Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > General Chat > BMW K100 8 valve flow figures

carl talbot

326 Posts
Member #: 1323
Senior Member

To go back to the comparison with the KAD head ,
my first generation [ early '90s ] had shed loads of mid range torque AND buckets of top end power

For those of you into figures :
1380cc ,big valve head , L14 cams , 176bhp , 126ft/lb

Real life :
Left a mega developed , ally blocked , 1398cc BD? gasping and covered in dust in the british hillclimb championship .

I've got the flow figures / graph on an original 1990 KAD brochure [ black and white print and photos in those days , how things have changed ! ]

I'll scan it when I get it back from the guy who is putting the figures onto one of those power prediction jobbies ,[ going to see what the heads potential is with different turbo options ]
I'll post it on head flow topic .


fastcarl

User Avatar

6965 Posts
Member #: 507
Fastest A Series Mini in the World

leeds/wakefield.

Peter Herbert is a gentlman racer though Carl.lol

WWW.FORCE-RACING.CO.UK PLEASE CLICK HERE


MadMatt

User Avatar

703 Posts
Member #: 105
1st to provide proof of a running Bimmy Conversion!

Brisbane ,Australia




On 15th Mar, 2009 johnK said:
Matt - I'm not sure of the point you are trying to make but those of us which go to the trouble and expense of getting a head flow tested know that full lift flow is not everything. JK


"THat" was my point John... Full lift figures are not the "Be all & end all",,,

i gather you may have felt like i was having a go at your flow bench figures??? I can assure you that i wasn`t meaning anything nastey , nor implying any "fudging" by it what so ever John ,,, & i mean that,,, Please don`t get upset, my only thoughts were to see what different figures we get, from different flow benches & a number of std heads,,, that would give us a "real-Life" comparison to work with when we compare these findings to others across the other side of the planet,,, that`s all

To define the "Std" ,,, not all flow benches read exactly the same, nor are they used exactly the same way,,, just the same as all the dynos in the world are not the same, nor are they used the same way,,, i am just gathering info to creat my own "std" to work with for my own comparisons, thats all mate,,, not attacking your integrity or professionalism at all mate,,, far from it,,, i actually applaude your (& everyones) time & efforts in this Twinky game, i really do.

(I`m sure you`ve heard this story before, but anyways, here goes again) Years ago i carried out a test, I went all over the place , to quite a number of rolling road dynos, & took the very same mini, the very same set up , absolutely unchanged, & ran the car up on all these dynos in Brisbane,,, & guess what??? they varied by "Nearly" 40hp,,, by doing this test, it not only gave my customers an idea of what i`d been telling them all these years with regards to just using one dyno & only to compare changes you make on your own car,,, but also to get a better idea of what a new customers car actually has got at the wheels when speaking with them about it prior to working on it,,, then going for a drive myself,,, then tuning it for them,,, & then they report back to me after taking their car back to that same dyno again... It`s given me a "Std" to work with,,, i`m just working on the same idea with all the info being thrown around the net on the twinkys now days *smiley*

please forgive me if i sounded like i was questioning your facts,,, believe me that is absolutely not the case,,, hence my explanation above--> OK???

We`ve done quite a lot of work on these heads over the years & are still playing around,,, & apart from all the customers twinkys we`re developing... & our own road & race engines ,,, we also have a few "special" engines we`re working on , one of which is in the hands of one of Australias best engine & cam shaft Gurus (No expense spared on this one)
*smiley* & we`re learning quite a lot as we go.

What`s happening with this one particular engine is all "hush-Hush",,, sorry i`ve been sworn to secrecy until the car is completed

I do feel a little embarased to be honest tho,,, because there are lots of people throwing around all these dyno curves & flow figures & as yet we havn`t "displayed/advertised" any facts from our own findings...

I don`t think i need to bother to show proof of what a std Twinky goes like,,, however, when we`ve finished developing our "good" engines, you guys will be within the first few mini forums to see the results... I`m in no rush mate,,, i like these engines & as you well know, i`ve been doing this stuff a very long time,,, not just a few years.

www.miniman.com.au

"""LazyGoodForNothingSmartArseKnowItAllBackYardMiniMechanic"""


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

CCC Magazine June 91. KAD 16v flow figures. I have a hi res scan of the full article, and a low res scan is posted on EFi Minis.

If you want the high res scan, I will have to put some coal in and fire up the old desktop PC

Edited by Sprocket on 15th Mar, 2009.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook


On 15th Mar, 2009 MadMatt said:

I went all over the place , to quite a number of rolling road dynos, & took the very same mini, the very same set up , absolutely unchanged, & ran the car up on all these dynos in Brisbane,,, & guess what??? they varied by "Nearly" 40hp



Matt, This is why many people on this forum call them Baldwins, Bananas and curley Wurley's as some places still quote inflated figures.

What I would be interested to know is, if you were quoted a figure 40bhp more than the last place you visited, which figure would you consider to be the right one? I know which one I would be thinking was right, which is not what the majority of people would.

That is not really the case if you are using modern dyno systems. Take for example the TwinK dyno shoot out. The type of dyno used is known to spit out unusual figures, mainly because it calculates the transmission loss rather than measuring it (even that thats not quite right). JohnK then took the demo car for mapping to a roller dyno and reported back that the figures were withing 1bhp of those on the dyno shoot out. The two dynos could not be more different! yet gave readings that could be considered acurate.

In this day and age there is no excuse for not providing a print out (much the same way as your time slips from the strip) that is acurate to within 5bhp of each dyno. Mind you, you Ausies seem to like the clockwork stuff, so I wouldnt be surprised if you are still using analogue dynos as well *hehe!* not that there is anything wrong with analogue dynos for tuning purposes

I think you find that the upcoming dyno shoot out in Mini Magazine will show the true potential for these engines rather than the wildly inflated figures that are going around. There is clearly room for improvement, but at least its a 'realistic' representaion

Also, you keep going on about how you have done this and that to your conversions and development over the years suggesting that you have been doing these 'kits' for years, when you only started putting the kits together last year*oh well*

Edited by Sprocket on 16th Mar, 2009.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


MadMatt

User Avatar

703 Posts
Member #: 105
1st to provide proof of a running Bimmy Conversion!

Brisbane ,Australia

yeah sproket i totally agree with most of what you`re saying with regards to "differing" dyno figures,,, It`s ancient old hat mate,,,

I was responding to JohnK because it "Seemed" to me that he may have thought i was having a go at his flow figures,,, which i wasn`t, because our flow test on a std 16v head came up at 135cfm when his showd 150,,, is that not fair to state???

that`s why i did my "Test" with a number of (7) dynos in Brisbane, & yes i took the lowest figure out of the bunch as it was definately more realistic.

& that`s why i`m building a pattern of what heads flow what figures on whos flow bench,,, same as i did with the rolling road dynos

work out what lifts they`re measured at & what "s of water (10, 25 or what?) was the inlet manifold fitted & if so what design ??? etc etc etc,,, it`s all relevent to the figures that people are happy to toss around & i like to get an idea of what is comparable across the other side of the planet,,, that`s all.

It`s widely known here in Australia, that figures reported in mini magazines from over there (UK) are just "WAY" higher than generally thought of being "The Norm" here,,, so does that mean you guys are just soooo dam good & we`re no good at building fast cyl heads??? maybe you are , maybe you`re not,,, maybe we`re all doing the same thing, just getting differing results (More likely) ,,, i just like to know why the results are so different

one dyno against another is good (i like doing that ... as much as others hold no weight in same) , like you said with Johns demo being very similar on 2 different dynos,,, but bring it here (Aust) & i can assure you that the 7 dynos we used will """MOST CERTAINLY""" give you quite a large differnce between them,,, again,,, i like to know why,,, same with flow figures,,, i like to see where & why they vary.

One thing you may need to realise is that i have grown up right in the middle of this industry, i actually "lived" in my family mini workshop nearly my entire life,,, yes Literally """Lived in the workshop my whole life""" Racing mini specials from the age of 7 years old.

My dad (Jack) was (& i use the word "Was" as he`s very old & buggered now & doesn`t spanner much at all these days) one of the very best mini engine builders & tuners in the country for more than a few decades,,, (You would only need to speak with people like John Shmidt from Mini king & Henry Draper ex Northern Mini Spares,,, or Freddy Sayers or , basically "ANY" of the top Knowlegable & fast mini guys in Australia & you will be surely told)

He was also a very very quick peddler (driver) ,,,However, The business grew so big that we had over 18 staff most of the time (plenty more at other times) with 2 seperate shops,,, one speciffically for parts & the other specifically for the workshop... & he had to try to keep a finger on the pulse,,, So he stopped racing & slowed up on the engine building & concentrated on the parts side of it...

soo,,, I do actually have a little bit of an idea how mini engines work & what`s needed to make them go hard & last long

when i was 16 years old, i started doing the alloy V8 conversion onto the austin 1800 gearbox... similar to what Viku did in Jukka Harcolas web site, but years earlier.

Back in the days when most motorbikes had their cam chains set inbetween #2 & 3 cyl i was toying with the idea of cutting one up & making it fit onto a mini motor (because i raced bikes as well as minis)

But as soon as they changed over to the cam chain at the end of the donk, well i was away with head gasket in had & i found 3 bike heads to "Look like" they would work,,, one of those was the Bimmer & in fact was (i believe) the very first Bimmer cyl head avaliable in the wrecking yards here. (A Dropped police bike actually) *smiley*

Yes,,, the fact is that i`ve been doing this conversion for a very long time.

as soon as the yamaha R6 20v came about i bought one of those too, it`s now slowly turning into a reality also,,, now i have a few,,,, & also bought 2x complete R1 power units, one of which resides in my hillclimb special, again done well before most others on the planet

You said --> """Also, you keep going on about how you have done this and that to your conversions and development over the years suggesting that you have been doing these 'kits' for years, when you only started putting the kits together last year"""

Selling my kits only last year means nothing,,,, I don`t think i`ve said much about them at all Sprocket,,, suggesting absolutely nothing except for how long it`s been since i started doing them... &&& helping out """HEAPS""" of people all over the world to work out their own problems refarding the lack of info they have been given about the kits they bought or had made,,, Now i wonder how i could have possibly helped those people (& yes some of those frequent this & many other mini boards)

Refining my kit more than 3 times before rushing out & selling the first design took a few more years than i`d have liked, yeah,,, fair enough people can have a go at me for taking so long,,, but i "borrow" the CNC machine time,,, it`s not my machine... therfor i have to wait till Bruce has some free space/time to punch out more bits

There`s now only the 3 of us working here,,, we take our time,,, i like to go for a surf every week at Byron Bay (mostly fri/sat),,, we also like to go race Down hill Mountain bikes every sunday when we`re not racing minis.

I now have (what i like to call) a decent "Life-style"... i`m in no rush mate...

Please don`t confuse a good "idea" that anyone has/had,,, with the "purchasing/selling" date of a kit,,, the kit is just a few bits you fit to a donk to make a head fit & cams turn mate,,, nothing in that about "Performance",,, they`re just bits of alloy & a few bolts & plugs, a belt & tensioner,,, all that part was worked out long before i was even on the net.

i made quite a few differnt versions before i decided on this one,,, & all by myself mine you,,, No help from my dad,,, no help from basically anyone,,, Ii didn`t use Bruces CNC equipment for them either,,, & yes one of those has also been up on my web site for probably 12 years or more, but was made before i was on the net

Sooo,,, history lesson can continue if you like to be bored shitless,,, but it won`t get any facts or figures out of my race engines till we`re happy to do so

& besides,,, i really have been sworn to secrecy,,, it`s dead true,,, i`m """Using""" a good friend of mine & i won`t betray his trust,,, sorry,,, but a deal is a deal & i won`t break confidence.

& please don`t confuse the issue i have in another thread relating to "another" twinky kit producer claiming "First" rights,,, that`s not about me, it`s about Greg Temkin,,, he should be given at least some credit, just like John K gave him credit.

sorry about the long rant,,, i don`t want any anguish between any o use,,, & besides it`s absolutely P!$$ing down rain here & i`m not about to go outside & get all wet, cold & misserable *smiley*

I think this is the longest post i`ve typed ever *smiley*



www.miniman.com.au

"""LazyGoodForNothingSmartArseKnowItAllBackYardMiniMechanic"""


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

To think that the Aussie call us "whinging" *hehe!*

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


MadMatt

User Avatar

703 Posts
Member #: 105
1st to provide proof of a running Bimmy Conversion!

Brisbane ,Australia

hee hee,,, it must be "pick on matt" day *smiley*

www.miniman.com.au

"""LazyGoodForNothingSmartArseKnowItAllBackYardMiniMechanic"""


carl talbot

326 Posts
Member #: 1323
Senior Member




On 15th Mar, 2009 fastcarl said:
Peter Herbert is a gentlman racer though Carl.lol


I used to keep up with Peter Herbert in his BD? Westfield when I had the KAD in the Moggy !!

I'm referring to the Blenkinsops , Staniforth prep'd , IRS , full monty competition Westfield ; with Teme Valley Racing [ Graham Hickman ] prep'd Ally BD?

I [ only ] had a 1962 Lotus 7 to twiddle with :)

2 seconds quicker at Barbon , which I vaguely remember as around the 26 second run
Over a second quicker at Shelsley , which was about 30-31 seconds ?
Both hills genuine Power hills


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

Another marathon post from MAtt :)

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


fastcarl

User Avatar

6965 Posts
Member #: 507
Fastest A Series Mini in the World

leeds/wakefield.


i can't remember the blemkinsop blokes name ,but what a pisser having a wife quicker as a driver than he was, at least she was when they came to Harewood.
they were another pair of winging twats too, thanks fook my wife has minmal intereset in cars , i'd hate to think she'd turn into a Sara Blankinsop if she ever got the bug,lol.

Peter is a gent, he's was so popular at Harewood it was all but inpossible to get the scruteneers to find any fault with his car, i can think of one mod that could have had him looked at closely,

carl

WWW.FORCE-RACING.CO.UK PLEASE CLICK HERE


MadMatt

User Avatar

703 Posts
Member #: 105
1st to provide proof of a running Bimmy Conversion!

Brisbane ,Australia

Carl,,, i can`t believe you did`t have a go at me or my long winded post ??? *smiley*

& i must say while you`re on the subject,,, i firmly believe that, given an early training, females make far better drivers,,, but hey> that`s just my opinion

*smiley*

www.miniman.com.au

"""LazyGoodForNothingSmartArseKnowItAllBackYardMiniMechanic"""


carl talbot

326 Posts
Member #: 1323
Senior Member




On 16th Mar, 2009 MadMatt said:
Carl,,,

& i must say while you`re on the subject,,, i firmly believe that, given an early training, females make far better drivers,,, but hey> that`s just my opinion

*smiley*


That's what Carl's worried about
It wouldn't even take any training..............






















He doesn't even do corners anymore *happy*


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

This topic is starting to sound a little like how this topic http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=8743 went

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


carl talbot

326 Posts
Member #: 1323
Senior Member




On 16th Mar, 2009 Sprocket said:
This topic is starting to sound a little like how this topic http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=8743 went


Looking at your link :
and your post:
"What sort of RPM you running at Engine-tuner to achieve circa 300 bananas. RBR quote 312bhp at 12000 RPM. I do remember there being a chap who built a 970 based screamer using the KAD head red lining at 13000. He was using chain drive due to the negetive aspects of the syncronous belt. It was Cover story in Miniworld some years ago. He painted the car pink too. LOL"

I think Nick who worked at KAD built the 970 screamer with chain drive ? specifically to see how the head would perform beyond the 'normal' A series rpm band


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 16th Mar, 2009 MadMatt said:
Carl,,, i can`t believe you did`t have a go at me or my long winded post ??? *smiley*

& i must say while you`re on the subject,,, i firmly believe that, given an early training, females make far better drivers,,, but hey> that`s just my opinion

*smiley*




i thought that was very interesting post matt ,well done .!

with ref to the dyno stuff . at the wheels ,most dynos should read within 5 % ,if calibrated accurately and not fudged to make higher nos .
the whole losses lark iv written about before ,but the twink shoot out one added 17% i think pip said ,and presumably the dd one added a percentage that created a similar reading to the other one .
my opinion of the adding percentages system is it makes no sense whatsoever LOL.
with regards to the whole analog digital dyno gubbins .basically a dyno is just a torque wrench ,with a speed sensor ,whether its 50 years old or new ,they all measure torque and speed ,then the software does the rest .if you can make a computer generated graph from it ,it makes no difference what its internal bits are , if its measuring torque and speed accurately ,reliably,then it ll work well .
personally i prefer the eddy current type for its finer adjustment ,over the hydraulic one on the hub dyno , but they both work .
also , just like a torque wrench , which can measure either accurately or unaccurately ,a dyno can measure true bhp to within a certain design percentage .but it MUST be calibrated ,and used in the right way ,not used to boost the owners ego.
there are a fair few dyno's out there that have been made to read high ,and i often got the comment with mine of 'hmm i thought it would be more' .... i remember a chap with a 1800 vw golf engine ,headers, k and n etc ,thinking he'd get 137 to 145 bhp ,and he had on my rollers 112 ,very dissapointed ,and i explained to him that that was 112 accurate bhp ,not 'make that sale' bhp .. i think he was a bit shocked when my mini on the same roller had 114 bhp at only 3.5 psi!

regards robert

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


johnK

1425 Posts
Member #: 690
Post Whore

Norfolk

The rolling road we use is very true and is regulary calibrated and benchmarked against stock cars, we had a stock mini sprite on a couple of weeks back and it made 50hp on the nose - we take the crown of the lowest power car on these rollers.lol!

Anyway a funny story -a friend of mine races a car in the formula Vee championship - 1300cc limited tuned Beetle motor in the back of a Formula Ford basically. Any way he'd been using a rolling road in Essex somewhere for the past couple of years- long way from Norfolk and wanted to do some pre-season carb setting and asked me for advice - I pointed him to APT whose rollers we use, he was sceptical but went for it anyway. So said friend was most impressed with the carb tuning ability of the guys up there but was mighty un-impressed with the flywheel figure of "only" 82bhp (20 horse less than the twink demo car does at the wheels-teehee!) and thought something major was amiss, anyway two days later he's at Snetterton doing a test and tune session - low and behold the car is much faster everywhere, pulling clean through the rev range - the only thing is will he admit to the rest of the paddock that he only has 82bhp - good bragging rights if he comes top six!!

JK

If Carling made Mini engines
it would probably be like this one!


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland

Nice one John,
We had a similar experience here last year when we put out a top spec 1380 for an X porches champion, we had it rolling roadbed at a local RR company who I trust implicitly the car made 128hp and 110fp/lb torque when we got to the track for the first day there was some paddock sniggering going on to the supposedly “low”HP figure of this car after race 1 it was 1st in class and ahead of 4 cars in the next class up, A very staying day and a true example of pub talk HP against a real quick motor built well producing the goods,
Piece out,
Paul.

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


James_H

User Avatar

3692 Posts
Member #: 1833
Formally mini_majic

Auckland, New Zealand

jesus christ. you lot the to chill out. you'll break your keyboards soon! what have your keyboards ever done to you!! *happy*

it will be great if we can get lots of flow figures together for lots of different heads in different states of tune.....


MadMatt

User Avatar

703 Posts
Member #: 105
1st to provide proof of a running Bimmy Conversion!

Brisbane ,Australia

On 16th Mar, 2009 Sprocket said:
This topic is starting to sound a little like how this topic http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=8743 went


Ooohh yeah,,, the 300hp claim,,, was that me?? i`m sure i posted my 440hp twinky engine claims somewhere *smiley* or was that even more,,, dam i`m not sure what i`ve "claimed" hp & torque wise now,,, maybe you can enlighten me on that Sprocket *smiley*

but i`m sure you`ve been to all the mini forums & therfore would have seen all my engines & manifolds & cars & turbos & intercoolers & such yeah?? They were all at the "Qld Mini Muster" one of Australias biggest mini shows middle of last year... sorry if the UK mini magazines that you read didn`t actually cover it *smiley*

It`s not hard to actually confirm all my statements Sprocket,,, i`m just not sure why you`re harrassing me about all this,,, i`ve not barked at you in any way what so ever,,, i am a bit bemused actually as to why you`d even bother to

Just that i cannot speak about one particular engine, nor where it`s being tested & tuned, who it`s for, or what is happening to it,,, there is a race scene here that can be a bit "Dog-eat-Dog" & as i`m sure you can appreciate the need to keep this engine Tight-Lipped" & totally "In-House",,, there are quite a few Australian people who lurk around the mini forums trying to gather info... & as previously stated, i`m not about to break confidence,,, i am sorry.

But i havn`t "Claimed" any "Magic" numbers Sprocket,,, except for the 135cfm we got from one of our 2nd hand K1100 heads,,, if you`re just miffed as to me "Not" supplying you with specific details & figures then bad luck mate,,, In time you may *smiley*

If you have doubts about how many twinkys i`m doing then please do ring Terry from Cooparoo Engine Reconditioning, (07) 33996024 they have helped take some of the burden of all these twinkys that i`m building off my shoulders with preparing more than a few blocks for me while i play with other more important things

Oh & if you`d also like to confirm how many kits we have made & when we actually started the very first one,,, & also when we started producing them for sale, then please do contact Bruce Ayres from Ayres Engineering (07) 33996100

& i`m sure that one day in the not so distant future that you will be reading a little story about a certain (small capacity) twinky donk built here in OZ,,, but you`d have to wait for that too wouldn`t you? *smiley*

sorry to all you other people for the long rants,,, This particular post was in fact quire a bit longer before i edited out a whole pile of usless dribble attempting to defend myself,,, as JohnK suggested to me , it`s not necessary nor is it professional

but when i`m harrassed by anyone, i like to explain what`s going on...

Edited by MadMatt on 17th Mar, 2009.

www.miniman.com.au

"""LazyGoodForNothingSmartArseKnowItAllBackYardMiniMechanic"""


rich13801

32 Posts
Member #: 2150
Member

On 16th Mar, 2009 MadMatt said:
as soon as the yamaha R6 20v came about i bought one of those too, it`s now slowly turning into a reality also,,,


Guess you haven't stripped it yet ? If you had you'd of found 4 valves missing. The R6 never got 5 valves per cylinder, only 4 !


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

are we talking about the same thing?

were these engines running ?

Jimster was the first to have a fully running 16v turbo, whether it be in a car or sat on the floor, it was running, and driving in july 2006, I know, I was there!

There is clearly some confusion here *oh well*

This is not harrasment, just trying to straighten this all out. You lay claim to having the first of these engines Turbo Charged, yet nearly 3 years ago, Jimster claimed that title and you congratulated him without a boo to a Goose

As far as I'm concerened, it doesnt matter how good it looks, if its not running it dont count, perhaps you may think differently, I dont know.

Like I said, Im not having a go, just fining it difficult to stay on one line of thought with this.

Do you confirm Jimsters claim or not?

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


MadMatt

User Avatar

703 Posts
Member #: 105
1st to provide proof of a running Bimmy Conversion!

Brisbane ,Australia

Sprocket,,, yes i had mine fitted with the turbo & had it all set up in my Monaco,,, it`s been all over the net for years & yes i congratulated Jimster for having his running before mine altho mine was running well before that without any boost, --->we didn`t have the turbo actually pushing air into the plenum chamber, just spinning the exhaust out , we just ran it to show the boys here ,,,& that`s why i applauded & congratulated Jimster for having his actually working,,, i don`t believe i claimed that spot in the time line at all,,, check all the previous posts & you will see that i continued to say mine wasn`t running "Properly" & nor was it driving a car "at that time"

why are you pestering me about that??? when you have obviously missed the point,,, i`ve never laid claim to that ever!!!

& rich,,, sorry typo,,, meant to be R1 & yes it has a 79mm -ish bore diam so i`ve made a spacer plate,,, much the same as David Rosenthal did with his Aussie first Honda headed engine

Please let it be known, i have never laid claim to being the first (except for having my first big bore twinky with injection running)

Yes i believe i was "Obviously" the first to "fit" a turbo & have it all manifolded up & fitted into a car (all be it not running properly)

But i`ve never laid claim to being first with much else to do with them , I`m the one trying to get Greg Temkin credit for being the actual first... I`m not flying my own "First" flag with anything esle at all,,, & it`s not even an issue in my books

What is your problem???
crickey!!!!! Do you need glasses to help you read what`s written mate>????

This was meant to be about flow figures,,, now you bark at me for not posting my findings, when i`ve clearly stated that "one" of our 2nd hand K1100 heads flowed way less than Johns , so i question that,,, & you now bark at me for some other sh!t that is well past it`s use by date,,, bringing up BS like me laying claim to being the first turbo charged twinky... what is with you??? got your buns on for sure mate,,, sorry but did i smack you in the back of the head with a shovel in a previous life or something???,,, you remind me of local rules surf rage *smiley*

Edit--> OH, & before you bark at me for claiming to be the first to have a 20v head running on a mini engine , no,,, its not running & it probably won`t be running for some time either, i`m too busy typing replys to this sort of crap

*smiley*

Jimster,,, how do we get on mate??? How much praise have i given you over the years? How much praise do i give any/everyone who attempts these types of conversions???

Sprocket,,, sorry for being rude,,, but man,,, you`re really poking fingers at me for some reason,,, good for you mate,,, hope you feel much better for it,,, but when you finally do get what you want, try not to show your back-peddling too much hey? *smiley*

Edited by MadMatt on 17th Mar, 2009.

www.miniman.com.au

"""LazyGoodForNothingSmartArseKnowItAllBackYardMiniMechanic"""


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 17th Mar, 2009 Sprocket said:


Do you confirm Jimsters claim or not?


On 17th Mar, 2009 MadMatt said:


why are you pestering me about that??? when you have obviously missed the point,,, i`ve never laid claim to that ever!!!



http://www.efiminis.olicentral.com/index.p...msg4945#msg4945

[quote author=MadMatt date=March 12th, 2009]

We ("The MiniMan" Brisbane, Australia) had completed this conversion on "Big Bore" engines well before anyone & we were the 2nd to set them up on small bore mini donks, the first was Greg Temkin... we were also the very first to have one turbo charged.




I am really not one to pester, and its not surprising you forget what you have typed, with the quantity and length of your posts. But the whole reason this all came about was the fact that some one was seen to be saying something that was thought not to be correct?

This is the last you hear from me on this subject mate, I now know where I stand :)

I will bring this topic back on subject by posting up the full 1991 CCC magazine article of the KAD development story :)

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


MadMatt

User Avatar

703 Posts
Member #: 105
1st to provide proof of a running Bimmy Conversion!

Brisbane ,Australia

just check out the "Show us yours" thread Sproket,,, dates are quite relevent, sorry but it was fitted onto the engine & it did run not long after that mate.

But i`m not taking away from Jimsters efforts,,, he had his running & driving & that`s what you`re on about isn`t it,,, massive difference a few wirse & some fuel makes in your books, then good for you bro

But still, that`s why i`m happy with Jimster being revered to be the first turbo twinky running... i`ve no problem with that, but you seem to ???

www.miniman.com.au

"""LazyGoodForNothingSmartArseKnowItAllBackYardMiniMechanic"""

Home > General Chat > BMW K100 8 valve flow figures
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: