Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > Technical Chat > Monocoque construction using aluminium honeycomb

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Also found this:

http://www.ejot.co.uk/ejotdownloads/FDS.pdf

I wonder how thin the sheet can be for these screws to be effective.

Edited by Paul S on 6th Oct, 2012.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

How about spot welding it?

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


Sir Yun

User Avatar

510 Posts
Member #: 1592
Smart Guy!

mainland europe near ze germans

that fastener seems to turn the plate into a tapped ''insert'' by compressing the sheet quite a bit ( in the process hardening it as well i guess)

The same company has a fastener for thin sheet ''sheetracs'' I have noticed.

maybe this is of use :
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=5017

Why not use a fully composite panel? bonding composite to composite might be ''easier''

That sir, is not rust, it is the progressive mass reduction system

http://aseriesmodifications.wordpress.com/


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 6th Oct, 2012 matty said:
How about spot welding it?


Not an option as I'm talking about the very thin surface of a honeycomb sandwich plate over an inch thick at the healboard.

Edited by Paul S on 7th Oct, 2012.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 6th Oct, 2012 Sir Yun said:

maybe this is of use :
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=5017

Why not use a fully composite panel? bonding composite to composite might be ''easier''



I prefer the idea of aluminium sandwich construction at this stage. Going fully composite is a big step on.

I'd read that thread on the F1tech site the other day. They seem to be filleting the folds in the sandwich with carbon tape. I would prefer to use some thin aluminium strips and anti-peel rivets.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 7th Oct, 2012 Paul S said:
On 6th Oct, 2012 matty said:
How about spot welding it?


Not an option as I'm talking about the very thin surface of a honeycomb sandwich plate over an inch thick at the healboard.



That's an oven brazed structure. I would't be surprised if could buy that in sheet, surely easier and more reliable to just buy it and cut it to any shape and size you wanted?

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 7th Oct, 2012 Sprocket said:

That's an oven brazed structure. I would't be surprised if could buy that in sheet, surely easier and more reliable to just buy it and cut it to any shape and size you wanted?


The picture was intended to represent a bonded structure with the honeycomb glued to the facing sheets, but that's not the issue. Cutting it to size and shape is easy. Joining the pieces together to form a chassis is where it gets complicated.

I'm now sold on the idea of DIY glueing, but as Jean suggests, it would be a good idea to do some load testing of some glued joints before proceding.

Just need some offcuts.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

yep gluing....

bondage is by far the best way...

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



steve w

User Avatar

656 Posts
Member #: 1917
AKA chargedzetec

Milton Keynes

You also need to consider that inserts will need to be put into the core to allow bolting up of structural pieces. You can't just bolt through the core.
Are you planning on taking one piece of core, notching out the inner skin and folding the outer skin until the inner meets up again? Keeping the outside of the joint intact? (this makes sense in my head, even if I haven't described it well!?)
Also, as a side note. 3m 9323 breaks down above 80degrees, so radiant heat may be a consideration.

This is FORD country, on a quiet day you can hear Vauxhalls rusting.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 7th Oct, 2012 steve w said:
You also need to consider that inserts will need to be put into the core to allow bolting up of structural pieces. You can't just bolt through the core.


There is some detail of suitable inserts in the Cardiff Racing write up linked above.

However, for something like the rear radius arms, I was thinking along the lines of bonding and riveting a large thick plate to the sandwich plate to spread the load over a larger area. Same for the cage mounts etc.

On 7th Oct, 2012 steve w said:
Are you planning on taking one piece of core, notching out the inner skin and folding the outer skin until the inner meets up again? Keeping the outside of the joint intact? (this makes sense in my head, even if I haven't described it well!?)


Yes, imagine the floor being a series of longitudinal folds to construct the cills and exhaust tunnel. Angle plates bonded at the inside of the fold.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury




On 7th Oct, 2012 Paul S said:
On 6th Oct, 2012 matty said:
How about spot welding it?


Not an option as I'm talking about the very thin surface of a honeycomb sandwich plate over an inch thick at the healboard.



Ah I though you were using preformed honeycomb and wanting to join it to sheet. I remember watching a program on the building of the new McClaren road car and they were using a 2 part epoxy adhesive for bonding the chassis together. Maybe worth contacting one of the specialist Lotus repair centres if they use the same bonding method, they may be able to give you details of the adhesive they use?

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


Johnny

User Avatar

1183 Posts
Member #: 6926
Post Whore

Accrington

usually when we build the carbon honeycomb and we need a bolt to go thorough they put potting in the honeycomb before the top layer is in place. and for rivets they cut a circular area in the honeycomb and put a titanium cup there and put the top layer on. as you can drill through the cup and you have a secure plate to rivet to.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Certainly need to think about how to attach load bearing components.

Anyway the 13.7mm thick 2.5m by 1.25m sheets with 0.5mm facings cost £280 each plus delivery. Will need two of them, so it aint cheap stuff.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Got a sample of the 1/2" sheet:



That's 10cm square and weighs just 40g, so it's around a third of the weight of the same size piece of 16swg steel sheet, but much, much stiffer :)

Apparently Solidworks Simulation can do stress analysis of this type of material and it should be realtively easy to produce a simple 3d model of a floor pan and roll cage.

So the plan is to see if this stuff is strong enough with the 0.5mm facings in the first instance.

Then we just need to develop and test a bonding system that makes joins as strong as the base material.

Edited by Paul S on 9th Oct, 2012.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


steve w

User Avatar

656 Posts
Member #: 1917
AKA chargedzetec

Milton Keynes




On 8th Oct, 2012 Johnny said:
usually when we build the carbon honeycomb and we need a bolt to go thorough they put potting in the honeycomb before the top layer is in place.


Hmmmmm, what a nice structural solution??? Although I've heard of worse!

This is FORD country, on a quiet day you can hear Vauxhalls rusting.


Johnny

User Avatar

1183 Posts
Member #: 6926
Post Whore

Accrington

well how would you fill in the gaps in the honeycomb? if you dont use something in there, it crushes the honeycomb. ive seen it. that was a very expensive piece of scrap (£100,000.00). someone diddnt check for voids.


steve w

User Avatar

656 Posts
Member #: 1917
AKA chargedzetec

Milton Keynes

Remove the core where the hole goes through, and depending on the fixing, fit a solid carbon or ally insert. Then laminate the inner skin.
Therefore you have a bonded solid insert, opposed to a filled piece of core.

Been there done it.

This is FORD country, on a quiet day you can hear Vauxhalls rusting.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Now have a floorpan layout in Solidworks:



It knows it's a honeycomb sandwich as well, although I need to sort out the exact material properties.

I now need to add a rollcage that links all the main load points together.

Should then be able to apply some loads and see where I need to add extra strength.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


steve w

User Avatar

656 Posts
Member #: 1917
AKA chargedzetec

Milton Keynes

Im really interested in this. I know how stiff thicker sections of flat honeycomb are, but have never bothered to fold them up.
It'll be interesting to see how the shaping effects it.
Keep us posted!

This is FORD country, on a quiet day you can hear Vauxhalls rusting.


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

I look forward to see how this goes.

How many sections do you have in the curved shape? That looks like it would be quite a job to do.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Just the rear arches are curved, but I'm not even sure that they need to be in sandwich yet. I'm going to try to make the arches take coil-overs so the rear weight will be taken at the top of the arch. The honeycomb arches may provide some added reinforcement but it may be simpler construction to add some box section around the supports and do the arches in simple sheet.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


carl talbot

326 Posts
Member #: 1323
Senior Member

why not fit horizontal coilovers in the rear footwells and therefore do away with any need for structural build at the rear - the trailing arms/beam lends itself to this .

there is also no need for rear structure if you feed the top of the vertical mounted coilover into the rear brace legs of the cage , which are then triangulated back to the base of the main hoop and linked with the harness bar -

Edited by carl talbot on 11th Oct, 2012.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 11th Oct, 2012 carl talbot said:
why not fit horizontal coilovers in the rear footwells and therefore do away with any need for structural build at the rear - the trailing arms/beam lends itself to this .


I have thought about different rear suspension options, including my favourite of torsion bars. However, I was trying to stay with what is readily available without adding a lot more design and fabrication. Some nice CNC alloy radius arms fitted directly to a heavily reinforced healboard and off the shelf coilovers would do nicely.

Even if I do not need to use a rear structure, the honeycomb panel would still be lighter than using 16swg aluminium sheet to partition things off. Plus it wont drum.

On 11th Oct, 2012 carl talbot said:
if you feed the top of the vertical mounted coilover into the rear brace legs of the cage , which are then triangulated back to the base of the main hoop and linked with the harness bar -


That is the plan, although the base of the triangle would be the floorpan.

Struggling with trying to box in the cills in honeycomb at the moment.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


carl talbot

326 Posts
Member #: 1323
Senior Member




On 11th Oct, 2012 Paul S said:

On 11th Oct, 2012 carl talbot said:
why not fit horizontal coilovers in the rear footwells and therefore do away with any need for structural build at the rear - the trailing arms/beam lends itself to this .


I have thought about different rear suspension options, including my favourite of torsion bars. However, I was trying to stay with what is readily available without adding a lot more design and fabrication. Some nice CNC alloy radius arms fitted directly to a heavily reinforced healboard and off the shelf coilovers would do nicely.

Even if I do not need to use a rear structure, the honeycomb panel would still be lighter than using 16swg aluminium sheet to partition things off. Plus it wont drum.

On 11th Oct, 2012 carl talbot said:
if you feed the top of the vertical mounted coilover into the rear brace legs of the cage , which are then triangulated back to the base of the main hoop and linked with the harness bar -


That is the plan, although the base of the triangle would be the floorpan.

Struggling with trying to box in the cills in honeycomb at the moment.


Is this an intellectual exercise or for what use are you planning on building the car -


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I'm asking myself the same question :)

I'd like to say road use, but then we are in the realms of SVA testing, meeting current emissions etc.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."

Home > Technical Chat > Monocoque construction using aluminium honeycomb
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: