Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > suck through to blow through

mini23

194 Posts
Member #: 1296
Advanced Member

Milford Haven Pembrokeshire

Following up on a previous topic, i've decided experiment by converting my suck through supercharger to a blow through system using 2 chargers in series.

Some questions for you turbo users.

I looked through some of the well known suppliers sites for a hif44 carb and although they list the carb and they list turbo service kits they don't advertise a specific turbo hif44, is the carb completly different?

Do i require a plenum and if so what is its purpose?

Where is the best place to purchase the pipework?
For the early stage of this experiment I shall not be installing an intercooler as the chargers take time to heat up and they never reach turbo air temps.


blown_imp

User Avatar

223 Posts
Member #: 598
Senior Member

Gaol

superchargers will heat the air more than a turbo due to the poor adiabatic efficiency.

how do you mean two chargers in series? what is the aim of having the two chargers in series?

Im supercharging my hillman imp and im using an intercooler off of an audi RS2!!! monster monster *wink*

J

On 5th of Sep, 2006 at 05:47pm mini13 said:

I reckon if his brains were gunpowder he couldn't blow his own hat off...


mini23

194 Posts
Member #: 1296
Advanced Member

Milford Haven Pembrokeshire

My thinking behind the 2 chargers is that each charger is more efficient at lower pressures, so 1 charger will flow a higher volume of air at 6psi than it will at 12psi and efficiency really drops off beyond 12.
Therefore (and as I already own 2) if I front mount the chargers and fit a throttle body to the front of the first one and connect its discharge to the suction of the second then I could produce a higher charge pressure by also creating a higher flow.

As I said its only an expirement and since writting the thread the information I could find on the hif44 suggests a fairly straight forward conversion using a turbo service kit.


blown_imp

User Avatar

223 Posts
Member #: 598
Senior Member

Gaol

I think that the internal passages are different on the HIF44, the float is different as it is stronger to withstand collapsing. Im sure you have thought about the fuel pump , return lines, and pressure regulator.

The superchargers would have to be very carefully setup, the first spinning significantly faster than the second otherwise they will just move the air without any boost.

This kind of setup is much easier if a turbocharger is used as it will just flow enought air to create pressure up to a set limit.

What i suggest is very careful porting of a single supercharger, this post contains some interesting information -

http://turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.php?p=vt&tid=128332

A supercharger is a stragne device as it works on atmospheric pressure to fill the gaps produced as the rotors spin round. If the inlet and outlet are ported then the ability of the natural air pressure to fill the gaps is maximised, porting will see about a 2psi rise in boost for zero increase in speed.

J

Edited by blown_imp on 26th Jan, 2007.

On 5th of Sep, 2006 at 05:47pm mini13 said:

I reckon if his brains were gunpowder he couldn't blow his own hat off...


mini23

194 Posts
Member #: 1296
Advanced Member

Milford Haven Pembrokeshire

Fuel pump needs to be capable of supplying fuel at a pressure greater than max boost!
Not sure about the pressure regulator, my understanding is that the float chamber is pressurised by a take off from the charge air pressure.
For now both chargers can spin on the same size pulleys, maybe the first stage pressure increase will be less that the second stage but I dont think that will matter to much.


blown_imp

User Avatar

223 Posts
Member #: 598
Senior Member

Gaol

Unfortunatly that wont work mini23, the fuel pressure regulator is a must as it will provide 3psi to the carb under all conditions, as boost is introuduced it will add the 3psi to the boost. So at 5psi boost the fuel pressure will be at 8psi and so on.

having both superchargers working at the same RPM will not work either, as they move a fixed volume per revolution, the second chager will do no work. The first charger will have to spin faster than the second to provide more air than the second one can move. This will create an increase in pressure in the intemediate section between blowers that the second blower can work with.

J

On 5th of Sep, 2006 at 05:47pm mini13 said:

I reckon if his brains were gunpowder he couldn't blow his own hat off...


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland




On 26th of Jan, 2007 at 12:27pm blown_imp said:

having both superchargers working at the same RPM will not work either, as they move a fixed volume per revolution, the second chager will do no work. The first charger will have to spin faster than the second to provide more air than the second one can move. This will create an increase in pressure in the intemediate section between blowers that the second blower can work with.

J


you could have both chargers working in paralell?

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


mini23

194 Posts
Member #: 1296
Advanced Member

Milford Haven Pembrokeshire

Thanks for the information on the fuel pressure regulator, maybe you could suggest a good product/source?

As for the second supercharger doing no work that would only be the case if the final discharge were open to atmosphere and not restricted.
Thats also the case with one charger!
As said this is only an experiment and what its based on is the chargers capability to shift larger volumes of air at a lower discharge pressure.
My prediction is that the second charger will have a greater load imposed on it than the first.

As for running them in paralell, that would be a simple conversion for this setup and is something that may be tried if the series setup fails to work.
If this proves to be the case then it would probably be easier to fit a larger single charger!


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 27th of Jan, 2007 at 07:49am mini23 said:

As for the second supercharger doing no work that would only be the case if the final discharge were open to atmosphere and not restricted.
Thats also the case with one charger!
As said this is only an experiment and what its based on is the chargers capability to shift larger volumes of air at a lower discharge pressure.
My prediction is that the second charger will have a greater load imposed on it than the first.


I'm with blown imp on this one. If both blowers are running at the same speed, the first one will not do anything.

The first one needs to run faster.

You only cause boost when you are trying to force a certain of volume of air into a smaller space. As both blowers are the same capacity, then there will be no compression between them.

Speed the first one up and it will be moving a larger volume of air than the second one and the air will be compressed.

With my planned turbo/supercharger setup, the turbo is pushing the air equivalent to a 3 litre engine, the blower 2 litre and the engine is one litre, hence you get successive compression.

Edited by Paul S on 27th Jan, 2007.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


danboy

715 Posts
Member #: 1381
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire



On 27th of Jan, 2007 at 07:49am mini23 said:

As for the second supercharger doing no work that would only be the case if the final discharge were open to atmosphere and not restricted.
Thats also the case with one charger!
As said this is only an experiment and what its based on is the chargers capability to shift larger volumes of air at a lower discharge pressure.
My prediction is that the second charger will have a greater load imposed on it than the first.

As for running them in paralell, that would be a simple conversion for this setup and is something that may be tried if the series setup fails to work.
If this proves to be the case then it would probably be easier to fit a larger single charger!


Sorry, it won't work. I have to agree with BlownImp on this one.
I will try to explain why. Assuming you are to use 2 Eaton m45 blowers. These are fixed displacement units ie thay displace a fixed volume per revolution say for arguments sake .75 ltr. Assuming in this case the blower compresses the volume to .5ltr with a corresponding pressure increase of say 5psi. If you then feed this 0.5 ltr into the next blower which is looking to displace 0.75 ltr but can only recieve 0.5 ltr from the first blower you will see the problem. If there were no losses at all the second blower cannot compress this to a higer pressure than it was when it entered the blower as it would need 0.75ltr of the higher pressure output from the first blower.
This is the reson you would have to spin the first blower at a greater speed than the second, or fit a larger first blower say an m62.
The best set upfor a compound/ twin charged set up by far is turbo-blower-carb-engine. This has many advantages over either a single turbo or a single blower and is what I am doing on my project.
Regards
Dave

Edited by danboy on 27th Jan, 2007.


mini23

194 Posts
Member #: 1296
Advanced Member

Milford Haven Pembrokeshire

Yes, ok, good reply, that all makes sence.
So I probably need the first to run around its full rated speed and the second at maybe half the speed.


danboy

715 Posts
Member #: 1381
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

Mini 23
You could do that with two superchargers but it would be really inefficent. I would urge you to research the use of a turbo blowing into the blower, the advantages are far greater than any other method of forced induction. The only downside is packaging the set up into a Mini but than again so will two blowers.
Regards
Dave

Edited by danboy on 27th Jan, 2007.


mini23

194 Posts
Member #: 1296
Advanced Member

Milford Haven Pembrokeshire

I may end up going down that route!
However as a little expirement and as the car is not a road car and will see no use until may at the earliest and I have the 2 chargers i'll start with them.
If I have to purchase a hif44 some pipe a fuel regulator and pump and an intercooler then its not money wasted as I would need all of them for a turbo/charger combanation.


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland

or run boht chargers in paralell...

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 27th of Jan, 2007 at 05:35pm evolotion said:
or run boht chargers in paralell...


The blowers are very inefficient compared to a modern Garrett GT type turbocharger.

Furthermore, they are most efficient at a 1.4 pressure ratio, about 6psig boost!

Two blowers in parallel would create a lot of boost and a hell of a lot of heat.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


danboy

715 Posts
Member #: 1381
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire

Axel, do you want to edit that to NOT a lot of boost and........
Mini 23 How would you drive the Two blowers? Where would you mount them?
What pulley arrangement would you have? Would you use an intercooler?
Not trying to be negative about your project just curious
Regards
Dave

Edited by danboy on 27th Jan, 2007.


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland

i wouldnt run 2 blowers either, just suggesting how it may be done, 2 blowers would effectively meen they are each running into an engine of 1/2 the cc's therefore a higher pressure ratio for less RPM.

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 27th of Jan, 2007 at 07:24pm danboy said:
Axel, do you want to edit that to NOT a lot of boost and........


No. It could create a lot of boost, depending on what speed you run the blowers at, but it would be very hot air due to the blowers inefficiency compared to using a turbo.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


mini23

194 Posts
Member #: 1296
Advanced Member

Milford Haven Pembrokeshire


On 27th of Jan, 2007 at 07:24pm danboy said:
Axel, do you want to edit that to NOT a lot of boost and........
Mini 23 How would you drive the Two blowers? Where would you mount them?
What pulley arrangement would you have? Would you use an intercooler?
Not trying to be negative about your project just curious
Regards
Dave


At the moment the car has a fibreglass front, so removable in a couple of minutes.

For my test I would remove the alternator and possibly relocate the radiator (electric fan prehaps)
The chargers would then be mounted on a plate, side by side and tight together. From the underside of the plate I will fit the discharge pipe, which will consist of a pipe cut along its length until it clears the mounting plate itself, where it will return to fully round. This should enable the chargers to be mounted tight to the block.
The discharge from the first charger will be piped directly into the suction of the second.
I already have the pulley system in place driving the one charger so I would only need to manufacture a pulley for the second stage charger (twice the size as discussed).
The chargers would be belt driven like twin cams.

Initally I would test without an intercooler, and if the desired boost could be achieved (around 18psi) then an intercooler would be fitted to keep the charger air temperature down.

Finally if everything works then it would probably be necessary to fit a clubman front.

I still have my old 1275gt shell and log book, although the shell will never make it back on the road as its to far gone.

Edited by mini23 on 28th Jan, 2007.

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > suck through to blow through
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: