Page:
Home > General Chat > turbo dizzy

n.g.l.

User Avatar

370 Posts
Member #: 181
Senior Member

Chard, Somerset

2nd Jun, 2004 at 01:26:14pm

which is the better of the two? Mk 1 with separate ign. module or Mk2 with ign. module mounted on the dizzy?

iain
Site Admin

User Avatar

8506 Posts
Member #: 16
Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do!

Near Lincoln

2nd Jun, 2004 at 01:28:20pm

both the same *smiley*

tests have been done and results posted sometime in the past and found to be the same.

Pretty sure it was turbodave that did it although i cant be sure.


n.g.l.

User Avatar

370 Posts
Member #: 181
Senior Member

Chard, Somerset

2nd Jun, 2004 at 01:45:57pm

i'm sure i read somewhere the Mk 1 had a better advance curve?

AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

2nd Jun, 2004 at 01:54:00pm

better more like differnt.... it is only a benfit if it helps your engine!!!

alex

AlexF

iain
Site Admin

User Avatar

8506 Posts
Member #: 16
Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do!

Near Lincoln

2nd Jun, 2004 at 02:04:52pm

Yeah you will of read it somewhere but the tests proved otherwise!

We all thought the same too! *smiley*

TurboHarry

User Avatar

263 Posts
Member #: 115
Senior Member

Austria, near Vienna

2nd Jun, 2004 at 06:34:01pm

I tested both about 2 years ago. The advance curves are exactly the same!!

Bimmer Twinky headed and turboed A-Series:
http://www.minifreunde.at/harry/projects.htm

Home > General Chat > turbo dizzy
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: