Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Technical Chat > VE of an A Series

AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

Has anyone measured / worked it out?

If not what do you guys assume?

AlexF


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I always assume 82%.

It seems to check out reasonably consistantly when we get reliable dyno results.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

that low :oO

AlexF


MikeRace

User Avatar

6549 Posts
Member #: 1149
#1 Basshunter Fan

Force Racing ICT Dept Manager Miglia Turbo Am frum Yokshyer tha noes!

VE?

1/4 Mile 14.3secs 96Mph Terminal 10psi of boost.


Fibreglass Parts? - http://www.tdkracing.co.uk/
Split Rims? - http://www.force-racing.co.uk/


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

Volumetric Efficiency


from WPidia

Volumetric efficiency in internal combustion engine design refers to the efficiency with which the engine can move the charge into and out of the cylinders. More correctly, volumetric efficiency is a ratio (or percentage) of what volume of fuel and air actually enters the cylinder during induction to the actual capacity of the cylinder under static conditions. Therefore, those engines that can create higher induction manifold pressures - above ambient - will have efficiencies greater than 100%. Volumetric efficiencies can be improved in a number of ways, but most notably the size of the valve openings compared to the volume of the cylinder and streamlining the ports. Engines with higher volumetric efficiency will generally be able to run at higher RPM, and thus power, settings as they will lose less power to moving air in and out of the engine.

There are several standard ways to improve volumetric efficiency. A common approach for manufacturers is to use a larger number of valves, see multi-valve, which cover a greater area of the cylinder head. Carefully streamlining the ports increases flow capability. This is referred to as Porting and is done with the aid of an air flow bench for testing. Today, automobile engines typically have four valves per cylinder for this reason. Many high performance cars in the 1970s used carefully arranged air intakes and "tuned" exhaust systems to "push" air into and out of the cylinders through the intrinsic resonance of the system. Two-stroke engines take this concept even further with expansion chambers that returns the escaping air-fuel mixture back to the cylinder. A more modern technique, variable valve timing, attempts to address changes in volumetric efficiency with changes in RPM of the engine -- at higher RPM the engine needs the valves open for a greater percentage of the cycle time to move the charge in and out of the engine.

More "radical" solutions include the sleeve valve design, in which the valves are replaced outright with a rotating sleeve around the piston, or alternately a rotating sleeve under the cylinder head. In this system the ports can be as large as necessary, up to that of the entire cylinder wall. However there is a practical upper limit due to the strength of the sleeve, at larger sizes the pressure inside the cylinder can "pop" the sleeve if the port is too large.

AlexF


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10979 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

When looking at compressor maps - I also use 82%, but review 80-84% to check if this takes anything to the edge. It is all pretty much pie in the sky anyways - as the valve sizes, CR, cam timing, etc are variables. It's deffo not over 84% though LOL

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

Reason for asking was exactly as TD says.... looking at Compressor Maps...

Not alot of matches for 200 bhp plus with hitting the surge line... but people are managing it

Either I'm missing something or its a case of theory vs reality not being equal!

Alex

AlexF


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Calculation of the air flow is down to the engine capacity and revs, plus three efficiencies: VE, compressor and intercooler.

The most indeterminate variable that affects air flow is the Intercooler efficiency.

Agree with TD but VE can be reasonably well approximated.

The compressor efficiency can be read off the map.

But we have to guess the intercooler efficiency. Plus use an ambient air temp to calculate a temperature drop and thus air flow.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6743 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus



running 9.5 psi and 150 bhp squirrel software,stepping up ve till i get to my bhp/psi level. crude software ,but interesting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Engine RPM: 1000 1500 2250 3000 4800 6600 6750 6900
Vol Efficency: 88 89 89 89 93 96 92 87
Intake Temp: 64 65 73 80 92 104 104 104
Expected Boost (psi): 0 1 5.4 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8
Pressure Ratio: 1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Airflow (lb/min): 1.5 2.5 4.7 7.5 12.2 16.5 16.5 16.1
Airflow (cfm): 22 36 68 108 176 239 240 233
Airflow (m^3/min): 0.63 1.01 1.91 3.07 4.99 6.77 6.79 6.6
Airflow (m^3/sec): 0.01 0.017 0.032 0.051 0.083 0.113 0.113 0.11
Airflow (kg/sec): 0.012 0.019 0.035 0.056 0.092 0.125 0.125

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

This is a print of my spreadsheet. I just change the numbers in red.


Attachments:

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

96% VE

and an intake of 104 degrees?!?!?

yikes!

Alex

AlexF


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:29pm AlexF2003 said:
96% VE

and an intake of 104 degrees?!?!?

yikes!

Alex


Have to agree, some strange numbers there.

This is how I would calc Robert's setup.


Attachments:

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:24pm robert said:


running 9.5 psi and 150 bhp squirrel software,stepping up ve till i get to my bhp/psi level. crude software ,but interesting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Engine RPM: 1000 1500 2250 3000 4800 6600 6750 6900
Vol Efficency: 88 89 89 89 93 96 92 87
Intake Temp: 64 65 73 80 92 104 104 104
Expected Boost (psi): 0 1 5.4 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8
Pressure Ratio: 1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Airflow (lb/min): 1.5 2.5 4.7 7.5 12.2 16.5 16.5 16.1
Airflow (cfm): 22 36 68 108 176 239 240 233
Airflow (m^3/min): 0.63 1.01 1.91 3.07 4.99 6.77 6.79 6.6
Airflow (m^3/sec): 0.01 0.017 0.032 0.051 0.083 0.113 0.113 0.11
Airflow (kg/sec): 0.012 0.019 0.035 0.056 0.092 0.125 0.125


You are using a high VE to compensate for the high inlet temp. Allowing for an intercooler and bringing the VE down will give you the same answers.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

what would you make of a someone running more like 250bhp on a 1293cc?

Alex

AlexF


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I would assume that they have managed to find an efficient turbo at 3:1 PR.

The GT1752 will do it (in theory).

Edited by Paul S on 19th Jul, 2007.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

indeed, i've been wondering what the VE will be on a K1100 lump, or a 7 port for that matter,

doesn't make choosing compressors easy!

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



robert

User Avatar

6743 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:29pm AlexF2003 said:
96% VE

and an intake of 104 degrees?!?!?

yikes!

Alex

degrees f lol

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


robert

User Avatar

6743 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus



On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 03:04pm Axel said:
I would assume that they have managed to find an efficient turbo at 3:1 PR.

who?

The GT1752 will do it (in theory).

Edited by robert on 19th Jul, 2007.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

Thats a damn efficient intercooler...it wouldn't be Nics by any chance. *laughing*

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


robert

User Avatar

6743 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:51pm Axel said:

On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:24pm robert said:


running 9.5 psi and 150 bhp squirrel software,stepping up ve till i get to my bhp/psi level. crude software ,but interesting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Engine RPM: 1000 1500 2250 3000 4800 6600 6750 6900
Vol Efficency: 88 89 89 89 93 96 92 87
Intake Temp: 64 65 73 80 92 104 104 104
Expected Boost (psi): 0 1 5.4 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8
Pressure Ratio: 1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Airflow (lb/min): 1.5 2.5 4.7 7.5 12.2 16.5 16.5 16.1
Airflow (cfm): 22 36 68 108 176 239 240 233
Airflow (m^3/min): 0.63 1.01 1.91 3.07 4.99 6.77 6.79 6.6
Airflow (m^3/sec): 0.01 0.017 0.032 0.051 0.083 0.113 0.113 0.11
Airflow (kg/sec): 0.012 0.019 0.035 0.056 0.092 0.125 0.125


You are using a high VE to compensate for the high inlet temp. Allowing for an intercooler and bringing the VE down will give you the same answers.

thats degrees f axel

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks




On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 03:04pm Axel said:
I would assume that they have managed to find an efficient turbo at 3:1 PR.

The GT1752 will do it (in theory).


I would have thought a GT28RS *indifferent*

AlexF


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10979 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Degrees F?

Must be an Age thing?

Think my Gran still works in F...

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 04:30pm robert said:



On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:51pm Axel said:

On 19th of Jul, 2007 at 02:24pm robert said:


running 9.5 psi and 150 bhp squirrel software,stepping up ve till i get to my bhp/psi level. crude software ,but interesting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Engine RPM: 1000 1500 2250 3000 4800 6600 6750 6900
Vol Efficency: 88 89 89 89 93 96 92 87
Intake Temp: 64 65 73 80 92 104 104 104
Expected Boost (psi): 0 1 5.4 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8
Pressure Ratio: 1 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Airflow (lb/min): 1.5 2.5 4.7 7.5 12.2 16.5 16.5 16.1
Airflow (cfm): 22 36 68 108 176 239 240 233
Airflow (m^3/min): 0.63 1.01 1.91 3.07 4.99 6.77 6.79 6.6
Airflow (m^3/sec): 0.01 0.017 0.032 0.051 0.083 0.113 0.113 0.11
Airflow (kg/sec): 0.012 0.019 0.035 0.056 0.092 0.125 0.125


You are using a high VE to compensate for the high inlet temp. Allowing for an intercooler and bringing the VE down will give you the same answers.

thats degrees f axel


Makes even less sense then. Inlet air at 40 deg C and a 1.7:1 PR and 96% VE should give far more than 150hp!

EDIT: calculated 188hp at those figures.

Edited by Paul S on 19th Jul, 2007.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


AlexF2003

5795 Posts
Member #: 80
AFRacing LTD

Newbury, Berks

I bet Tom works in Kelvin :p

Alex

AlexF


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

Just a quick novice question..What kind of accuracy do you get with these formulaes + or - how many BHP?

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi

Home > Technical Chat > VE of an A Series
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: