Its 69.16 mm all round so there we are good. Cant remember how much it was before. I asked the to cut minimal.

Can i go further shaping this or make it a bit deeper ( note i only have a dremmel tool and a shit load of paciance and a steady hand to make this)

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

Standard head is 2.750" tall so it's lost around 0.69mm; maybe already skimmed before you had it?

Its deffinately not ideal but IMO I think you can get to your target.

I'd say its best to do your 1st heads with a dremel, slowly. Get a set or carbide burrs if you haven't already, and leave the stones for finishing. Get the router attachment that holds it at 90 degrees and a constant depth so you can level the chamber roof safely (cut a square of perspex to rest on so it doesn't fall into the chamber). Cut down to the valve seats but I wouldn't be tempted to go deeper tbh.

Edited by PhilR on 16th Mar, 2016.


slater

User Avatar

1030 Posts
Member #: 1291
Post Whore

Suffolk / Birmingham





Not sure if these will help you.

Edited by slater on 16th Mar, 2016.


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

thnx did they work well opend up to the front?

i tought on using really crude paste on the valves and lap them in till they sinc in a bit and then deepen out the chambers to

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

Rammie, don't grind the valves. It takes forever, and after a very short time, both surfaces will become concave, which you'll have to correct (even though they'll seal).

Try to leave the 'beak' at the back if possible and take away metal from either side of the spark plug instead. You can grind the beak out if you need to, but if you try to put the spark plug closer to the centre of the new chamber then that could burn the entire mixture slightly quicker, and hopefully require less ignition advance.

Edited by PhilR on 16th Mar, 2016.


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

interesting. well part of the beak is gone at the top from that first one so will need to do simular to the rest. but it is stil mostly there on the bottom. can take slightly more of it away at the inlet valve so it becomes more like a beak shape there. and take the rest to the front.

thnx for the tips and advise. ill ad pics as i go with it.

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

For measuring the chambers drill two holes in the Perspex plate you're sticking to the face, one to fill through, the other should be towards the outer edge of the chamber. Now when you fill the chamber the air has the other hole to escape from allowing a consistent and accurate result. As above, water is fine when doing this method. Other liquids such as thinners will dissolve the grease holding your Perspex in place and render your results useless.
What's the current chamber size now you've modified it, as in the picture above ?
It is possible to go deeper in the chamber but you do start to lose the short side radius, not good for low lift flow.

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

Also you must have the patience of a saint if you're doing all that with a Dremel !

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

i use the perpex methode. the left chambre is modded as it is now. ill make it bigger to the spark plug site.

and yes when it comes to engines i have the patience of a saint on valium.



On 16th Mar, 2016 Turbo Phil said:
For measuring the chambers drill two holes in the Perspex plate you're sticking to the face, one to fill through, the other should be towards the outer edge of the chamber. Now when you fill the chamber the air has the other hole to escape from allowing a consistent and accurate result. As above, water is fine when doing this method. Other liquids such as thinners will dissolve the grease holding your Perspex in place and render your results useless.
What's the current chamber size now you've modified it, as in the picture above ?
It is possible to go deeper in the chamber but you do start to lose the short side radius, not good for low lift flow.

Phil.

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


PhilR

User Avatar

696 Posts
Member #: 10034
Post Whore

Birmingham

For the beak, I suspect you may have to carve it out to get the cc you want, so not to worry if that's the case. The last head I did, I completely cut I out.

Zoom into Turbo Phil's avatar to see where he's cut both sides of the spark plug, which helps puts the spark plug a bit closer to the centre of the fuel mixture. (also, no beak).


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium



So this is where i am in 1 hour of grinding fun. At 23 cc now. 2 more 2 go... although. .. might be needing another cc... stupid me.



I shot out. Never had this before but having the flu and not concentrating... well no excuse. Its a dumb mistake!. Although not deep probably needs a very thin skim to get rid of that... costing me cc!

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > measuring head volume. added more pics... @24.5 cc now.
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: