Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > The best turbo for a 998?

jdisel

User Avatar

126 Posts
Member #: 9515
Advanced Member

ireland

Thanks for the links wil
It sounds like alot of tinkering to get it to work, and the gt1544v is definiately too small according to that guys experience with it,
so as paul s said earlier the GT1749V would be better, i wonder what kind of results fitting one would give,

A job worth doing is a job worth over doing


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 9th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:
Never really thought much about VNTs before. Need to walk before running sort of thing.

BUT what worries me is that without a wastegate, all engine exhaust flow has to pass though the turbine. Seeing as we usually only need a fraction of the gas to drive the turbine, is this not going to cause far higher back pressure than is healthy???

Apologies for thread jack.


No, not from what I've seen from dismatling one.

It looks like it's a case of the exhaust gas passing into the turbine vanes at the correct angle, or just being swung over the top of the turbine vanes so straight down the exhaust.

They really boost at very low RPM on diesels, and I do mean very low.

Air mass flow and temperatures are very different on a diesel but I really think VNT is the way forward.

Only immediate problem I can see is the GT17**V diesel ones are oil cooled only, no water jacket. The GT17** petrol ones all seem to be water cooled. Cores aren't interchangable because of the way the VNT actuator mechanism is built into the exhaust side of the core.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Advantage

User Avatar

1137 Posts
Member #: 1450
Post Whore

Near Paris - France

Diesel use vacuum actuation because they are fitted as standart with a vacuum pump in order to have brake assist.

Rusty by nature

On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:

They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!"


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 9th Oct, 2011 Rod S said:
It looks like it's a case of the exhaust gas passing into the turbine vanes at the correct angle, or just being swung over the top of the turbine vanes so straight down the exhaust.



So are you saying that not all the exhaust gas has to pass through the wheel? i.e. not a closed shroud shaped to the wheel profile.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


jdisel

User Avatar

126 Posts
Member #: 9515
Advanced Member

ireland

I spent the day thinking of simple ways to get a vnt turbo to work in a 998 engine and i came up with a rather crude way of controlling the boost when using megesquirt.
Just wondering what ye think of it, wheither it would work or fail miseribly.
Dont be too hard on me if im wrong, still getting to grips with all the turbo stuff, so dont shoot. *happy*

Heres the link to my 3D CAD drawing of my idea *laughing*

http://i1226.photobucket.com/albums/ee420/...1/Untitled1.jpg

Edited by jdisel on 10th Oct, 2011.

A job worth doing is a job worth over doing


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk


On 9th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:
So are you saying that not all the exhaust gas has to pass through the wheel? i.e. not a closed shroud shaped to the wheel profile.

I haven't been able to get the stainless insert out of the large casting yet to exactly how it's profile matches the wheel but if you look at this picture from my other thread


I think it's a case of the exhaust gas either being directed to the centre of the wheel where the angle it hits the blades will be optimum and maximum kinetic and heat energy extracted or directed just at the tips of the blades where the angle will be all wrong, flow path mimimum and little energy extracted.

How much clearance there is around the exit won't be clear until the sleeve is out so it may drop its power output in a very inefficient way (creating un-necissary backpressure) but they seem to have taken reasonable care with the design - for example all the guide vanes are fed from a snail shape within the main casting so they all get equal flow and they are all reasonable aerofoil shape.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

theres somthing about vane angles relating to efficiency in here.

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=we...JLlp-zg&cad=rja

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

Nice find Joe,

It gets interesting from the bottom of page 23 onwards.

At least their diagram matches my photo !!!

Bedtime reading.

I wonder if the Capobianco & Gambarotta (1992) paper is available online :)

Interesting comment about the VNT design being considered poor for the higher temperatures of spark ignition engines (although obviously technology moves onwards and some of this research is quite old now).

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex



http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/Ge...gifs=yes&ref=no

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland




On 10th Oct, 2011 Joe C said:
theres somthing about vane angles relating to efficiency in here.

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=we...JLlp-zg&cad=rja


Interestingly it states that optimum efficiency of the turbine is when inlet flow is tangential to the blade tips and does not vary significantly in the range of -40 to +30 degrees. This is as I always understood the principles of impulse turbines. There may be some reaction in the wheel i.e. power derived from expansion through the wheel, but this is unlikely.

I have a couple of Winterbone books from 2000 and although principally about wave action methods for the design of manifolds, he does show that peak turbine efficiency is achieved when the blade tip speed is about 70% of the gas nozzle outlet velocity.

Edited by Paul S on 10th Oct, 2011.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

I think at that point the link is talking about constant flow, (only skim read it)


bit more bed time reading for you....

http://b-dig.iie.org.mx/BibDig/P07-0673/da...T2007-27562.pdf

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk



Thanks Joe, I was being lazy.
If I was still at work I could have got it for free (ASME documentation) so I'm not sure it warrants $25.


On 10th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:

Interestingly it states that optimum efficiency of the turbine is when inlet flow is tangential to the blade tips and does not vary significantly in the range of -40 to +30 degrees. This is as I always understood the principles of impulse turbines. There may be some reaction in the wheel i.e. power derived from expansion through the wheel, but this is unlikely.


I would agree if it was a true impulse turbine, but the 90 degree turn surely has to make it a compound turbine.

But more so, the actual VNT bits (ignoring the fact they are variable) are shaped exactly like the inlet guide belt of a reaction turbine. So I would suggest a fair amount of expansion is occuring.

But none of this really answers the question about backpressure losses compared to a conventional wastegate.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Apparently most automative turbines have around 50% reaction according to Winterbone, so I will concede on that one.

I still think that all the flow has to go through the wheel so accurate sizing is essential if you want maximum power.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 10th Oct, 2011 Joe C said:
I think at that point the link is talking about constant flow, (only skim read it)


bit more bed time reading for you....

http://b-dig.iie.org.mx/BibDig/P07-0673/da...T2007-27562.pdf


That's another useful bit of info Joe.

Interestingly it states "The maximum adjustable flow capability of the turbine reaches 150%. The efficiency drop due to the introduction of variable nozzle is small"

I think that means that you can have a 50% bigger turbine without scarificing efficiency.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

For information, data from my simulation of a balls-out 998 5 port on 12 psi, 7.5k, Gt17

Compressor flow 0.137 kg/sec
Wastegate flow 0.049 kg/sec

Therefore turbine flow 0.088 kg/sec

So that 150% will just about cut it.

EDIT: Not sure that this tells us anything other than a VNT25 can be used in a GT17 application without a wastegate.

Edited by Paul S on 10th Oct, 2011.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


wez

1226 Posts
Member #: 9271
Post Whore

Stoke on Trent

just looking through ebay and it would appear that the gt1549 from the rover 25/45 diesels is already in the correct orientation to fit on a mini.
not exactly ground breaking info, just thought it might be useful for someone.

one day boost will be mine!

On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each...


jdisel

User Avatar

126 Posts
Member #: 9515
Advanced Member

ireland



On 10th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:
For information, data from my simulation of a balls-out 998 5 port on 12 psi, 7.5k, Gt17

Compressor flow 0.137 kg/sec
Wastegate flow 0.049 kg/sec

Therefore turbine flow 0.088 kg/sec

So that 150% will just about cut it.

EDIT: Not sure that this tells us anything other than a VNT25 can be used in a GT17 application without a wastegate.


Do you think the vnt17 would suit in my build, or would an external wastegate have to be used, about 100 bhp is my target, and at 10 - 12 psi.


iv found several ways that people control their vnt but im thinking using a megasquirt setup would give the best resuilt, in this link ( http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=80599 ) it shows how its done to control a wastegate turbo. But a tps is required to fill in the table, i assume the setup could be run on rpm alone but i think a tps would give better results. Just wondering how well this setup would run and also if i was to fit a TPS would i have to take trottle position into account when timing the engine when using map too .

Also any ideas on prices and places to get a megasquirt setup, just trying to figure out how much extra going the vnt route would cost over a normal wastegate turbo using megajolt and if its actually worth it. Do ye think megasquirt is a better choice wheither i go the vnt route or not, what exactly does it offer over megajolt.
Cheers for all the replies.

Edited by jdisel on 13th Oct, 2011.

A job worth doing is a job worth over doing


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

thats exactly what I'm working on now,

I fitted the FET tuesday ahd had it controlling a valve from a scooby, just sneed to bung it on the car and map the boost now.

I also want to try driving an RC servo tomorow.

I really like the MS, but for the MS2 you need to be a bit of an electronics dabbler, MS3 will do a lot with no mods.

I recomend DIY autotune for MS stuff,

as for what it can do over MJ... injection (but tbh thats a whole other topic on the 5 port), mappable boost, programable outputs, idle valve control, launch control,

but the best thing about MS is what you can log... TPS, MAP, Coolant temp, manifolt temp, AFR, RPM, and all the outputs from the ECU like Advance, injector PW, ilde valve position, ect.

you can log upto about an hour in my experience, heres some screen grabs of what the logs look like.











On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



jdisel

User Avatar

126 Posts
Member #: 9515
Advanced Member

ireland

MS3 is an expensive bit of kit but looks impressive, can the MS2 be easily modded with basic soldering skills to give the same result, Is it MS2 or MS3 you man used in the link i left in my previous post.

Are you using a boost actuator to control the vnt,
would using a vacume pump and the standard actuator with a high speed valve work too.

A job worth doing is a job worth over doing


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

in that link its actually an MS1 on a version 2.2 PCB, probably with the MS1 extra code programmed into the chip.

Yes I'm using a boost actuator, My current turbo came with it as std,

you could use a vacum pump and the std actuator and valve ( thats what they do on a lot or production deisils), but IMO it will be easier to swap the actuator rather than rig up a pump,


On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



jdisel

User Avatar

126 Posts
Member #: 9515
Advanced Member

ireland

Do you just download the MS1 extra code off the net for free or has it to be bought,
My thinking behind it is that the vacume pump would give more predictable results than using boost and it would not be affected by engine load or would it make any difference.

A job worth doing is a job worth over doing


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

yep, you can just download the extra code,

If you use a vacum pump I think you'd be able to control the boost at low boosts better, and also you would be able to keep the vanes open at cruise.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Also Jeans up coming rugedized MS is worth a look too, probably over kill though unless you are injecting.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



jdisel

User Avatar

126 Posts
Member #: 9515
Advanced Member

ireland

I think ill be adding a megasquirt setup to my long list of bits i need,

Let me know how well your vnt project goes joe.

A job worth doing is a job worth over doing

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > The best turbo for a 998?
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: