Page:
Home > Technical Chat > N/A Vs Turbo??

Clarks.2006

8 Posts
Member #: 1222
Junior Member

19th Aug, 2006 at 08:24:37pm

Im wondering if a n/a turbo engine would be faster than just a 1275 engine?? thanks clarks.2006

Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

19th Aug, 2006 at 08:30:50pm

N/A is an abreiviation for normally aspirated, which means non turbo'd.

oh, hang on I think I see what you mean now, will a metro turbo engine with no turbo on it be faster than a std metro engine.

erm, the actual engine is basicly the same, ie same cc, same valve sizes, same camshaft, same compression ratio?

so assuming they are both fitted with the same manifolds, carb& ignition. the power output should be near as damit the same.

Edited by Joe C on 19th Aug, 2006.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Dangerous

User Avatar

2521 Posts
Member #: 417
Post Whore

Swindon

19th Aug, 2006 at 08:31:28pm

A n/a turbo engine would be less powerful due to lower compression,smaller valves,and low performance cam


Metro turbo weekend driver,Mini turbo in the making again!


Home > Technical Chat > N/A Vs Turbo??
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: