Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > General Chat > Shit happens - Rolling Road Piston Failure nearing start up (update 27 Nov 10)

apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

good to see you are cracking on with it again.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

hi buddy, shit about the cam but at least the engine is an easy recovery *wink*

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


Mr Joshua

2496 Posts
Member #: 1954
Post Whore

Luton Bedfordshire

Is that near standard compression ratio for a standard 1275 turbo.

Own the day


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

I get 9.4:1 with a 0cc deck height. If I remember correctly the Omega's sit down the bores on a standard deck. So could be a bit less.

IMHO possibly a touch high for the boost/intercooler you were running Richard.

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


turbominivanman

User Avatar

1105 Posts
Member #: 1504
Post Whore

Westbury, Wiltshire

Yeah guys - crackin on but I'm well pissed off as I took it for granted that my man who sold me the Omega's had flogged me 10 cc pistons which they obviously are not.

When I ordered all my bits from Honeycrock (now closed down), I gave the guy a spec to achieve a static CR of 8.4:1 to run the kind of boost I wanted to.

I clearly took it at face value that the combination of chamber and piston volumes had achieved this.

The CR I have is most likely to have been the cause of det on this engine.

As you say John, 9.4 / 9.5 is WAY too much for this build and spec. I'm surprised it lasted as long to be honest !

In terms of the way forward, I clearly have the cam to sort out which I'm a bit fucked off over as it's only done about 2500 miles but, as you wanted the figures Robert, runs 240lb double springs with 1.5 Avonbar forged rockers - probably not a good combination in hindsight.

I'll change the springs for 180 lb jobs as I clearly dont need the 240's for the kind of revs I'm running (95% of time at less than 6000 rpm).

I'm assuming that despite me 'bedding the cam in for 20 minutes at 2500 rpm' when I first started the engine, the VR1 oil is not to blame ?

What cam choices are contenders ? - stick with the AP2 ? Or go for ST5, MG Metro ?

Oh - and I have a problem with the pistons.

Not only do I need to source a spare piston but they ALL need to be machined out from 8 cc to 14 cc to give me my 8.4 CR so does anyone know if there is enough material to survive the extra heat loading in the crown of what would have originally been a 6 cc cast +.020 Omega to take it to 14 cc ?

Or is the best option just to stump up and buy a set of +.020 14cc cast Omega's at, gulp, £300 (which I'd obviously like to avoid !) ?

Cheers guys.

Richard.

Edited by turbominivanman on 6th Sep, 2010.

Minivanless, but reluctantly happy living with the decision. There'll be another one day.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=minimadmotorman#p/u


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

If you are staying below 6000rpm I'd go for an MG Metro cam or if you want it new get the KC500, I'd also bin off the 1.5's in favour of some 1.3 rollers or some 1.27:1 pressed steel type rockers.

You may lose a bit of outright power but I reckon you will pick up on driveability.

Van will pull in top from 1500rpm with this combo.

As for the pistons I'd be tempted to stump up. As you say not the cheapest option but the safest!

IMHO go for the 14cc +20 Accralites as you will have the dish you need without having to get a set 10cc omega's opened up to 14cc.

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

id got my cast omegas machined out to 15cc richard ,theyve put up with a lot of abuse .

the 240 lbs springs are probalby what has wrecked the cam ,im running 180lbs up to 7200 no probs .

the mg cam seems to work well for little money . you could try it withn and without the 1.5's to see what you prefer .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

You'll probably find that the 10cc cast Omegas sit about 40 thou down the bore on a standard block, so they give about 14cc generally.

Edited by Turbo Phil on 6th Sep, 2010.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


turbominivanman

User Avatar

1105 Posts
Member #: 1504
Post Whore

Westbury, Wiltshire

Cheers guys.

Looks like there's some positive driveability reasons to go for an MG cam on 180 lb springs and pressed 1.27 rockers and then possibly change to the 1.5 forged as you've said Robert, to see what effect this has at a later date maybe.

As for pistons, Adam has a new set of 10 cc cast Omega's in the for sale area which I'm interested in but I'm not sure how far they'd come down the bore as I know my block deck has been skimmed but do not know how much by.

I'll need to measure where the current pistons come to from the deck but from what I can recall last night, it left the 8cc pistons about +.020 down which isn't enough for Adam's pistons which I'll need to get machined.

I'll need to make a decison on Adams 10cc pistons or a new set of 14cc Accralites as you suggest John.

Thanks for the help chaps.

Richard.

Minivanless, but reluctantly happy living with the decision. There'll be another one day.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=minimadmotorman#p/u


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

What about putting another couple of cc's in the cylinder head?

Edited by John on 6th Sep, 2010.

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


turbominivanman

User Avatar

1105 Posts
Member #: 1504
Post Whore

Westbury, Wiltshire

On 6th Sep, 2010 John said:
What about putting another couple of cc's in the cylinder head?

That's a bloody good point John.

I'll take Adam's pistons, work out how far down the bore they come when they're fitted and just work out what else needs to come out the chambers to compensate if it's not as much as .040 as Phil has mentioned above.

I can do that.

Richard.

Minivanless, but reluctantly happy living with the decision. There'll be another one day.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=minimadmotorman#p/u


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

I would question the variance in ratios and the chances of you finding such a high ratio pressed steel rocker is probibly slim.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

Don't think the mg cam is reduced as a drivable type, the phase two is just as drivable:
mg cam make more power before 4500 rpm, the phase 2 start to overtake it after, an 1.5 ramp on the mg will about equal a phase 2 with a trade under 4000 rpm.

The phase two is only a must have when you are using a bag of boost, his long exhaust timing help the lot of these exhaust gas outing, it is when the lost of power stroke (caused by a too early exhaust opening) is compensated by the lessening of power rob of exhaust gas thru this tiny exhaut valve.This also help to spool big turbines as there is more energy left in this exhaust gas charge, the mg cam bit this everywhere else (if only we had a larger exhaust valve.....32mm *happy*)

piston choice is depending of your boost target up to 12 psi engine dependant, the 10cc .02 down the bore and a cleaned head will go very well.
above and a nice set of forged bowls will be better, then you can work on your head heigh to compensate (this also decrease valve shroud and is very good,also allowing you to deck your pistons which is also very good combustion/detonation wise.
Then with a mgcam a set of std turbo springs will be enough to keep al this together.

fa&b

On 6th Sep, 2010 turbominivanman said:
Cheers guys.

Looks like there's some positive driveability reasons to go for an MG cam on 180 lb springs and pressed 1.27 rockers and then possibly change to the 1.5 forged as you've said Robert, to see what effect this has at a later date maybe.

As for pistons, Adam has a new set of 10 cc cast Omega's in the for sale area which I'm interested in but I'm not sure how far they'd come down the bore as I know my block deck has been skimmed but do not know how much by.

I'll need to measure where the current pistons come to from the deck but from what I can recall last night, it left the 8cc pistons about +.020 down which isn't enough for Adam's pistons which I'll need to get machined.

I'll need to make a decison on Adams 10cc pistons or a new set of 14cc Accralites as you suggest John.

Thanks for the help chaps.

Richard.
*happy*


Mr Joshua

2496 Posts
Member #: 1954
Post Whore

Luton Bedfordshire

Why not utilise a cimetic headgasket or solid copper both reliable and widely used and a dmned sight cheaper than a set of pistons.

You can remove a fair fit of material from the chamber roof if you want to keep the chamber shape.

Own the day


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

he still needs to buy pistons as one has a hole in it...

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


turbominivanman

User Avatar

1105 Posts
Member #: 1504
Post Whore

Westbury, Wiltshire

On 6th Sep, 2010 Sprocket said:
I would question the variance in ratios and the chances of you finding such a high ratio pressed steel rocker is probibly slim.

Sprox.

I think I may have misunderstood, can you re-phrase ?

I thought the pressed rockers were 1.25 but John has mentioned 1.27.

I have loads of pressed rockers at home so can easily start off with these instead of re-fitting my ABR 1.5 forged jobs. I can't see the point in forking out for 1.3 roller rockers.

Fab has mentioned that the use of 1.5 rockers with the MG cam might well perform as well as the AP2 up to around 4500 rpm - this is the sort of revs that I'd spend most of the time at so pick up in top from this point would be an important issue for things like overtaking, with excursions beyond this say up to 6000 rpm with 6500 only once in a blue moon. There's just no need as far as I'm concerned.

Cheers.

Richard.

Minivanless, but reluctantly happy living with the decision. There'll be another one day.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=minimadmotorman#p/u


turbominivanman

User Avatar

1105 Posts
Member #: 1504
Post Whore

Westbury, Wiltshire

On 7th Sep, 2010 Mr Joshua said:
Why not utilise a cimetic headgasket or solid copper both reliable and widely used and a dmned sight cheaper than a set of pistons.

You can remove a fair fit of material from the chamber roof if you want to keep the chamber shape.

Rob.

Andy's right on this one. I'm gonna need one new piston anyway and then I'm gonna have to take all pistons off the rods on the other three to machine the bowls out at least another 2 cc to match the new 10cc No 4 piston so I might as well put new 10 cc pistons back on in all 4 positions as I cant be arsed with the hasle tbh !

Dependant on deck height, I'll then work out if the next route is either a Cimetic gasket (good shout btw - ta) or further chamber removal, recognising I already have a new pukka AF470 'Made in England' gasket and the purchase of a Cimetic means extra outlay when chamber mods will cost me nout as I can do these myself.

One things for sure. The motor's going back together with an 8.4 CR this time !!!

Cheers.

Richard.

Minivanless, but reluctantly happy living with the decision. There'll be another one day.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=minimadmotorman#p/u


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

You may be right with the 1.25:1 Richard. I believe Cooper S rockers were supposedly 1.27:1 but rarely achieved it.

All I can say is give it a go. You've seen the vids of our van on the strip with the MG Cam and pressed rockers.

I can also tell you it drives nicely on the road and still pulls to 6k+ with ease.

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


turbominivanman

User Avatar

1105 Posts
Member #: 1504
Post Whore

Westbury, Wiltshire

On 7th Sep, 2010 John said:
You may be right with the 1.25:1 Richard. I believe Cooper S rockers were supposedly 1.27:1 but rarely achieved it.

All I can say is give it a go. You've seen the vids of our van on the strip with the MG Cam and pressed rockers.

I can also tell you it drives nicely on the road and still pulls to 6k+ with ease.

Yep.

Like the proverbial shovel of shit. In the best sense of the expression that is ! However, you have an airflow advantage to your intercooler over my van which only has 3 50 mm holes in the bonnet.

What CR you running John ?

Edited by turbominivanman on 7th Sep, 2010.

Minivanless, but reluctantly happy living with the decision. There'll be another one day.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=minimadmotorman#p/u


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

it's around 8.4:1.

It's very drivable, but bearing mind the intercooler is half covered by the front panel and slam panel. It's probably only got a window of about 20cm x 15cm expossed to airflow...

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

It's actually nearer 8.15:1 *smiley*

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

though an mg cam with 1.27 (inno/1275gt rocks), will also just overtake a lot of thing on the road including subs/integras,
that start to open the can of worms.
I remember an cayman s driver just looking at his radio when we stopped at the red light *tongue*! Then we're just talking about 5/7 bhp against a phase2/mg and 1.5's. My aim as of today would to have a set of 1.3's titans...

On 7th Sep, 2010 turbominivanman said:
On 6th Sep, 2010 Sprocket said:
I would question the variance in ratios and the chances of you finding such a high ratio pressed steel rocker is probibly slim.

Sprox.

I think I may have misunderstood, can you re-phrase ?

I thought the pressed rockers were 1.25 but John has mentioned 1.27.

I have loads of pressed rockers at home so can easily start off with these instead of re-fitting my ABR 1.5 forged jobs. I can't see the point in forking out for 1.3 roller rockers.

Fab has mentioned that the use of 1.5 rockers with the MG cam might well perform as well as the AP2 up to around 4500 rpm - this is the sort of revs that I'd spend most of the time at so pick up in top from this point would be an important issue for things like overtaking, with excursions beyond this say up to 6000 rpm with 6500 only once in a blue moon. There's just no need as far as I'm concerned.

Cheers.

Richard.


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway




On 7th Sep, 2010 John said:
You may be right with the 1.25:1 Richard. I believe Cooper S rockers were supposedly 1.27:1 but rarely achieved it.



Cooper S rockers are supposedly 1,22:1 The lowest of them all.

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

Every day is a school day!

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


Star Mag

User Avatar

1745 Posts
Member #: 375
Post Whore

Leicestershire

The first turbo motor that I built had a mg cam and 1.5:1 rockers, I ran turbo pistons machined with a bigger dish and a de beaked head. Im sure it was around 8.5:1. On 15psi it was a flyer and my favourite engine that I have built to drive on the road! Im sure it ran a low 14 up the strip as well!

Home > General Chat > Shit happens - Rolling Road Piston Failure nearing start up (update 27 Nov 10)
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: