| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > The best turbo for a 998? | |||||||
![]() 126 Posts Member #: 9515 Advanced Member ireland |
9th Oct, 2011 at 07:44:44pm
Thanks for the links wil
A job worth doing is a job worth over doing |
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
9th Oct, 2011 at 08:07:15pm
On 9th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:
Never really thought much about VNTs before. Need to walk before running sort of thing. BUT what worries me is that without a wastegate, all engine exhaust flow has to pass though the turbine. Seeing as we usually only need a fraction of the gas to drive the turbine, is this not going to cause far higher back pressure than is healthy??? Apologies for thread jack. No, not from what I've seen from dismatling one. It looks like it's a case of the exhaust gas passing into the turbine vanes at the correct angle, or just being swung over the top of the turbine vanes so straight down the exhaust. They really boost at very low RPM on diesels, and I do mean very low. Air mass flow and temperatures are very different on a diesel but I really think VNT is the way forward. Only immediate problem I can see is the GT17**V diesel ones are oil cooled only, no water jacket. The GT17** petrol ones all seem to be water cooled. Cores aren't interchangable because of the way the VNT actuator mechanism is built into the exhaust side of the core. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
![]() 1137 Posts Member #: 1450 Post Whore Near Paris - France |
9th Oct, 2011 at 08:12:14pm
Diesel use vacuum actuation because they are fitted as standart with a vacuum pump in order to have brake assist.
Rusty by nature
On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:
They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!" |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
9th Oct, 2011 at 08:38:38pm
On 9th Oct, 2011 Rod S said:
It looks like it's a case of the exhaust gas passing into the turbine vanes at the correct angle, or just being swung over the top of the turbine vanes so straight down the exhaust. So are you saying that not all the exhaust gas has to pass through the wheel? i.e. not a closed shroud shaped to the wheel profile. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 126 Posts Member #: 9515 Advanced Member ireland |
9th Oct, 2011 at 09:45:14pm
I spent the day thinking of simple ways to get a vnt turbo to work in a 998 engine and i came up with a rather crude way of controlling the boost when using megesquirt.
Edited by jdisel on 10th Oct, 2011. A job worth doing is a job worth over doing |
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
10th Oct, 2011 at 08:35:19am
On 9th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:
So are you saying that not all the exhaust gas has to pass through the wheel? i.e. not a closed shroud shaped to the wheel profile. I haven't been able to get the stainless insert out of the large casting yet to exactly how it's profile matches the wheel but if you look at this picture from my other thread
I think it's a case of the exhaust gas either being directed to the centre of the wheel where the angle it hits the blades will be optimum and maximum kinetic and heat energy extracted or directed just at the tips of the blades where the angle will be all wrong, flow path mimimum and little energy extracted. How much clearance there is around the exit won't be clear until the sleeve is out so it may drop its power output in a very inefficient way (creating un-necissary backpressure) but they seem to have taken reasonable care with the design - for example all the guide vanes are fed from a snail shape within the main casting so they all get equal flow and they are all reasonable aerofoil shape. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
10th Oct, 2011 at 11:38:10am
theres somthing about vane angles relating to efficiency in here.
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
10th Oct, 2011 at 12:01:48pm
Nice find Joe,
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
10th Oct, 2011 at 12:16:41pm
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
10th Oct, 2011 at 12:18:26pm
On 10th Oct, 2011 Joe C said:
theres somthing about vane angles relating to efficiency in here. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=we...JLlp-zg&cad=rja Interestingly it states that optimum efficiency of the turbine is when inlet flow is tangential to the blade tips and does not vary significantly in the range of -40 to +30 degrees. This is as I always understood the principles of impulse turbines. There may be some reaction in the wheel i.e. power derived from expansion through the wheel, but this is unlikely. I have a couple of Winterbone books from 2000 and although principally about wave action methods for the design of manifolds, he does show that peak turbine efficiency is achieved when the blade tip speed is about 70% of the gas nozzle outlet velocity. Edited by Paul S on 10th Oct, 2011. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
10th Oct, 2011 at 12:27:37pm
I think at that point the link is talking about constant flow, (only skim read it)
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
10th Oct, 2011 at 12:31:04pm
Thanks Joe, I was being lazy. If I was still at work I could have got it for free (ASME documentation) so I'm not sure it warrants $25. On 10th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:
Interestingly it states that optimum efficiency of the turbine is when inlet flow is tangential to the blade tips and does not vary significantly in the range of -40 to +30 degrees. This is as I always understood the principles of impulse turbines. There may be some reaction in the wheel i.e. power derived from expansion through the wheel, but this is unlikely. I would agree if it was a true impulse turbine, but the 90 degree turn surely has to make it a compound turbine. But more so, the actual VNT bits (ignoring the fact they are variable) are shaped exactly like the inlet guide belt of a reaction turbine. So I would suggest a fair amount of expansion is occuring. But none of this really answers the question about backpressure losses compared to a conventional wastegate. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
10th Oct, 2011 at 12:46:23pm
Apparently most automative turbines have around 50% reaction according to Winterbone, so I will concede on that one.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
10th Oct, 2011 at 01:02:40pm
On 10th Oct, 2011 Joe C said:
I think at that point the link is talking about constant flow, (only skim read it) bit more bed time reading for you.... http://b-dig.iie.org.mx/BibDig/P07-0673/da...T2007-27562.pdf That's another useful bit of info Joe. Interestingly it states "The maximum adjustable flow capability of the turbine reaches 150%. The efficiency drop due to the introduction of variable nozzle is small" I think that means that you can have a 50% bigger turbine without scarificing efficiency. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
10th Oct, 2011 at 01:44:53pm
For information, data from my simulation of a balls-out 998 5 port on 12 psi, 7.5k, Gt17
Edited by Paul S on 10th Oct, 2011. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
1226 Posts Member #: 9271 Post Whore Stoke on Trent |
12th Oct, 2011 at 05:12:11pm
just looking through ebay and it would appear that the gt1549 from the rover 25/45 diesels is already in the correct orientation to fit on a mini.
one day boost will be mine!
On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each... |
||||||
![]() 126 Posts Member #: 9515 Advanced Member ireland |
13th Oct, 2011 at 09:21:26pm
On 10th Oct, 2011 Paul S said:
For information, data from my simulation of a balls-out 998 5 port on 12 psi, 7.5k, Gt17 Compressor flow 0.137 kg/sec Wastegate flow 0.049 kg/sec Therefore turbine flow 0.088 kg/sec So that 150% will just about cut it. EDIT: Not sure that this tells us anything other than a VNT25 can be used in a GT17 application without a wastegate. Do you think the vnt17 would suit in my build, or would an external wastegate have to be used, about 100 bhp is my target, and at 10 - 12 psi. iv found several ways that people control their vnt but im thinking using a megasquirt setup would give the best resuilt, in this link ( http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=80599 ) it shows how its done to control a wastegate turbo. But a tps is required to fill in the table, i assume the setup could be run on rpm alone but i think a tps would give better results. Just wondering how well this setup would run and also if i was to fit a TPS would i have to take trottle position into account when timing the engine when using map too . Also any ideas on prices and places to get a megasquirt setup, just trying to figure out how much extra going the vnt route would cost over a normal wastegate turbo using megajolt and if its actually worth it. Do ye think megasquirt is a better choice wheither i go the vnt route or not, what exactly does it offer over megajolt. Cheers for all the replies. Edited by jdisel on 13th Oct, 2011. A job worth doing is a job worth over doing |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
13th Oct, 2011 at 09:51:49pm
thats exactly what I'm working on now,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 126 Posts Member #: 9515 Advanced Member ireland |
13th Oct, 2011 at 11:06:53pm
MS3 is an expensive bit of kit but looks impressive, can the MS2 be easily modded with basic soldering skills to give the same result, Is it MS2 or MS3 you man used in the link i left in my previous post.
A job worth doing is a job worth over doing |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
13th Oct, 2011 at 11:14:42pm
in that link its actually an MS1 on a version 2.2 PCB, probably with the MS1 extra code programmed into the chip.
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 126 Posts Member #: 9515 Advanced Member ireland |
13th Oct, 2011 at 11:32:14pm
Do you just download the MS1 extra code off the net for free or has it to be bought,
A job worth doing is a job worth over doing |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
13th Oct, 2011 at 11:37:16pm
yep, you can just download the extra code,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
14th Oct, 2011 at 11:42:49am
Also Jeans up coming rugedized MS is worth a look too, probably over kill though unless you are injecting.
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 126 Posts Member #: 9515 Advanced Member ireland |
15th Oct, 2011 at 08:59:56pm
I think ill be adding a megasquirt setup to my long list of bits i need,
A job worth doing is a job worth over doing |
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > The best turbo for a 998? | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |



