| Page: |
| Home > General Chat > long stroke turbo. | |||||||
|
8215 Posts Member #: 90 Post Whore Somewhere around Swindon |
30th Oct, 2007 at 01:17:15pm
me i think lol
On 30th of Oct, 2007 at 12:27am BENROSS said:
whats the problem ? Crystal Sound Audio said:
Why wolfie...you should have your name as Fuckfaceshithead ! "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."-Douglas Adams |
||||||
|
591 Posts Member #: 360 Stu from Corwall aka Mr Jazz Piano, Love_Machine, kneegrow |
30th Oct, 2007 at 02:29:44pm
I was wondering why people aren't doing it more. The thing is that if you have a head which flows, you can make the most by having a huge capacity or revving the hell out of it. The 16v engines I've heard about don't tend to do either (that much). For instance, if the K head flows more air than the best Lotus K-Series head, you are talking about a serious capability to get a huge amount out of the A Series naturally aspirated. I can't really see the point of boosting one, apart from you can have 4 point injection. You're limited by the compression ratio and all you're doing by using FI is making a denser charge. The capability of the head doesn't need that. It merely produces higher peak pressures at standard capacities and revs. (which is all very well). If you are going to stroke an engine, there is a better lever effect and the torque reflects this. If you boost the engine, the increase in BMEP will amplify this more. I think stroking and boring is a very good idea with turbos and getting your own back on the head with a more vigourous camshaft.
Bugger off, I'm getting there. |
||||||
| Home > General Chat > long stroke turbo. | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |
