Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > The damage, what has caused this?

Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15302 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

I agree with your logic fab however the lads are running mapped ignition which alters ignition timing with respect to boost pressure as well as with respect to rpm, so even though the T2 will make boost sooner, the ignition is retarded as the boost rises.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


Ben H

User Avatar

3329 Posts
Member #: 184
Senior Member

Melton Mowbray, Pie Country

You have it right there Tom, but the ignition map was based on the T3 and I have now retsred the map at the 'coming on boost' stage so that it is earlier in the rev range. safe to say we will be sticking at 15psi boost for the rest of the season.

http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp

A man without a project is like a like a woman without a shopping list.


robert

User Avatar

6753 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

in this heat i think we all need a lie down pete, until you look at the states 42 degrees and upwards in the southern states urrrgggh

oh fab ,you cant compare two a/r nos from different design turbos ,they can only really be compared on the same model turbo eg a t3 .25 and a .36 . regards robert.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I've learn't a lot from this thread, hopfully we can stop it happening again.

Some very friendly local machine shops have have done me a massive favour and we should have the block back tomorrow. Then we'll put it all back together and, if all goes well, we'll be out racing on Saturday.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15302 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

Fingers crossed for you guys that you can have it fixed and back out for the next meeting, good luck!


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

retarding your ignition does up your EGTs thou...

But it shouldnt be a problem for a t2 or a t3 :)

Aled

AlexF


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

I had the same problem when I swapped the T2 on my best friend engine for an m45 blower. to began I kept the ignition curve as it was with the turbo (cr , cyl head etc being the same ), but after two first runs,I found lot of dets from 1700 to 3500 rpms, (before we were using an hybrid t2 with gt turbo cup specs which was coming really on at 3500 rpms), I didn't understood as I also though that the boost retard would correct the ignition curve, but in fact we had to retard the base map as much as 12° at some points (2500/3000). In fact after after discuting the trouble with a canadian dragster supercharged dragster specialist it seem that the boost increase the ve in such a margin that if you were setting your ingintion curve at a point which were not in the boost curve you had to correct the bad ve with lot of advance then if you are know charge your intake it completely reverse the process you now need a lot of less advance , the boost correction only help in a small margin , it can't correct a bad base map.
fab


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

About t2/t3 a/r
Robert I agree that they are two different turbos, but not that different in design the T2 being the small brother . the gt turbo t2 is really flowing more than the mg mety T3 his 0.35 a/r being smaller than a t3 0.35 a/r but it is really a quater bigger than the t3 0.25 a/r. I will not show the calcs etc because of time and it'll certainly be boring.But logically the gt turbo being a bigger capacity, with higher boost and higher power it's an evidence that his turbo can't be lower in flow than the mety T3.
best regards
fab


robert

User Avatar

6753 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

i think that what your missing fab is that the t2 was made a fair bit later than the t3 ,which has a huge great turbine wheel ,and was really a very bad design of turbo for the 4 psi 7 psi metro ,but was all that garrett had at that time to offer bl,and even if it had a a/r half the size of the t2 ,(which was designed to cater for the lower flow engines and subsiquently had a smaller turbine wheel and oulet and housing even thuogh its a/r may be a higher no) may well flow more that turbo simply due to the big diff in outlet size....
anyway ,its all moot !!
the best thing is to get some data from the car ,and then see ! regards robert

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

Again the same old problem rears its head!

Pressure is not a true indication of AIR FLOW!

17psi on a t3 is not the same quantity of air per second as a t2 at 17psi.

Hence the igniton curves are likly to be different for each turbo.

Alex

Edited by AlexF2003 on 21st Jul, 2006.

AlexF


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb


I'm not missing a lot of things about t2's and T3's I know which is the first , why bl had a t3 and not the t2, why the T2 came on etc etc , I also know the efficiency of both for a lot of revs /charges/capacity, can calc the best wheel comp trim , and make highflow hybrids.I just have tested a douzen of different T2/t25 wheel trim and a/r on the mety a seri.
but in fact you now agree that the T2 0.35 have a bigger flow than the t3 0.25. it's just what I said.


robert

User Avatar

6753 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

On 21/07/2006 08:46:03 robert said:

i think that what your missing fab is that the t2 was made a fair bit later than the t3 ,which has a huge great turbine wheel ,and was really a very bad design of turbo for the 4 psi 7 psi metro ,but was all that garrett had at that time to offer bl,and even if it had a a/r half the size of the t2 ,(which was designed to cater for the lower flow engines and subsiquently had a smaller turbine wheel and oulet and housing


and would or could flow less than the t3




even thuogh its a/r may be a higher no) may well flow more

than

that t2 turbo simply due to the big diff in outlet size....
anyway ,its all moot !!
the best thing is to get some data from the car ,and then see ! regards robert



iv added a few words to make my explanation clearer
i dont agree the t2 would deff flow more on the turbine side.but until data becomes available , in definate that im not definate which one flows more .*smiley*

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > The damage, what has caused this?
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: