Page:
Home > Technical Chat > gt17 latest thinking .

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

This tip height issue MUST be resolved.

So I got the socket set out and took a couple of brand new turbos apart *surprised*



Big difference in overall size, but the tip heights are 3.5mm and 4mm ish.

So I can confirm that the GT1752 has a larger tip height than the GT2056.

This does mean that the Gt1752 will flow more than I previously thought, but it will also lower the pressure ratio at a given speed, so the map will look shorter and fatter.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 21st Oct, 2010 Paul S said:
This is the official version of the map:

http://img280.imageshack.us/f/13tcompressormapsn2.jpg/

The specs for the TD04H-13T are a little muddled. There seems to be some confusion over the 13g and 13t. Most recent data sources now quote the wheel size as 55.9mm.

But if you compare the performance of the above with the GT2056 (56mm wheel), just along the 170,000 rpm line then you will see that they are near identical.

Hence, that curve must be for a 55.9mm wheel version.

.


so far , i have found that this is what is presented as true ..

subaru turbo is -----13T/6 WHEEL NO,49377-00017 t master
BMW ----------------13T4 WHEEL NO ,49377-0017 t master ,or MELLET 49189-43400
MITZUBISHI 13T WHEEL NO ,49189-43400 mellet
IVECO 13T/6-----WHEEL NO ,49135-00015mellet
RENAULT DAILY----13T/6---49135-00015mellet
RENAULT MASTER --13T/6--49135-00015mellet

THE 0017 is 56mm--- 40.65mm---- 4mm acording to t master .
whereas mellets 43400 is 51mm---38.3mm--4.7mm,,,which one is this graph for ??

all the other 13t are the 51mm wheel. but the 0015 is a 5.1mm tip height .

in mellet the 56 mm wheel is the 16t diameter spec.

mellet also after some research ,appear to add 1mm to the tip width , i assume this is adding the base plate to the tip to root to add the 1mm .since there are only 2 tip heights in the 13t ..and in t master they are 3.7mm and 4.1mm.


since the graph is headed 13T with no /*
id say its really for the mitzubishi wheel .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus



On 21st Oct, 2010 Paul S said:
This tip height issue MUST be resolved.

So I got the socket set out and took a couple of brand new turbos apart *surprised*



Big difference in overall size, but the tip heights are 3.5mm and 4mm ish.

So I can confirm that the GT1752 has a larger tip height than the GT2056.

This does mean that the Gt1752 will flow more than I previously thought, but it will also lower the pressure ratio at a given speed, so the map will look shorter and fatter.



lmao,now that was funny .. well done paul for resolving that ..something else to notice is the angle of the blades , it looks like the steeper angle on the 17 .this tends to go with higher boost designs .also ,speed up the wheel to give the same tip speed and youl find the map extending upwards again .

Edited by robert on 21st Oct, 2010.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Robert, do you have any figures for the 13G wheel, as this would probably be more akin to the Gt1752

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


GT1752:



GT2056:

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

is the same casting no on both wheels?

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 21st Oct, 2010 Joe C said:
is the same casting no on both wheels?


I can't see any numbers 8-)

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

there is a bar code

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

top pic, 3 digits under the black marker pen.

http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l154/min...06/DSC00616.jpg

Edited by Joe C on 21st Oct, 2010.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

you'd do anything to be right
turbomaster catalog have a lot of misinformation:
this is the real part number from both my vnt2052 audi's
and gt1752s:
http://www.melett.com/turbo-buildsheets.ph...-0002&Submit=Go

That's it this compressor does flow nothing more than 23lb at 1.2 bar= about 200 a-series bhp

cheers
fab


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Right lets open a book on this. Closest to the average wins

1. Robert - 260hp
2. Paul S - 230hp
3. fab - 200hp

Any more for any more *Rofl!*

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus



On 21st Oct, 2010 fab said:
you'd do anything to be right
turbomaster catalog have a lot of misinformation:
this is the real part number from both my vnt2052 audi's
and gt1752s:
http://www.melett.com/turbo-buildsheets.ph...-0002&Submit=Go

That's it this compressor does flow nothing more than 23lb at 1.2 bar= about 200 a-series bhp

cheers
fab


haha ,i think its more id do anything to find out im wrong !proving one is right at all costs is not the way to progress ..


heres the wheel i think your map is based on ..

http://www.melett.com/turbo-buildsheet-det...510&partno=audi

tip height on it from root is 3mm ,so its a lesser flowing wheel .,and should in fact more closely replicate pauls downsized 56 map , since they have similar tip heights.


''That's it this compressor does flow nothing more than 23lb at 1.2 bar= about 200 a-series bhp''


do you think the saab tuners i posted links for earlier are both lying ?




Edited by robert on 21st Oct, 2010.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

There is also the issue that you need a VE of at least 105% to get 260hp from 21 psi boost.

:(

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

as audi's s4 tuners find more than 360 hp from his original turbocharger 45mm one....


On 21st Oct, 2010 robert said:


On 21st Oct, 2010 fab said:
you'd do anything to be right
turbomaster catalog have a lot of misinformation:
this is the real part number from both my vnt2052 audi's
and gt1752s:
http://www.melett.com/turbo-buildsheets.ph...-0002&Submit=Go

That's it this compressor does flow nothing more than 23lb at 1.2 bar= about 200 a-series bhp

cheers
fab


haha ,i think its more id do anything to find out im wrong !proving one is right at all costs is not the way to progress ..


heres the wheel i think your map is based on ..

http://www.melett.com/turbo-buildsheet-det...510&partno=audi

tip height on it from root is 3mm ,so its a lesser flowing wheel .,and should in fact more closely replicate pauls downsized 56 map , since they have similar tip heights.


''That's it this compressor does flow nothing more than 23lb at 1.2 bar= about 200 a-series bhp''


do you think the saab tuners i posted links for earlier are both lying ?





robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

another bit of info , for the open minded ..
heres a link to a dynapak run ,using a 2052 vnt , i assume the 1752 4.1mm tip wheel from the output .dynapak being one of the few rr's id say come close to being accurate .

http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=297085


190 bhp atw ,,. now i tend to use a 2/3 power conversion from diesel to petrol .so this 190bhp would transfer to 285 bhp on petrol ...

this is not a hard and fast conversion ,and is way higher than my estimate ,,

but its food for thought ..if a diesel is making 190 atw from this wheel ,then on petrol it will be considerably more ...

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

Robert I'm very open minded!
but not blind,
you mean saab tuners are sorting 260 dyno power from a compressor wheel that is smaller(55 trim) than the gt2252 60 trim which is already just at the limit at these numbers.
saab are already genuily bad tuners .. they're using a compressor wheel a lot too big for their application?
one dyno power run isn't a stable database, that's what i think.
a good ex, I din't meant that the s4 hasn't been dynoed at 360 bananas, it's just difficult to understand how they extract more power than the compressor wheel can feed, appart from outreving it out of efficiency, a map showing a last curve at 65% doesn't mean that you cannot take from your compressor a bit more and fail is ne the 60/55/50%.

Anyway this 52mm compressor is really in the ball park and very efficient for a-serie application.



On 21st Oct, 2010 robert said:


On 21st Oct, 2010 fab said:
you'd do anything to be right
turbomaster catalog have a lot of misinformation:
this is the real part number from both my vnt2052 audi's
and gt1752s:
http://www.melett.com/turbo-buildsheets.ph...-0002&Submit=Go

That's it this compressor does flow nothing more than 23lb at 1.2 bar= about 200 a-series bhp

cheers
fab


haha ,i think its more id do anything to find out im wrong !proving one is right at all costs is not the way to progress ..


heres the wheel i think your map is based on ..

http://www.melett.com/turbo-buildsheet-det...510&partno=audi

tip height on it from root is 3mm ,so its a lesser flowing wheel .,and should in fact more closely replicate pauls downsized 56 map , since they have similar tip heights.


''That's it this compressor does flow nothing more than 23lb at 1.2 bar= about 200 a-series bhp''


do you think the saab tuners i posted links for earlier are both lying ?





fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb




[quote=robert,20th Oct, 2010]thought id put up my latest on this pesky little critttur ..

gt1752 specs ,


part no ----------dia-----inducer------tip ht--shaft dia ----trim

436131-0002-- 52,00--- 38,55------ 4,10------ 5,00---------55

so i did a bit of a research ,and thought , i wonder if i can find a comp map that , whilst not identical ,has as similar measurements on the wheel as possible ..

so i found this ..

---dia-----inducer------tip ht--shaft dia ----trim

- 51,00--- 38,25------- 4,25--- 4,90--------- 56

which gives this map ..




and calcs to around 268 bhp max flow .





After a bit of investigation, I shouldn't have tokk this as is:
This is NOT the 51mm 13t wheel

This is the 56mm scooby compressor wheel.

good try *happy*


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Fab, I think that was what I said, but you may not have read it that way.


On 21st Oct, 2010 Paul S said:
This is the official version of the map:

http://img280.imageshack.us/f/13tcompressormapsn2.jpg/

The specs for the TD04H-13T are a little muddled. There seems to be some confusion over the 13g and 13t. Most recent data sources now quote the wheel size as 55.9mm.

But if you compare the performance of the above with the GT2056 (56mm wheel), just along the 170,000 rpm line then you will see that they are near identical.

Hence, that curve must be for a 55.9mm wheel version.

Following the affinity laws, the flow from a 52mm wheel of the same trim would be around 15% lower.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

Are we saying that the TD04 will pump enough air for the bananas that Nic has, but the GT17will not pump the air for the bananas that Robers has?

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 22nd Oct, 2010 wil_h said:
Are we saying that the TD04 will pump enough air for the bananas that Nic has, but the GT17will not pump the air for the bananas that Robers has?


Yes.

We are actually talking horsepower but the recent abundance of bananas has fuddled Robert.

Edited by Paul S on 22nd Oct, 2010.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

Nic already have a bigger one than that..
a lot bigger!!


cossierick

User Avatar

3074 Posts
Member #: 1348
Post Whore

wakefield West Yorks

So whats the 2056 going to do ??? against the 17

Rick

ps, i am very confused by all this but trying to understand as much as i can.


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

I too would like to know as I have a GT2056 and can't decide whether I should chop it in against a GT1752 or even a Saab 9-3 TD04 *wink*

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


quinton

User Avatar

338 Posts
Member #: 1911
Senior Member

Swindon

From my understanding the same as a gt17 but with more capability further up.




http://photobucket.com/quintonrose

Home > Technical Chat > gt17 latest thinking .
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: