| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > ReshellIng into another shell. Is it legal? | |||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
10th Feb, 2011 at 11:15:41pm
On 10th Feb, 2011 wolfie said:
My new shell never came with a heritage certificate, it was made by rover not bmh sold though minisport. On 10th Feb, 2011 Rod S said: If it was a Heritage shell, the seller should have the certificate from BMH which makes it 100% legal. If not, although the current rules say it has to be a brand new shell, the rules were different 16 or more years ago so it would depend on when it was done (but it would have to be a very long time ago to justify it). So far as I'm aware, the BMH shells have certificates. So that makes proof dead easy. If yours was a new Rover shell (sold through Minisport) then the sales receipt would be the same "proof" that it was sold as a new shell. That's all the current rules require, proof that it is/was a new shell. But the rules were different 16-17 years ago and shells were't stamped back then so much harder to prove, and the place they did start stamping them mid 80s is on one of the panels that often gets replaced through rust........ Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
|
397 Posts Member #: 694 Senior Member Shropshire |
10th Feb, 2011 at 11:36:28pm
erm ok where should it be stamped then? |
||||||
|
1226 Posts Member #: 9271 Post Whore Stoke on Trent |
11th Feb, 2011 at 06:39:01am
They were stamped in the bonnet gutter on the scuttle panel I think ( been a while, may be wrong). one day boost will be mine!
On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each... |
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
11th Feb, 2011 at 08:09:32am
As above, towards the driver side end of the channel.
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
11th Feb, 2011 at 08:16:27am
That's a really odd mix of stuff. It's plainly not a reshelled mk1, just a Mk5 with a mk1 V5C. Looking at some bits it looks even newer than '88.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
![]() 6729 Posts Member #: 618 Post Whore Glasgow |
11th Feb, 2011 at 09:39:28am
don't the brackets on the bulkhead make it an early injection shell?
|
||||||
![]() 428 Posts Member #: 39 Senior Member Bristol |
11th Feb, 2011 at 12:39:59pm
If your interested give him £50 scratch the paint back somewhere and your find the original colour or primer... job done...
|
||||||
|
397 Posts Member #: 694 Senior Member Shropshire |
11th Feb, 2011 at 04:59:07pm
Cheers chap I think I will look else where but all useful info none the less |
||||||
|
1713 Posts Member #: 8480 MS Paint flat cap champion & Morris Ital Lover From Sheffield now live in York tha noz |
11th Feb, 2011 at 05:37:20pm
Would even say thats an spi/carb auto mk6 shell, bracket with relays on the bulkhead and spi engine with spi only oil pipe on the front!
On 18th Oct, 2013 apbellamy said:
I am feeling particularly BACish today. On 5th Oct, 2014 Shauna said:
What that's crazy, you go commando hahaha! How heavy is your helmet ? The Morris Ital assassin! |
||||||
|
8215 Posts Member #: 90 Post Whore Somewhere around Swindon |
11th Feb, 2011 at 05:42:05pm
my shell has no numbers stamped into it. Crystal Sound Audio said:
Why wolfie...you should have your name as Fuckfaceshithead ! "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."-Douglas Adams |
||||||
|
1226 Posts Member #: 9271 Post Whore Stoke on Trent |
11th Feb, 2011 at 05:47:37pm
Is it not up to the powers that be to prove your car is illegal rather than you having to prove it is legal????? one day boost will be mine!
On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each... |
||||||
![]() 716 Posts Member #: 9077 Post Whore Cheshire |
11th Feb, 2011 at 06:12:57pm
How hard would it be to prove that isn't a mk1, really. On 2nd Nov, 2010 wil_h said:
I think it's probably a given that all people who own pink cars like it up the Gary. On 14th Jan, 2011 rubicon said:
please dont put a batty kit on it, il have to by internet law, Report you to barry boys.com |
||||||
|
1226 Posts Member #: 9271 Post Whore Stoke on Trent |
11th Feb, 2011 at 06:18:40pm
I think anyone with eyes knows that aint a mk1. I just meant in general as other people have mentioned there cars etc. Also although it is blatantly alot newer than 88, doesnt mean the shell was not purchased from rover, after all no one has actually asked the seller, people have just presumed its been done dodgy. Could of been a typo and he meant 98 shell...... Edited by wez on 11th Feb, 2011. one day boost will be mine!
On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each... |
||||||
|
3006 Posts Member #: 2500 Post Whore Buckinghamshire |
11th Feb, 2011 at 07:47:53pm
When it comes right down to it, anyone who knows minis knows that this is not an early mini, so whats the satisfaction in owning it - just evading road tax I guess. |
||||||
|
397 Posts Member #: 694 Senior Member Shropshire |
12th Feb, 2011 at 08:16:00am
I think that is a bit harsh yes it's been reshelled, but it's a lot of mini for the money. Looks solid and has a decent amount of upgrades.
|
||||||
![]() 716 Posts Member #: 9077 Post Whore Cheshire |
12th Feb, 2011 at 09:04:29am
But at the end of the day it actually looks illegal and with something as blatant as that I think it would be you that would need to prove that it was what it was, not the other way around.
On 2nd Nov, 2010 wil_h said:
I think it's probably a given that all people who own pink cars like it up the Gary. On 14th Jan, 2011 rubicon said:
please dont put a batty kit on it, il have to by internet law, Report you to barry boys.com |
||||||
|
112 Posts Member #: 7030 Advanced Member Bucks |
12th Feb, 2011 at 09:12:33am
The front arches look sportspack-ish or it might just be with the trim making it look that way.
|
||||||
![]() 2975 Posts Member #: 10749 Post Whore lowestoft suffolk |
4th Oct, 2014 at 11:58:11pm
Whats peoples opinions on this now days? Cos theres TONS of minis out there (and on hear tbh) and in one of my garages too AND in the mags, i have never heard of anyone getting caught/been in trouble/had to prove anything On 24th Oct, 2015 jonny f said:
Nothing gets past Dave lol NOTHING GETS PAST ME!!
1/4 mile 14.7 @ 96mph 12psi boost Showdown class A 2nd place 18.6 @ 69mph |
||||||
![]() 1043 Posts Member #: 10424 Post Whore Swansea boyo! |
5th Oct, 2014 at 08:04:40am
I just feel sorry for the people who are buying a ringer and don't know the difference between a mk1 shell and a late 80s. It's those kind that bother me. There was a mini with a tax exempt plate on eBay last week described as 'exact sportspack replica' yeah right! Sometimes shells are too far gone but at least replace it with one a similar age! They don't die, they just get faster! |
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
5th Oct, 2014 at 08:45:30am
My thoughts are always:
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
5th Oct, 2014 at 09:22:48am
I've kept my logbook as it's my first car, just got another shell with the age a year newer and got rid of the old one with the new logbook, no harm done. It was only because it was my first car that I did that, otherwise I wouldn't have bothered. On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
![]() 1043 Posts Member #: 10424 Post Whore Swansea boyo! |
5th Oct, 2014 at 09:50:47am
Number 1 is mostly for the tax exemption? Surely older minis (and other models of cars) are more desirable too and valuable too. I still see a few adverts on ebay that are clearly people just selling logbooks!
On 5th Oct, 2014 wil_h said:
My thoughts are always: 1) Why not just use the reg of the new shell? 2) If not why are you reshelling? 3) If you are changing, say, a no-history-run-of-the-mill mk5 shell to a similar mk5 shell as it's less work than rebuilding the one you have, then fine, no one will know, or care. 4) If you are rebuilding a piece of paper for historical (and likely monetary gain) that is clear fraud. There is obviously similarity between 3 and 4, but with 3 you're not trying to pass something off as something it's not, it's not unsafe and it saves a mini (possibly). They don't die, they just get faster! |
||||||
![]() 2975 Posts Member #: 10749 Post Whore lowestoft suffolk |
5th Oct, 2014 at 09:53:35am
Doing a ringer to trick someone or make money is wrong in my eyes yes, especially if the buyer is someone who doesnt know difference. But im talking about the ones out there that arent trying to hide anything they clearly state that its not its original shell so not for a purist, or on the other hand where someone is building a new project.. has a bare shell with no i.d whatsoever so when finding a logbook to use most people would go for choosing the one that gets you out of a few things mot wise and free road tax? Edited by D4VE on 5th Oct, 2014. On 24th Oct, 2015 jonny f said:
Nothing gets past Dave lol NOTHING GETS PAST ME!!
1/4 mile 14.7 @ 96mph 12psi boost Showdown class A 2nd place 18.6 @ 69mph |
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
5th Oct, 2014 at 01:58:07pm
That's my point really. People are not just reshelling because their shell in knackered, they are reshelling logbooks to make a fast buck. This is not acceptable, but I accept it happens. Where it is really unacceptable is when a historic car of significant value is rebuilt.
On 5th Oct, 2014 Shauna said:
Number 1 is mostly for the tax exemption? Surely older minis (and other models of cars) are more desirable too and valuable too. I still see a few adverts on ebay that are clearly people just selling logbooks! On 5th Oct, 2014 wil_h said: My thoughts are always: 1) Why not just use the reg of the new shell? 2) If not why are you reshelling? 3) If you are changing, say, a no-history-run-of-the-mill mk5 shell to a similar mk5 shell as it's less work than rebuilding the one you have, then fine, no one will know, or care. 4) If you are rebuilding a piece of paper for historical (and likely monetary gain) that is clear fraud. There is obviously similarity between 3 and 4, but with 3 you're not trying to pass something off as something it's not, it's not unsafe and it saves a mini (possibly). Edited by wil_h on 5th Oct, 2014. Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
![]() 1043 Posts Member #: 10424 Post Whore Swansea boyo! |
5th Oct, 2014 at 02:37:49pm
Things like this are really naughty too! http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/morris-mini-1000...=item486fbd002c They don't die, they just get faster! |
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > ReshellIng into another shell. Is it legal? | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |



? 


