Page:
Home > Technical Chat > 970cc K-Head Turbo Racer

wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I think so too. Think of it like this the 17 will make an easy 200bhp on a 2.0l engine at say 5 or 6 k. If you want to run at 10k then it will be operating in a similar region of the map.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

The bid advantage of the gt17 is his highflow turbine, the lack of corresponding compressor map is still a bit confusing,
anyway last gt comp wheel are very efficients, and a 52/38mm will have enough breath for 200 bhp .
I think Rob and wil engines prove this is a very good one.

ps: the gt17 thread should only be read tangentialy:
It is mainly a discution about the amount of power possibly produced by our beloved pushrod a-series. whatever said/argued in this are just words which just cannot be approved,just words,
the only judge is: chrono and that is someting we know:
Rob and Wil machines are certainliy scaring when it's Grenn light.


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

So whats the theoretical max power the GT17 will flow?

Chris


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

We don't know ,
just imagine something between 2052 52 trim and 2252 60 trim, but all is fogguy around his flow capacity,
One fact is:
saab switched from the gt1752 used on lpt 150 and 180 bhp to a td04 for the aero 210 hp model, certainly for one reason, and they have the maps.

The only map i plotted that is known and correspond to your flow/pressure is the rs4 turbocharger k04 025, don't de messed by the lightly lower efficiency as it is a trade between wheel size and flow, and this one will rev happily, lessening the boost effect



On 23rd Oct, 2010 01smartc said:
So whats the theoretical max power the GT17 will flow?

Chris


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Ok cool... I got my block today so tomorrow I can start playing!

Think im going to block it up for the 16v then do the undercrown jets first.

Ive ordered the oversize K-head valves form the states. They should be here in 3 weeks. (Better than the UK where the quickest lead time I could get was 14 weeks!) Quite expensive at £29 per valve!

Ive also sent the cams off to be measured and a new design come up with for the cam adapters. I'm having them made in billet with the cam adapter already built in so the pulleys just slide straight on :)

Just trying to decide on Pistons. MED 16v Cast Omega's, forged Omega's then do the cut-outs myself or Cosworth?

Chris


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

why not sleeve your bloc and use bimmer pistons?


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

? what size are they?


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

70.5 diameter
18mm pin
24mm deck height


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

weight: 260g with rings and pin


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Suitable for turbo? Probs not?


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

they do look strong and are made by mahle


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Think i'm going to stick to omega's I think.

Concentrate all my effort and budget elsewhere.

Chris


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Ok.. got my BMW oil jets. Will do that tonight.

What compression do you lot recommend?

Chris


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

what's the cam profile, or rather what degrees does the inlet cam close...



On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Cams ar going to be custom, they have the origionals right now, measuring them up and then ive got to work with them to sort a profile that will work


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

I rekon 8.5?


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

Might be able to run higher, depends on what fuel your going to use as well as boost

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Have a read of this:

http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=359932

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Read that.. I think im going to be running more boost that that? I'm not sure.

Fuel is determinded by the rules as "pump fuel" so i'm guessing the best I can get is 102 octane.

Off boost drivability doesnt really make much difference to me, i'm not going to be off boost during the run.

So if I go with 8.5 I could run boost up to 20psi?

Intercooler wise I'm thinking front mounted with a CO2 spray. Just dump a load of Co2 on the start line to supercool the IC. Then the runs only take 60-70 seconds at most so hopefully the heatsink capabilitys of the IC that cold should mean my IC is pretty efficent?

Correct if I'm talkin bollocks?

Chris


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

8.5:1 is pretty usual for an 5 port iron head with a phase 2 cam or smilar,

the trouble is you are changing nearly all the characteristics of the engine,different bore & stroke, Different chamber shape, different flow charachteristics, different cams, different head material, different rev range ect....

what i was alluding to is your cams and the change in bore, stroke and rod length are going to affect the dynamic CR significantly, first thing i would do is work out the dynaminc cr on a typical turbo A series then work it out for yours.

http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/comprAdvBMW.htm

I assume that you are going to end up with cams getting on for around 280 deg, if so I'm GUESSING 9.5:1 static is going to be closer to what you need

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

What dynamic CR should I be aiming for?

Chris


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

mine is about 6.6:1

http://www.not2fast.com/turbo/compression/compression.shtml

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Mine comes out at 8.23:1

Hows that?


Ben H

User Avatar

3329 Posts
Member #: 184
Senior Member

Melton Mowbray, Pie Country

Have you ever competed in a hillclimb or sprint?


On 30th Oct, 2010 01smartc said:
Read that.. I think im going to be running more boost that that? I'm not sure.

Fuel is determinded by the rules as "pump fuel" so i'm guessing the best I can get is 102 octane.

Off boost drivability doesnt really make much difference to me, i'm not going to be off boost during the run.

So if I go with 8.5 I could run boost up to 20psi?

Intercooler wise I'm thinking front mounted with a CO2 spray. Just dump a load of Co2 on the start line to supercool the IC. Then the runs only take 60-70 seconds at most so hopefully the heatsink capabilitys of the IC that cold should mean my IC is pretty efficent?

Correct if I'm talkin bollocks?

Chris

http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp

A man without a project is like a like a woman without a shopping list.


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Yer a couple of seasons.. why?

Home > Technical Chat > 970cc K-Head Turbo Racer
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: