Page:
Home > Technical Chat > turbo advise needed

1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member




On 28th Feb, 2010 Paul S said:
I would say that you would be better off with a full GT1752, not just the compressor. The GT15 turbine housing will be restrictive.

As a guide, robert's 1310cc A series running a GT1752 will do 150hp with about 0.65 bar boost.

However, you need an efficient intercooler.


What C/R is that using? it just seems so high for the boost, 1242cc MPI 16v engines with a T2 on the cinqs running 0.7 bar are only making 150bhp with an 8.5:1 c/r??
And my fries micra 1275 16v turbo 8.5:1 with T2 running 0.7 bar is making 134bhp.

my intercooler is naf i no haha, its a space issue, it either gets mounted on the front off car or thats as big as can go :(

thanks

jason


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member




On 28th Feb, 2010 mini13 said:
Yes it does look like you are going to be falling off the map of the smaller unit,

that coupled with what is a fairly small intercooler (by our standards lol) is not going to help.

just an idea, but can you stick a slimline fan on the (water) rad, move it back a couple of inches and get a big IC in front?


My rad is 5mm from the turbine housing on the T15 :(

and the space infront of the rad as it is only fits my oil cooler, as said above i either front externally mount it or i stick with the GT item.
Also the decomp plate is going asap,,,messes up the fuel squash, im going to use 16 v punto pistons and rods, they are lighter, stronger and lower the C/R to exactly 8.5:1

thankyou

jason


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 28th Feb, 2010 1250cinqturbo said:
The main reason i run a 1 bar of boost is like ive said the compression is to low for this setup, if the engine where more efficient then i would achieve better power form less boost or alot more for the same boost......at least thats my plan :$


The effect on engine power due to the lower compression ratio should not be as much as you think.

The difference in cycle efficiency between 7.4:1 and 8.5:1 accounts for about 4.5% power. Less than the effect of 1 psi of boost.

People seemed to have turned the rule about lowering compression to accomodate forced induction, to mean that if you lower the compression you need to add a lot of boost to get power back to where you started.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member




On 28th Feb, 2010 Paul S said:

On 28th Feb, 2010 1250cinqturbo said:
The main reason i run a 1 bar of boost is like ive said the compression is to low for this setup, if the engine where more efficient then i would achieve better power form less boost or alot more for the same boost......at least thats my plan :$


The effect on engine power due to the lower compression ratio should not be as much as you think.

The difference in cycle efficiency between 7.4:1 and 8.5:1 accounts for about 4.5% power. Less than the effect of 1 psi of boost.

People seemed to have turned the rule about lowering compression to accomodate forced induction, to mean that if you lower the compression you need to add a lot of boost to get power back to where you started.


i understand what you say, but the fact that i lost 21bhp @0.65 bar by adding 1.5mm of lift to cylinderhead highlighted a big problem on my engine :(
As a rought guide on the f.i.r.e engines 1.5mm lift i.e my decomp plate drops the c/r 1:1 each time, from the stanadard C/R off 9.6:1 plus decomp - 8.6:1 plus the extra HG - 7.6:1-7.5:1 but then my cylinder head has 1mm skimmed of off it (its coming of soon as it is not sutable for my engine)

jason


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member

its also worth me mensioning 6bhp loss was because of the incorrect timming caused by the decomp plate, hence why i run an adjustable pulley

jason


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

so effectivly you are running a squish of about 4.5mm?

I would not be suprised if that accounts for the difference in power due to the burn changes.

I for example am running .8mm squish, and i think the majory of engines here run somthing around 0.8-1mm.

Of course different engines like diferent things...:?

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member




On 28th Feb, 2010 mini13 said:
so effectivly you are running a squish of about 4.5mm?

I would not be suprised if that accounts for the difference in power due to the burn changes.

I for example am running .8mm squish, and i think the majory of engines here run somthing around 0.8-1mm.

Of course different engines like diferent things...:?



yes exactly, its a rubbish design,,,the head is miles off the block haha.
when i finish at work tomorow im going to do a little exsperiment (while im building up my new engine) im going to whip the head off,,,,thrown away the decomp plate, take away the stage 2 head which was origonally designed for N/A high comp use and put a standard head on with two head gaskets, that should bring the C/R to 8.5:1. Then when i get the hybrid back ill pop it on, take it to the rolling road for a setup at 1 bar boost and see what the end result is!

jason


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

hi jason , i have the 188 bhp at 16 psi mini ,on a gt17 .
id think it would work well for you .

that 188bhp was on 15 degrees of timing so very retarded ,and also with a hot intercooler since there was no cooling flow through it .. with a fan on the ic and a bit more timing id estimate 200 bhp on 16 psi.
ill find you a graph of boost rise /rpm

here you go


bhp versus boost
122bhp 5.5 psi
144bhp 9 psi
168 bhp 12psi
183 bhp 15 psi
188bhp 16 psi


regards robert

Edited by robert on 28th Feb, 2010.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member

thankyou robert, very impressive!!

it gives me something to think about.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I think that the advantage of the A series over a lot of modern engines is the choice of cams available. 50 years of development has to count for something.

What choice of cams are there for the 8v fiat?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member




On 28th Feb, 2010 Paul S said:
I think that the advantage of the A series over a lot of modern engines is the choice of cams available. 50 years of development has to count for something.

What choice of cams are there for the 8v fiat?


Not to many unless you go for a custom grind, i use an 866 camshaft from a punto 75, it has higher lift and a better duration over the standard 1108 cam, its been proven to give good gains on the turbo cinqs but there is a cutom C&B 280 cam available for the turbos.
I have always taken the car to Noble Motorsports where it has been setup 5 time in differnt specs, they have an idea to run my active knock controller with a 9:1 C/R running 1 bar to give impressive power gains without det.

jason


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member

just out of interest thought you may like this, ive been doing the math to work out my current lb/min at my boost pressure to plot it acuratly on the map.

Pressure Ratio (14.7+15)/14.7 = 2 P/R

CFM = 1.25x6000x85x2 /5660 = 225 CFM

225/14.27 = 15.7lb/min

plotting that on the Compressor map from the GT1544 it puts me of off the map over the choke line at 210,000rpm.
This would exsplain the huge inlet temps and lack of gains above 0.8bar. Even the GT1544 with the 44mm wheel would be very unefficient at this level running at about 70% efficiency!

glad i found this map ive been looking for one for some time! thanks guys

jason

Edited by 1250cinqturbo on 2nd Mar, 2010.


GaryOS

User Avatar

1424 Posts
Member #: 2810
Formally spanner181187

Dublin, Ireland

Just as a point of reference, I calculated my engine will consume 12.3 lb/min (I can't remember the pressure ratio off hand) and I will be operating on the peak efficiency of the bigger GT1544. It does sound like you need an upgrade, probably on the turbine side too.
Did you see the interpolated map for the GT1752 to see where you lie on that?

On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:

I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse *happy*


On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best


mcalvert39

388 Posts
Member #: 442
Senior Member

Manchester

I did a little searching for chinq turbos and i read that anything over 1bar or boost and the standard pistons turn into cheese.
Also had personal experience of the oil strainer becoming blocked, blocking up the oil jets on the cam and rapidly wearing it down.

As you mentioned a change of pistons to change the compression ratio needed would surley be a better option.


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member




On 28th Feb, 2010 mcalvert39 said:
I did a little searching for chinq turbos and i read that anything over 1bar or boost and the standard pistons turn into cheese.
Also had personal experience of the oil strainer becoming blocked, blocking up the oil jets on the cam and rapidly wearing it down.

As you mentioned a change of pistons to change the compression ratio needed would surley be a better option.


the standard pistons you talk about are probably the flat top 1108cc engine items, mine is the 1242 dished pistons which are stronger, they turn to cheese through det because of the SPI setup causing a weak fuel mixture on number 4 where the servo vac take off is.
ive ran mine with the boost controller recording highs off 18.4 psi without pistons damage for over 20,000miles.

but yes i will be going to the 1.2 16v pistons and rods.
and as with any engine the stariner becomeing blocked is related to oil, oil changes, breathers etc
my oil is chahnged every 1500miles :$
with 5w/40 fully syn oil and gets flush with forte every 5000miles, alot of people continue to use 15w/40 mineral when going to turbo and there fore gets deposits building up and dropping into the sump,,,not here..........id eat out of my sump haha.

thanks

jason


1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member




On 28th Feb, 2010 GaryOS said:
Just as a point of reference, I calculated my engine will consume 12.3 lb/min (I can't remember the pressure ratio off hand) and I will be operating on the peak efficiency of the bigger GT1544. It does sound like you need an upgrade, probably on the turbine side too.
Did you see the interpolated map for the GT1752 to see where you lie on that?


just had a look, it looks like id be bang on the best efficiency! right in the centre of the map, how much for a GT17 then?? im just thinking id have to run a new down pipe, manifold plate and it may not fit as my turbo is very close to the oil filter too.

jason


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

the 17's we use are off saab 93's (as you have probably read)

unfortunately they arn't that common, but your probably looking at a couple of hundred for a good used one.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Rebuilt-Gar...sQ5fAccessories

such as this??

thanks

jason

Edited by 1250cinqturbo on 28th Feb, 2010.


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

that's the puppy!

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member

this is so tempting, i just no id have a nightmare fiting it, my current down pipe is so close to the rad and oil filter, and looking at the circle flange on the GT17 its huge, making something to git it and then to fit to my down pipe would be hard...........hhhmmmm


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

I've found its best to buy the bits then MAKE them fit PMSL.

where there is a will there is a way....

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member

i surpose your right, it makes sence for me to go to the GT17..........i didnt intend on the car being off roaf for two long but i guess it might end up that way haha


GaryOS

User Avatar

1424 Posts
Member #: 2810
Formally spanner181187

Dublin, Ireland

My car is my daily driver and it's been off the road for 18 of the last 24 months!

On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:

I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse *happy*


On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

its always that way...

mine was of the road 10 years because i had to change a radius arm.... turned into a saga.... lol.

there must be a way of getting it in though, is there any room between the turbo and block? can you grind any webbing off the block to make some room? can you move the oil filter?

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



1250cinqturbo

48 Posts
Member #: 8432
Member

problem is this mad little car is my dailey car to work 9 miles from where i live through town haha.
thankfully on the cing the rad can go to the other side of the car, the oil filter can be replaced by a remote item and the block........well id rather not touch that haha.
it can be done but it may take some real effort and the car is in works lock up (im a mechanic)

im going to ask midland turbos if they stock a GT1752 on the shelf,,,,but how many variaents of the GT1753 are there??

Home > Technical Chat > turbo advise needed
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: