Page:
Home > General Chat > 2.95 final drive

JT

User Avatar

2742 Posts
Member #: 637
Post Whore

Hertfordshire

hi

i have in my shed a 3.1 fd but im thinking of using a 2.95 final drive.
do you think it will still accelerate well with a 2.95 or will it be a bit to tall a fd?
or should i just use the 3.1 i have in my old 998 box?
what standerd minis or metros can i get a 2.95 crown wheel and pinion out of? (what number of teeth should be on each one?)
o and just so you know its for a road going turbo mini and i paln on using cr/sc gearbox.


your thoughts people please

cheers
josh

My build thread..

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=542985


Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

i use a 3.2 diff with a c/r s/c box and 10" wheels. 1st is a little long when at tickover in traffic and when lifting the clutch in 1st. also 4th is a little short for road use as you can easily run out of revs.

it will all depend on the power of your car, size of wheels, amount of motorway use, your preffered cruising speed and revs etc, but the final drive is always a problem.

In the end the difference between a 3.1 and a 2.9 is small so i would use the one you have. you will be limited to cruising at about 80mph ish and max speed aroung 130mph. you should also be able to do 40+ in first.


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

yup i'd agree with that. i'm running a 3.1 on 10" wheels with a clubman gearset.

the long 1st does make driving a lot nicer, but hill starts can be a bit harsh. I've also found myself hitting the limiter in 4th a few times aswell.

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

"the long 1st does make driving a lot nicer, but hill starts can be a bit harsh. I've also found myself hitting the limiter in 4th a few times aswell. "

just not on the public roads officer!!!!


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

of course not...never been over 70 on the queens highway officer

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

Whats a 'Queens Highway Officer'

Ive heard of Highways Agency Officers but never one of those *wink*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


JT

User Avatar

2742 Posts
Member #: 637
Post Whore

Hertfordshire

well using the gear calculator iv got:
3.1=113.6mph at 6200rpm
2.95=119.3mph at 6200rpm
on 10" wheels
would it be safer to rev it more than that or is that a bit too much?

cheers
josh

My build thread..

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=542985


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

my limiter is set at 6100, but thats purely because i've got a totally stock bottom end.

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


andeh

User Avatar

982 Posts
Member #: 97
Post Whore

Near Daventry, midlands

I have no idea what a stock bottom end can really cope with for long periods of time, but all NA MG enignes should happily rev to 6,500 in std form. Not sure how the larger/heavier turbo valves would handle this though, for valve bounce.


If it blows up dont blame me though! *laughing* I did used to rev mine, mg engine with a 276, to 6,750 all the time though with a stock bottom.

Edited by andeh on 29th Jun, 2006.

I've seen the future and tbh its Pie


JT

User Avatar

2742 Posts
Member #: 637
Post Whore

Hertfordshire

iwould rather have it so its a bit under reved than over reved if you know what i mean!
how does yours accelerate and cruse happily with the 3.1fd bud?

cheers
josh

My build thread..

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=542985


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

mine accelerates fine and i sit at aroud 3500rpm on the motorway with no problems.

It's made the car a lot nicer since i changed to a 3.1, the 3.44 used to really do me tits in on the motorway.

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

i run a 2.9 in mine, i like the diff, but yes first gear is a little to long for easy fast get aways, but it's nice for motorway work.

Edited by Miniwilliams on 30th Jun, 2006.

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


JT

User Avatar

2742 Posts
Member #: 637
Post Whore

Hertfordshire

i think ill just use the 3.1 then as i dont really use motoways alot (only to the shows in the summer if i have to!) and i can live with sitting at 70mph so that shouldnt be a proplem. im after somthing that will be good at the lights and suprise the odd chav etc but not to bad at crusing etc.
as i have one i may as well use it realy!
just out of interest what minis have the 2.95 fd as standerd?
cheers
josh

My build thread..

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=542985


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

i know the city E's had em, cant remember what else though.

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


andeh

User Avatar

982 Posts
Member #: 97
Post Whore

Near Daventry, midlands

not much i dont think, its certainly the only source i know of. I've been looking for a 2.95:1 for a long time now (not running a s/c c/r set in mine first time round.

Edited by andeh on 30th Jun, 2006.

I've seen the future and tbh its Pie


Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

i think it was only the city E that had the 2.9 diff. but as shown above the 3.1 is so close.

as for revs you all seem to take it easy. standard mg metro engines rev to 7500 with no problems (way off the metro rev counter). max power on the turbo is normaly around 6000 so i set the limiter at 7000 and aim to change at 6500ish

wether your engine can take this is another question. if its standard with standard boost i would rev away. if standard but with 20psi of boost i would be very very careful!

and yes i can easily hit the limiter at 7000 revs.... hhmmmm.... how fast was that then?


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

i have to take mine easy, its my daily driver!

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


Jackman

User Avatar

695 Posts
Member #: 984
Post Whore

Westhoughton, Bolton

Would you guys say a 2.95 with SC is too much for a daily driver who does motorway trips, trying to work out if i should use my 2.95 diff on my turbo build or go for a shorter one.

Manchester Minis


Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

2.9 and 10" wheels is nice on the motorway but..

1st gear is the problem. when in slow traffic at tickover you end up catching up with the car in front and dipping the clutch all the time. also when pulling away you need to slip the clutch a lot to get going. as such the clutch does not last long.

option 2 is to fit say a 3.4 and when going on motorways fit 12" wheels with high profile tyres, but again you have the same problems if the traffic is slow


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

i run a 2.95 with 13 on 50 tyres with a challenge gearset

and i love it

the torque of the turbo just pulls it and you are not going up and down the box like a fiddlers elbow!

mind you thats my prefrence

it does sort the chavs out as well.....lol






JT

User Avatar

2742 Posts
Member #: 637
Post Whore

Hertfordshire

mine will be a daily driver just to let you know!
not sure what clutch to use (ill use a pre verto type i reckon!)

josh

My build thread..

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=542985


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

daily drive then depends on what you want

a good all rounder 3.2 FD with the standard turbo metro ratios

thats just my thinking though






jimmy

1300 Posts
Member #: 829
Post Whore

essex

what about 2.76 CWP on a turbo ??

1293 Turbo mini


andeh

User Avatar

982 Posts
Member #: 97
Post Whore

Near Daventry, midlands

it'd be fine if you used a std a+ box (not economy ratios), but you'd never get it to pull away or hill start with a s/c c/r box

I've seen the future and tbh its Pie


jimmy

1300 Posts
Member #: 829
Post Whore

essex

what if you are on 10s

1293 Turbo mini

Home > General Chat > 2.95 final drive
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: