Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Side Mounted Turbo Design

t@z

User Avatar

2054 Posts
Member #: 452
Post Whore

Chester, UK

i dont really know how these cad things work does it show you tube lenghs and angles. as i think i could potentially get one made or make one myself with help from a friend as he is pretty good with a welder and making stuff like this.

if complete would u be able to share the file?

Edited by t@z on 15th Mar, 2010.

www.twitter.com/lilpinkiy


t@z

User Avatar

2054 Posts
Member #: 452
Post Whore

Chester, UK

double post

Edited by t@z on 15th Mar, 2010.

www.twitter.com/lilpinkiy


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

yeah sure id share the file, once ive got the model correct ill do some drafts of the individual parts (angles and length), which ill be happy to share.

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

hi chris , id run no4 into the top of the pipe from no1 at an acute angle so it joins as near parallel to no1 as possible , ,middle 3&2 pipe parallel to no 1 pipe .so all the tubes run to the turbo with no pipes curving backwards towards the water pump end .
alternatively , if you have one , id use the mtro turbo manifold and sweep a single pipe from that to the turbo like the hybrid is .

like this (but prettier)


the heat retained by the big cast mani would help response .

Edited by robert on 15th Mar, 2010.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Rob H

4314 Posts
Member #: 700
Formerly British Open Classic

The West Country

Robert, is it wise to have the coil pack mounted almost on top of the Turbo?

Isambard Kingdom Brunel said:
Nothing is impossible if you are an Engineer


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

sorry rob ,my brain fused at trying to associate the two words ''robert'' and ''wise''

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE




On 15th Mar, 2010 paul wiginton said:
FFS, that is pretty much what Ive been designing for the last week or so.
Nice work

Paul


but your going to make it out of coke cans paul,

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

Cheers Rob, so do you mean blend cyl4 and cyl2&3 straight into cyl1 , unequal lengths?

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

have 2 pipes going to the turbo flange , 1 from centre port ,and 1 from end ports .just dont turn no 4 towards the nearside , sweep it to the offside and blend into the pipe from no1 . so yes unequal lengths .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


wintersurferuk

User Avatar

825 Posts
Member #: 2208
Post Whore

Essex

this is good stuff, nice cad work! *Yes*


have you thought about vnt turbos? im looking at getting one, trying to find one about the same size as the t3.

on another note, what type of clutch are you thinking of using? the verto slave sits on the wok, may give you more room for the down pipe. from what i can see, Paul s's turbo sits high giving room for both.


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland

what about a "sidemount" variation of the log mirage manifold, like 1 90 degree bend(for the furthest away port, 2 t pieces (for the other ports) and a bit of pipe to the turbo flange. FUGLY but bet it wouldnt crack lol

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

cheers wintersurfer, i am going to be running a verto clutch. i havent looked it to vnt turbos, just going to run a T3


Evo i was thinking about a mirage spin off, but i thought the software im using is pretty simple to use so i might as well go the whole hog and model something a little fancy, but as soon as i finish this one ill draw up your suggestion.

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE

ive got my mirage off at the mo if anyone needs to borrow it.....


On 15th Mar, 2010 evolotion said:
what about a "sidemount" variation of the log mirage manifold, like 1 90 degree bend(for the furthest away port, 2 t pieces (for the other ports) and a bit of pipe to the turbo flange. FUGLY but bet it wouldnt crack lol

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

what diameter tube and wall thickness are the mirage manifold?
Cheers

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


benjamin

User Avatar

171 Posts
Member #: 621
Advanced Member

nsw austalia

similar might help with ideas

1152cc turboed mini clubman, most powerful 1.1L a-series?

http://boostmini.justboard.net/


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

Cheers Ben, every picture helps

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

i am taking note of everyone's input, i just want to get this model finished and then start of other iteration.



As you can see ive merged cyl1&4and used a seperate tube for cyl2&3.
merging the tubes takes ages as they are all on different plane and small changed were needed here and there.

the final model will be exact, notches and bends as they would be when fabricating. at the moment a couple of the tube merge and it look a bit messy

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


MikeRace

User Avatar

6549 Posts
Member #: 1149
#1 Basshunter Fan

Force Racing ICT Dept Manager Miglia Turbo Am frum Yokshyer tha noes!

Looks good!

1/4 Mile 14.3secs 96Mph Terminal 10psi of boost.


Fibreglass Parts? - http://www.tdkracing.co.uk/
Split Rims? - http://www.force-racing.co.uk/


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

now cut no 4 after the 1st bend ,swing it round and into the no 1 pipe ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

so merge cyl4 straight into tube 1 without the 180Deg bend? Rob why shouldn't cyl4 pipe go back on its self?

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

its a waste of pipe and available heat to fire up the turbo sooner .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

but what about the primary lengths should they be similar?

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I'm not sure that I agree with Robert.

You need to balance the benefits of equally spaced pulses with the heat loss.

I would try to keep the primaries the same length and keep the heat in by lagging if need be.

You may have a space issue though.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


longy

User Avatar

1547 Posts
Member #: 2727
Post Whore

Bicester

i plan to wrap the manifold once finished. space has been on my mind, i vaguely remember the manifold mounting face to bulkhead being roughly 125mm, the model measures 115mm Max

1972 998 TURBO SLEEPER


robert

User Avatar

6748 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 16th Mar, 2010 longy said:
but what about the primary lengths should they be similar?


big subject chris ,

in this instance , taking into account the turbo your using ,amount of heat created under the carb , the more tortuous path given to no 4 by going left then right instead of just right , particularly focussing on heat build up at the sweep round to come back to offside , the greater length of no4 losing more heat than is necessary , it all weighs up in my mind as to being the best overall solution ..

the less bends you have in any manifold the better dynamically speaking .in fact thinking about it , i think id join all three pipes at the turbo flange ! just to add more complication lol.


i wouldnt get to worried about it , if you do the conventional thing with the sweep to the nearside then offside , it'll still work .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Side Mounted Turbo Design
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: