Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > ReshellIng into another shell. Is it legal?

Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 10th Feb, 2011 wolfie said:
My new shell never came with a heritage certificate, it was made by rover not bmh sold though minisport.


On 10th Feb, 2011 Rod S said:
If it was a Heritage shell, the seller should have the certificate from BMH which makes it 100% legal.

If not, although the current rules say it has to be a brand new shell, the rules were different 16 or more years ago so it would depend on when it was done (but it would have to be a very long time ago to justify it).


So far as I'm aware, the BMH shells have certificates. So that makes proof dead easy.

If yours was a new Rover shell (sold through Minisport) then the sales receipt would be the same "proof" that it was sold as a new shell.

That's all the current rules require, proof that it is/was a new shell.

But the rules were different 16-17 years ago and shells were't stamped back then so much harder to prove, and the place they did start stamping them mid 80s is on one of the panels that often gets replaced through rust........

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Stig

397 Posts
Member #: 694
Senior Member

Shropshire

erm ok where should it be stamped then?


wez

1226 Posts
Member #: 9271
Post Whore

Stoke on Trent

They were stamped in the bonnet gutter on the scuttle panel I think ( been a while, may be wrong).

one day boost will be mine!

On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each...


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

As above, towards the driver side end of the channel.

But only from about 83-84 onwards and it's a panel that is often replaced.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

That's a really odd mix of stuff. It's plainly not a reshelled mk1, just a Mk5 with a mk1 V5C. Looking at some bits it looks even newer than '88.

As I said before. Ask if he still has the original V5C and just change it back.

I wouldn't be happy owning it with a '64 V5. The original V5 would be best, but any late '80s V5 would be better, even if it's no less wrong.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Rob Gavin

User Avatar

6729 Posts
Member #: 618
Post Whore

Glasgow

don't the brackets on the bulkhead make it an early injection shell?

anyhow, I can't see anything on the car that relates to a 64 car if it has been re-shelled.


Monster22

User Avatar

428 Posts
Member #: 39
Senior Member

Bristol

If your interested give him £50 scratch the paint back somewhere and your find the original colour or primer... job done...

Like someone said before 90% of minis that are tax exempt aren't original.


Stig

397 Posts
Member #: 694
Senior Member

Shropshire

Cheers chap I think I will look else where but all useful info none the less


oli79

User Avatar

1713 Posts
Member #: 8480
MS Paint flat cap champion & Morris Ital Lover

From Sheffield now live in York tha noz

Would even say thats an spi/carb auto mk6 shell, bracket with relays on the bulkhead and spi engine with spi only oil pipe on the front!

oli

On 18th Oct, 2013 apbellamy said:
I am feeling particularly BACish today.

On 5th Oct, 2014 Shauna said:
What that's crazy, you go commando hahaha! How heavy is your helmet *tongue*?

The Morris Ital assassin!


wolfie

User Avatar

8215 Posts
Member #: 90
Post Whore

Somewhere around Swindon

my shell has no numbers stamped into it.

Crystal Sound Audio said:

Why wolfie...you should have your name as Fuckfaceshithead !


"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."-Douglas Adams


wez

1226 Posts
Member #: 9271
Post Whore

Stoke on Trent

Is it not up to the powers that be to prove your car is illegal rather than you having to prove it is legal?????

one day boost will be mine!

On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each...


Mini_the_minx

User Avatar

716 Posts
Member #: 9077
Post Whore

Cheshire

How hard would it be to prove that isn't a mk1, really.

On 2nd Nov, 2010 wil_h said:
I think it's probably a given that all people who own pink cars like it up the Gary.

On 14th Jan, 2011 rubicon said:

please dont put a batty kit on it, il have to by internet law, Report you to barry boys.com


wez

1226 Posts
Member #: 9271
Post Whore

Stoke on Trent

I think anyone with eyes knows that aint a mk1. I just meant in general as other people have mentioned there cars etc. Also although it is blatantly alot newer than 88, doesnt mean the shell was not purchased from rover, after all no one has actually asked the seller, people have just presumed its been done dodgy. Could of been a typo and he meant 98 shell......

Edited by wez on 11th Feb, 2011.

one day boost will be mine!

On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each...


tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

When it comes right down to it, anyone who knows minis knows that this is not an early mini, so whats the satisfaction in owning it - just evading road tax I guess.


Stig

397 Posts
Member #: 694
Senior Member

Shropshire

I think that is a bit harsh yes it's been reshelled, but it's a lot of mini for the money. Looks solid and has a decent amount of upgrades.

However it's no resto example that's for sure. But if your want it for a fun weekend warrior then it's fine


Mini_the_minx

User Avatar

716 Posts
Member #: 9077
Post Whore

Cheshire

But at the end of the day it actually looks illegal and with something as blatant as that I think it would be you that would need to prove that it was what it was, not the other way around.

I can't actually see anything mk1 about that car.

On 2nd Nov, 2010 wil_h said:
I think it's probably a given that all people who own pink cars like it up the Gary.

On 14th Jan, 2011 rubicon said:

please dont put a batty kit on it, il have to by internet law, Report you to barry boys.com


Lot

112 Posts
Member #: 7030
Advanced Member

Bucks

The front arches look sportspack-ish or it might just be with the trim making it look that way.

Insurers could use question mark over the identity to refuse a claim, DVLA could bring it in for a VIC test and remove the identity and it would have to IVA'd it to get it back on the road again (hello Q plates).

Expensive - have to pay for IVA and then road tax all on a car that just became worth less.

If the owner doesn't provide the right answers when the obvious questions are asked about the re-shelling then better to walk away.

Don't be a mug.


D4VE

User Avatar

2975 Posts
Member #: 10749
Post Whore

lowestoft suffolk

Whats peoples opinions on this now days? Cos theres TONS of minis out there (and on hear tbh) and in one of my garages too AND in the mags, i have never heard of anyone getting caught/been in trouble/had to prove anything

On 24th Oct, 2015 jonny f said:
Nothing gets past Dave lol

NOTHING GETS PAST ME!! *tongue*

1/4 mile 14.7 @ 96mph 12psi boost
Showdown class A 2nd place 18.6 @ 69mph


Shauna

User Avatar

1043 Posts
Member #: 10424
Post Whore

Swansea boyo!

I just feel sorry for the people who are buying a ringer and don't know the difference between a mk1 shell and a late 80s. It's those kind that bother me. There was a mini with a tax exempt plate on eBay last week described as 'exact sportspack replica' yeah right! Sometimes shells are too far gone but at least replace it with one a similar age!

They don't die, they just get faster!


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

My thoughts are always:

1) Why not just use the reg of the new shell?
2) If not why are you reshelling?
3) If you are changing, say, a no-history-run-of-the-mill mk5 shell to a similar mk5 shell as it's less work than rebuilding the one you have, then fine, no one will know, or care.
4) If you are rebuilding a piece of paper for historical (and likely monetary gain) that is clear fraud.

There is obviously similarity between 3 and 4, but with 3 you're not trying to pass something off as something it's not, it's not unsafe and it saves a mini (possibly).

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

I've kept my logbook as it's my first car, just got another shell with the age a year newer and got rid of the old one with the new logbook, no harm done. It was only because it was my first car that I did that, otherwise I wouldn't have bothered.

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


Shauna

User Avatar

1043 Posts
Member #: 10424
Post Whore

Swansea boyo!

Number 1 is mostly for the tax exemption? Surely older minis (and other models of cars) are more desirable too and valuable too. I still see a few adverts on ebay that are clearly people just selling logbooks!



On 5th Oct, 2014 wil_h said:
My thoughts are always:

1) Why not just use the reg of the new shell?
2) If not why are you reshelling?
3) If you are changing, say, a no-history-run-of-the-mill mk5 shell to a similar mk5 shell as it's less work than rebuilding the one you have, then fine, no one will know, or care.
4) If you are rebuilding a piece of paper for historical (and likely monetary gain) that is clear fraud.

There is obviously similarity between 3 and 4, but with 3 you're not trying to pass something off as something it's not, it's not unsafe and it saves a mini (possibly).

They don't die, they just get faster!


D4VE

User Avatar

2975 Posts
Member #: 10749
Post Whore

lowestoft suffolk

Doing a ringer to trick someone or make money is wrong in my eyes yes, especially if the buyer is someone who doesnt know difference. But im talking about the ones out there that arent trying to hide anything they clearly state that its not its original shell so not for a purist, or on the other hand where someone is building a new project.. has a bare shell with no i.d whatsoever so when finding a logbook to use most people would go for choosing the one that gets you out of a few things mot wise and free road tax?

Edited by D4VE on 5th Oct, 2014.

On 24th Oct, 2015 jonny f said:
Nothing gets past Dave lol

NOTHING GETS PAST ME!! *tongue*

1/4 mile 14.7 @ 96mph 12psi boost
Showdown class A 2nd place 18.6 @ 69mph


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

That's my point really. People are not just reshelling because their shell in knackered, they are reshelling logbooks to make a fast buck. This is not acceptable, but I accept it happens. Where it is really unacceptable is when a historic car of significant value is rebuilt.

On 5th Oct, 2014 Shauna said:
Number 1 is mostly for the tax exemption? Surely older minis (and other models of cars) are more desirable too and valuable too. I still see a few adverts on ebay that are clearly people just selling logbooks!



On 5th Oct, 2014 wil_h said:
My thoughts are always:

1) Why not just use the reg of the new shell?
2) If not why are you reshelling?
3) If you are changing, say, a no-history-run-of-the-mill mk5 shell to a similar mk5 shell as it's less work than rebuilding the one you have, then fine, no one will know, or care.
4) If you are rebuilding a piece of paper for historical (and likely monetary gain) that is clear fraud.

There is obviously similarity between 3 and 4, but with 3 you're not trying to pass something off as something it's not, it's not unsafe and it saves a mini (possibly).

Edited by wil_h on 5th Oct, 2014.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Shauna

User Avatar

1043 Posts
Member #: 10424
Post Whore

Swansea boyo!

Things like this are really naughty too! http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/morris-mini-1000...=item486fbd002c

They don't die, they just get faster!

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > ReshellIng into another shell. Is it legal?
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: