Page: |
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Side Mounted Turbo Design | |||||||
![]() 2054 Posts Member #: 452 Post Whore Chester, UK |
15th Mar, 2010 at 04:20:12pm
i dont really know how these cad things work does it show you tube lenghs and angles. as i think i could potentially get one made or make one myself with help from a friend as he is pretty good with a welder and making stuff like this.
Edited by t@z on 15th Mar, 2010. |
||||||
![]() 2054 Posts Member #: 452 Post Whore Chester, UK |
15th Mar, 2010 at 04:20:12pm
double post Edited by t@z on 15th Mar, 2010. |
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
15th Mar, 2010 at 04:22:59pm
yeah sure id share the file, once ive got the model correct ill do some drafts of the individual parts (angles and length), which ill be happy to share. 1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
15th Mar, 2010 at 06:25:29pm
hi chris , id run no4 into the top of the pipe from no1 at an acute angle so it joins as near parallel to no1 as possible , ,middle 3&2 pipe parallel to no 1 pipe .so all the tubes run to the turbo with no pipes curving backwards towards the water pump end .
Edited by robert on 15th Mar, 2010. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
4314 Posts Member #: 700 Formerly British Open Classic The West Country |
15th Mar, 2010 at 07:01:09pm
Robert, is it wise to have the coil pack mounted almost on top of the Turbo? Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer |
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
15th Mar, 2010 at 07:35:08pm
sorry rob ,my brain fused at trying to associate the two words ''robert'' and ''wise'' Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 3756 Posts Member #: 1709 I like granny porn. LONDONSHIRE |
15th Mar, 2010 at 08:21:19pm
On 15th Mar, 2010 paul wiginton said:
FFS, that is pretty much what Ive been designing for the last week or so. Nice work Paul but your going to make it out of coke cans paul, On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:
On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder. On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER) |
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
15th Mar, 2010 at 08:44:23pm
Cheers Rob, so do you mean blend cyl4 and cyl2&3 straight into cyl1 , unequal lengths? 1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
15th Mar, 2010 at 09:18:15pm
have 2 pipes going to the turbo flange , 1 from centre port ,and 1 from end ports .just dont turn no 4 towards the nearside , sweep it to the offside and blend into the pipe from no1 . so yes unequal lengths . Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 825 Posts Member #: 2208 Post Whore Essex |
15th Mar, 2010 at 09:34:20pm
this is good stuff, nice cad work! |
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
15th Mar, 2010 at 09:47:05pm
what about a "sidemount" variation of the log mirage manifold, like 1 90 degree bend(for the furthest away port, 2 t pieces (for the other ports) and a bit of pipe to the turbo flange. FUGLY but bet it wouldnt crack lol turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
16th Mar, 2010 at 08:01:03am
cheers wintersurfer, i am going to be running a verto clutch. i havent looked it to vnt turbos, just going to run a T3
1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 3756 Posts Member #: 1709 I like granny porn. LONDONSHIRE |
16th Mar, 2010 at 10:21:03am
ive got my mirage off at the mo if anyone needs to borrow it.....
On 15th Mar, 2010 evolotion said:
what about a "sidemount" variation of the log mirage manifold, like 1 90 degree bend(for the furthest away port, 2 t pieces (for the other ports) and a bit of pipe to the turbo flange. FUGLY but bet it wouldnt crack lol On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:
On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder. On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER) |
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
16th Mar, 2010 at 10:36:59am
what diameter tube and wall thickness are the mirage manifold?
1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 171 Posts Member #: 621 Advanced Member nsw austalia |
16th Mar, 2010 at 10:40:45am
similar might help with ideas
1152cc turboed mini clubman, most powerful 1.1L a-series?
|
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
16th Mar, 2010 at 10:44:59am
Cheers Ben, every picture helps 1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
16th Mar, 2010 at 01:11:06pm
i am taking note of everyone's input, i just want to get this model finished and then start of other iteration.
1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 6549 Posts Member #: 1149 #1 Basshunter Fan Force Racing ICT Dept Manager Miglia Turbo Am frum Yokshyer tha noes! |
16th Mar, 2010 at 01:31:47pm
Looks good! 1/4 Mile 14.3secs 96Mph Terminal 10psi of boost.
|
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
16th Mar, 2010 at 03:11:56pm
now cut no 4 after the 1st bend ,swing it round and into the no 1 pipe ? Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
16th Mar, 2010 at 03:22:28pm
so merge cyl4 straight into tube 1 without the 180Deg bend? Rob why shouldn't cyl4 pipe go back on its self? 1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
16th Mar, 2010 at 03:35:42pm
its a waste of pipe and available heat to fire up the turbo sooner . Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
16th Mar, 2010 at 03:42:45pm
but what about the primary lengths should they be similar? 1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
16th Mar, 2010 at 03:55:52pm
I'm not sure that I agree with Robert.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 1547 Posts Member #: 2727 Post Whore Bicester |
16th Mar, 2010 at 03:59:18pm
i plan to wrap the manifold once finished. space has been on my mind, i vaguely remember the manifold mounting face to bulkhead being roughly 125mm, the model measures 115mm Max 1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER |
||||||
![]() 6748 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
16th Mar, 2010 at 04:59:06pm
On 16th Mar, 2010 longy said:
but what about the primary lengths should they be similar? big subject chris , in this instance , taking into account the turbo your using ,amount of heat created under the carb , the more tortuous path given to no 4 by going left then right instead of just right , particularly focussing on heat build up at the sweep round to come back to offside , the greater length of no4 losing more heat than is necessary , it all weighs up in my mind as to being the best overall solution .. the less bends you have in any manifold the better dynamically speaking .in fact thinking about it , i think id join all three pipes at the turbo flange ! just to add more complication lol. i wouldnt get to worried about it , if you do the conventional thing with the sweep to the nearside then offside , it'll still work . Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Side Mounted Turbo Design | |||||||
|
Page: |