Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > FAQ / Knowledge > Maximum Compression Ratio

Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

i thought mine was strange but yours is even stranger. i've been told of jap engines runnig between 8.5 and 9:1 cr and running 20psi, dont know how.

my original head had the beaks removed, ported and 33mm valves, replacement head is standard MG metro.
is it a beak thing?
is it the porting?


Jay#2

User Avatar

2500 Posts
Member #: 648
Post Whore

Northern Ireland (ex AUS)

Jap engines will have alloy heads with nicer shaped chambers for a start.

On 7th Nov, 2008 Nic said:
naeJ
m
!!!!!!sdrawkcab si gnihtyreve ?droabyekym ot deneppah sah tahw ayhwdd


Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

they also have different cams etc


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10979 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Bud - How about a visual comparison of the two chambers (ie a picture of both) so we can compare any difference there.
I see you've already noted that the valves and ports are similar...

I do have one question though - I recall this head is from someone who has on many occasions 'accidentally' marked heads up with the wrong chamber volume? Any chance this has happened here - ie are you 100% sure it is what it says?

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Turbo Shed

1303 Posts
Member #: 30
Post Whore

Epsom, Surrey

mine is the same old engine but with a change of head. Bud666 sounds like hes in the same boat.

is it all down to chamber shape?
or the different valve sizes?
or the porting?

i will take photos of both heads tonight

Edited by Turbo Shed on 13th Sep, 2007.


RogerM

User Avatar

2514 Posts
Member #: 1217
I like nice quiet girly Minis

Cheltenham, Gloucestershire




On 13th of Sep, 2007 at 04:35pm Turbo Shed said:
i thought mine was strange but yours is even stranger. i've been told of jap engines runnig between 8.5 and 9:1 cr and running 20psi, dont know how.

my original head had the beaks removed, ported and 33mm valves, replacement head is standard MG metro.
is it a beak thing?
is it the porting?




Basically it's down to the pent roof chambers being more det resistant, ali heads offering better heat rejection from the combustion chambers, dynamic compression (i.e. cam choice) and most likely having proper full feedback management.

I ran upto a bar at 10:1 on my 4AGE, dropped it back a little mainly because I wanted to change to a turbo better suited to the car and it's efficient range took me down to about 12psi (spooled up super quick though .... important in a 475kg rwd weapon!!)

Every day is a school day ...........

How fast and how expensive ...... the same question...

On 27th of Sep, 2007 at 12:45pm Jimster said:

why do you you think I got a girlfriend with small hands?


stevieturbo

3569 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland



On 13th of Sep, 2007 at 04:35pm Turbo Shed said:
i thought mine was strange but yours is even stranger. i've been told of jap engines runnig between 8.5 and 9:1 cr and running 20psi, dont know how.



Really that is nothing.

Ive run in excess of 30psi on about 8.5:1 on Subaru engines...which maybe isnt anything special.

But I was chatting to a friend recently, and he runs 30+ psi, on 10.0:1 CR, on pump fuel !!!!!!!!!!
Now I was totally stunned by this, but I fully trust what he was telling me.

On my LS1, I was running as much as 20psi ( albeit at 7000rpm ) on 8.7:1, which was a very very conservative CR.
Im rebuilding and increasing that to 9.4:1, as I played safe during my first build.

I know of other LS1 users using similar boost, with 10.0:1 CR too !!!

I will admit, I struggle to comprehend how they get away with it.

It really does seem that low CR's are getting a bit old tech these days, and higher CR's are the way forward. Although obviously different engine designs will tolerate different CR's/boost

Edited by stevieturbo on 13th Sep, 2007.

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4823 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

dave, they're as near as dammit the same heads, same chamber shape etc. the only difference really is that mine had the inlet ports took out a lot more.

my original one was supposed to be 29cc when i bought it, didn't actually check it till xmas (2 years later, lol) and it came out at 26.6cc. and there was me thinking i was running around 8:1 all that time. wil measured his at 27cc so i'd trust his measurements.

here's a grotty pic of my old head a while ago.


and what happened to it :(


don't have any pics of the new one unless wil does?

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


Jordan

User Avatar

1913 Posts
Member #: 1392
Pointless Post Whore

Liverpool, North west

Are we talking about reliabilty of head gaskets running boost on high c/r?

Remember Japs run stupid octane fuels, surely this must help?

Back once again like a renegade master


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4823 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

i've never blown a head gasket...

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


Jordan

User Avatar

1913 Posts
Member #: 1392
Pointless Post Whore

Liverpool, North west

Oh, just pump the boost up then, kick the pedal and hold your goodies!!!

Back once again like a renegade master


miniminor63

User Avatar

1849 Posts
Member #: 672
The oversills police

Oslo, Norway

ehh? thats something to do if you want a hole in a piston...


Jordan

User Avatar

1913 Posts
Member #: 1392
Pointless Post Whore

Liverpool, North west

But think how good itd be for that 2 secs of boost. LOL
Im only messing.

Back once again like a renegade master


stevieturbo

3569 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland




On 13th of Sep, 2007 at 11:02pm minimadj said:
Are we talking about reliabilty of head gaskets running boost on high c/r?

Remember Japs run stupid octane fuels, surely this must help?


Not all Japs run it....their pump fuel is allegedly slightly higher than UK fuel, but that doesnt mean every japanese engine around the world use higher octane fuel than we get here...

The 30psi 10.0:1 CR engine I referred to, is a British engine !!!!!! albeit a 16v head.
Im still baffled by this !

But there is a wide school of people, who think low timing, and high CR is the better route to go on a lot of engines, as opposed to the old school approach, of low CR, and high boost.

I guess its just finding that fine balance of the two.....then throw in camshafts/overlap to see how it affects things :S

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


Bat

User Avatar

4559 Posts
Member #: 786
Post Whore

Bermingum

Hi,
I too think that higher CR is a better way to go, it has to be more efficient which can only mean more power. Whichever way you go, high or low CR, accurate fuelling, timing and possibly boost control are essential.
Cheers,
Gavin :)

VEMs Authorised Installer / Re-seller. K head kits now available!

WB/EGT gauges. Click here for customers write-up

Visit www.doyouneedabrain.co.uk

My Mini build diary


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Bah! Iv'e just searched the interweb for the last hour or so looking for this sort of info an not turned up anything usefull,

WHY did I not search TM first!!

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

It looks a bit out of date now though.

Enough people running 8.5:1 at 20 psi now.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Ah, but on what octane, not 95 that the graph was done for.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

thread digging!
clearly im looking at CR and effects none of the link seam to work for me probaly to old lol any way..

so we know that the god old basic (static) CR ie spewed volume vs non sweped forgetting about losses and the fact of open valves ect has some efect on what is the actule ratio/cylender pressure but what really makes the difrence is valve timeing, stroke length, bore size, rod length, of cause boost and basic cr to get the most realistic CR..

so what am in trying to explain/ask? well basicly what should we consider to be the max dynamic cr for a motor? one thing to note is i will be running E85 fuel (85% ethanol) i have read that some people are running e85 up to 20:1 CR!? i dont know how true that is im just seeing what/if people have know to work or rather NOT WORK lol

my planed engine comes out as
bore size 2.6025
stroke size 3.2960
rod length 5.75
sweped vs non cr 9.5
intake closes abdc 69
boost 22psi

comes out at

Static compression ratio of 9.5:1.
Effective stroke is 2.45 inches.
Your dynamic compression ratio is 7.30:1 .
Your dynamic cranking pressure is 141.08 PSI.
Your effective boost compression ratio, reflecting static c.r., cam timing and boost of 22 PSI is 18.23 :1 true? CR on max boost

so considering that the effective cr is 7.3 with the late intake closing time should allow me to run 22psi with out to much trouble?

the intake closing time has a big affect on the cr from what ive seen looking around the www

what are your thoughts on this guys? agree about the cam late cam timeing reduced the cr there for alowing more boost? also max real cr? 15:1 18:1 ?

god bad otherwise let me have it


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

It has everything to do with temperature at the point of combustion.

Work that out and you are sorted.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9401 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

8.5:1 and over 30psi and with air charge temps of over 60deg's without issues

Team www.sheepspeed.com Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? directbackup.net one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1750 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium




On 20th Nov, 2006 Paul S said:
Every week there is a question about compresion ratio.

So I've tried to pull together the collective expertise and experience of the forum on this into a single chart.

The chart shows the maximum compression ratio for a given boost. The three curves relate to the inlet closing point of the chosen cam. For example an SW5 has an inlet closing at 48 Deg ABDC and the MG Metro, 56 Deg ABDC so a bit of interpolation is required.

Less than 20 degree inlet closing angle has little effect on the dynamic compression ratio.

This assumes an efficient intercooler.

And 95 RON Unleaded.

http://www.jaservices.co.uk/photos/Max%20Comp%20Ratio.JPG


cant open chart. will be one to follow though

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

i see so ill look at what temperature and pressure E85 will detonate at

try to work out a estimate on charge temps and ic efficiency

jim what fuel and cam are you using with that 8.5 and 30 psi


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

stumbled apron this an interesting and confusing read ill have to read it again tomorrow hopefully it will make more sense!
http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/172...2/676953430.pdf

i spoke with the engine shop today about my build and regarding the E85 fuel
he said its a grate fuel if you get it from a proper souse ie not the local servo as the quality fluctuates far to much to tune the car properly

Home > FAQ / Knowledge > Maximum Compression Ratio
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: