Page:
Home > For Sale > SA 1100 Cranks.

Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 25th Sep, 2009 01smartc said:
Ok fair play, I am planning to run a turbo and about 11,000 RPM though so want it to be strong! lol


You will need a 16v head

I can help you with that*happy*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Ive got a 16v head, thats the race engine i'm running at the miniute, that goes to 9000RPM quite easily on a std stroke.

I want to bring the cc below 1000cc so I can turbo it and still remain in the up to 1400cc class (capacity is X 1.4 when forced induction is used)

So in actual fact I think 11000rpm isnt that unrealistic.


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

When you realize that you wont be able to use one of these cranks can i buy one off you 01smartc?

Problem 1. is the bore, Firstly to get it down to 67.3
Problem 2. is the bore once more. I don`t think the valves will clear the bore of the cylinder walls.
Problem 3. is the deck height, you will need to get longer rods. Or cause problems with the conversion kit you will most probably get from John K. Also do you trust an 8MM deck height holding your head on to the top of your engine.

Problem 4. is caused by the use of longer custom rods and the weight they add to the rotating assembly?
Problem 5. is turbo matching. Youll have to use something like a gt28 or a gt28rs. You wont see a useable boost level till 6 maybe 6 and a half grand.

All this for 230 BHP and 115 LBS/FT of torque?

Edited by Sam on 26th Sep, 2009.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland

Problam 6: where are you going to get valve springs to hold the valves of a k16v head closed at those RPM.
Problam 7 How do you propose to get around Piston Gs at that RPM.
Problam 8 how will you keep main bearings in the egine with the crank flex at that speed.

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I like your thinking, turbo choice will be tricky. What sort of power do you want?

It's a bit of a funny one really, say you want 180bhp at 11000rpm the a you won't need really high boost to achieve this, so a GT17 might work. Problem is you will need a 'sporty' can to get to 11000rpm, which means that low down power will be massively compromised.

My mate with a 875 turbo climax in a Clan really struggles to get it off the line, and he has little traction problems, in a mini it might be difficult. and you will need seriously low gearing to ensure you don't bog down on some tighter corners.

The engine you propose may be suitable for race circuits where you never drop below 5000rpm, but for hillclimbing I'm not sure it'll work.

With our 998 turbo hillclimber we have ended upi with a compromise between power and drivability. I think with a bit more boost we could be making maybe 180bhp. But we plan to only run high boost in 3rd and 4th as we are pretty much traction limited in 1st and 2nd with over 14ftlbs of torque.

We have considered the short stroke route, but the available rpm it gives you is of no advantage with a turbo, and torque is king on the hills.

see my sig, our car works!!!

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire


All that development and that's all the torque it makes *hehe!*

On 27th Sep, 2009 wil_h said:
with over 14ftlbs of torque.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


lockfast

559 Posts
Member #: 2775
Post Whore

Aberdeen

Couldnt pull the skin off a rice puddin with that! Are you sure?


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

missed a 0. now stop being so pedantic!!

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

I see what your saying. My current engine is making 176BHP and 134 ftlbs.

So I want more than this really. My championship (not sure about yours) is mostly sprints rather than hills so essentially circuit racing, but just 1 lap.

I think the head will be ok at that rpm, it goes much higher than that on the bike


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire


So that's 0.14Ftlbs?? That's even worse....

On 27th Sep, 2009 wil_h said:
missed a 0. now stop being so pedantic!!

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland




On 27th Sep, 2009 01smartc said:
.

I think the head will be ok at that rpm, it goes much higher than that on the bike



Ehhh No; no it does not Rev limit of a K1100 is 8,900rpm:
http://www.technical-specification.com/bmw...al-system-specs
http://www.k11og.org/reference/reviews/Mot...SRoadTest.shtml

Also could you give me a roung spec of the A series engine you have that is producing 174hp is it turbo ?

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


johnK

1425 Posts
Member #: 690
Post Whore

Norfolk

a little off topic but as its part of the conversation, calculated valve bounce with K1100 valves/valve springs/ top caps/collets is 9500rpm. With the K1200 RS and its lower mass valves/top caps its 10800rpm.

JK

If Carling made Mini engines
it would probably be like this one!


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

Thats quite interesting really. Do you think it will just be a problem with valve float or will it start murdering cams?

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

Get a set of rods and a crank made up then. 58.5mm crank and 73.5mm bore. 10 grand and a gt2056 turbo and about. 180 bananas and 100 curlywurlys

Edited by Sam on 27th Sep, 2009.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Cheers john, so 10,000 rpm is deffo possible with my head.

Anyway is this a good target rpm for turbo? by the sound of it probs not.

Im not that clued up on turbos tbh.

Lets say im aiming for 200bhp 150ftlbs


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

Its not going to happen.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

helpful


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York


On 27th Sep, 2009 Sam said:
Get a set of rods and a crank made up then. 58.5mm crank and 73.5mm bore. 10 grand and a gt2056 turbo and about. 180 bananas and 100 curlywurlys


I think you're a little confused Sam. If you want 180 bhp out of a 998 then you need a certain volume of air per min, the rpm of the engine is irrelavent.

if you want 180 bhp at 7000rpm, then you'll need, say, 20psi, if you want it at 11000rpm, then you'll need a lot less psi. As you need less psi and not more, it's likely that a suitable turbo can be found, in fact I'd guess that the GT17 will be suitable.

Of course this lower psi will mean less torque. And withh the cam you need for 11000rpm you will still most likely have the same power band size.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

I have no doubt it would be great technical excercise to have a 1000cc big bore 16v turbo screamer however I think you may be disappointed with the finished product. I can't help but think there are more efficient ways to get the output you want/need and still remain within the reg you want. You only have to look at Wil and Ben's TT with its well proven performance.

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


lockfast

559 Posts
Member #: 2775
Post Whore

Aberdeen

In my opinion (and it is just an opinion) worry a little less about the bhp figure and concentrate on the torque figure. BHP is just for bragging about down the pub but torque is what you actualy need/feel when out on the road.


1430 Mk1

10 Posts
Member #: 7145
Member

One well known local hillclimber used an Arden 8 port with a 51mm crank to get 849cc and that would turn 13K, I gather. A short stroke 3 bearing engine is fine as far as balance and stiffness are concerned. Stupidly high revs are a thing of the past, the original minisprint hit 12K in an engine with every (bodge) mod thrown at it. Cue running very high octane, mega sprint cams and serious compression ratios. Oh, mateys 13k 850 did about 4mpg....

The torque comments are totally valid, it would be better to use low revs, high boost and long stroke....gear it properly.

Another thing limiting you would be the flywheel/clutch. It would need to be a very special piece of kit and at that speed, may give a bit of a lazy response....if you had one big enough not to explode.

Reading back through the threads, there are a fair amount of cynical pricks on here, but there are also a lot of bullshitters.

Read your Vizard and build something really silly. My thought is that you won't get the fuel to make it happen. Unless you run avgas.


GaryOS

User Avatar

1424 Posts
Member #: 2810
Formally spanner181187

Dublin, Ireland

On 28th Sep, 2009 1430 Mk1 said:

Reading back through the threads, there are a fair amount of cynical pricks on here, but there are also a lot of bullshitters.


Cynical, maybe. Bullshitter, no. The lack of bullshit is the reason this forum is so popular

On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:

I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse *happy*


On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland


BAC

On 28th Sep, 2009 1430 Mk1 said:

Reading back through the threads, there are a fair amount of cynical pricks on here, but there are also a lot of bullshitters.

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Here's a bit of fuel for the fire, my K100 980cc build at 20 psi boost *surprised*

Just 8000rpm to get to 200hp.

EDIT: added units to calcs


Attachments:

Edited by Paul S on 28th Sep, 2009.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."

Home > For Sale > SA 1100 Cranks.
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: