Page:
Home > Technical Chat > VE of Individual Cylinders

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I'm making progress with the Siamese Code trials although some of my recent optimism has gone. I'm waiting for a new sensor to double check the results before I publish anything.

It ocurred to me that the injection system assumes equal VE to all cylinders, so it injects an equal amount of fuel for each cylinder. If a cylinder has a lower VE it will run richer because it has less air for the fuel to burn in.

Now on the A series with the centre siamesed exhaust port, do the inner cylinders have a lower VE?

Thoughts would be appreciated as I may be chasing the impossible.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


alpa

520 Posts
Member #: 2093
Post Whore

Grenoble, France

Paul,
You know what I said 2-3 moths ago. Whatever the reason is (wall wetting, VE difference or both, I still believe in wetting) you need a different fuel quantity. Mine is running 15% less on inner. Idle is better with a 17% difference.
Spark plugs are of exactly the same color and I'm unable to make it ping even with 3-5psi boost (but staying rich of course).

std 998 A+, g295, MD266, RHF4, 109hp @0.8bar/5400rpm


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

sorry for the nooby question but what is VE? :$

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland

VE = Volumetric efficiency *smiley*

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


El Potter

User Avatar

514 Posts
Member #: 2169
Post Whore

Malta (Ex. Scotland)

Stands for Volumetric Efficiency
Means how much the cylinders fill with air/fuel mix.
You'll want to be getting 100% VE bu thats rather fanciful with siamesed ports

Warning:Stig in Training


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

That is exactly why, in an other thread, I was talking about a full sequential system with individual cylinder fuel trim (basically per-cylinder VE tables). As I said before, this will require a cam sensor to be able to identify the cylinders and 4 injector drivers to allow for staged injectors.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Isn't the argument behind 'scatter cams' also that it moreover balances out the VE of the engine over a non-scatter cam?
This should suggest that in an 'ideal' world, there will be a need for a difference between inner and outer with a 'non-scatter grind' camshaft...

Don't suppose anyone has a 276SP they want to lend for testing do they LOL.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 16th Jun, 2008 alpa said:
Paul,
You know what I said 2-3 moths ago. Whatever the reason is (wall wetting, VE difference or both, I still believe in wetting) you need a different fuel quantity. Mine is running 15% less on inner. Idle is better with a 17% difference.


Well, 15% lower VE would mean the inners running at 12.5:1 with the outers on stoich.

This is about what I'm getting.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 17th Jun, 2008 TurboDave said:
Isn't the argument behind 'scatter cams' also that it moreover balances out the VE of the engine over a non-scatter cam?
This should suggest that in an 'ideal' world, there will be a need for a difference between inner and outer with a 'non-scatter grind' camshaft...

Don't suppose anyone has a 276SP they want to lend for testing do they LOL.


I don't think that it can be cured by a different cam necessarily although it would help.

I think that the outer cylinders first get a bit of a ram effect from the inertia on the inlet because the outer inlet valve opens as the inner inlet closes. Also the inners have to accelerate the flow in the port which also loses some efficiency.

The siamesed exhaust port also must reduce the VE of the iner cylinders.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 16th Jun, 2008 jbelanger said:
That is exactly why, in an other thread, I was talking about a full sequential system with individual cylinder fuel trim (basically per-cylinder VE tables). As I said before, this will require a cam sensor to be able to identify the cylinders and 4 injector drivers to allow for staged injectors.

Jean


It could be done with the MSII, a cam sensor and two injector drivers if the injector pulse is spread around the inlet valve overlap ala MPi.

I have had the car running like this, but it would only work every second start and once dropped out of synch going over a bump!

How much coding is needed to get the cam sensor software added to the siamesed code?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 17th Jun, 2008 TurboDave said:
Isn't the argument behind 'scatter cams' also that it moreover balances out the VE of the engine over a non-scatter cam?
This should suggest that in an 'ideal' world, there will be a need for a difference between inner and outer with a 'non-scatter grind' camshaft...

Don't suppose anyone has a 276SP they want to lend for testing do they LOL.


274SP *wink*

And I Know where I can get one real cheap *wink*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Changing the cam will take me weeks given my poor health at the moment.

Making a cam sensor and modding the MSII will take a weekend.

Besides, I think the scatter pattern cam would improve the VE of inner and outer cylinders by making more use of the inlet port. Do they scatter the periods on the inner cylinder exhaust port as well?

Just need Rod and Jean to answer the above.

I think that the code is ready to take the cam sensor without mods. There are minimal mods required to the Megasquirt to take the cam sensor output.

I've ordered a hall sensor anyway.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


johnK

1425 Posts
Member #: 690
Post Whore

Norfolk

Are you running different spark on the inner/ outer cyls as well Paul?

- the last iteration of my 5 port back in 05 was running different advance curves for the inner/ outer cyls, pulled the torque curve up sooner, held it longer and made a little more at the top end. This was running an MED AGSP cam. The advance curves were dictated by by the balancing of the EGT's.

If Carling made Mini engines
it would probably be like this one!


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 17th Jun, 2008 johnK said:
Are you running different spark on the inner/ outer cyls as well Paul?

- the last iteration of my 5 port back in 05 was running different advance curves for the inner/ outer cyls, pulled the torque curve up sooner, held it longer and made a little more at the top end. This was running an MED AGSP cam. The advance curves were dictated by by the balancing of the EGT's.


No, identical ignition timing on each cylinder.

Do you think that the need for different advance curves was due to VE variations on the inner/outer cylinders?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

I recall an old CCC when Dave walker talked how he fitted two 'twin' wasted spark coils on his XR2 racer, so he could split the inner and outer cylinders - and this is on an 8-port... I recall it was a Very small, but significant improvement (given it's a race car).

John - You were sucking through a weber on the engine you're reffering to aren't you?
As we know a carb doesn't promote perfectly equal mixture distribution, is this not suggesting the injector tweeks were down to optimising the mixture variation?

Edited by turbodave16v on 17th Jun, 2008.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Paul,

Do you really think the siamesed exhaust can make a difference on VE? These pluses are a LONG way apart - admittedly not as long as the outers, but surely long enough than to not cause an issue?

Edited by turbodave16v on 17th Jun, 2008.

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



johnK

1425 Posts
Member #: 690
Post Whore

Norfolk

Dave - yes the carb was a weber - I still think with FI the distrubution will be a difficult factor to overcome

Wether its related to VE or not - can't say Paul - maybe its time to get the car onto a measuring device for some development?

If Carling made Mini engines
it would probably be like this one!


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 17th Jun, 2008 TurboDave said:
Paul,

Do you really think the siamesed exhaust can make a difference on VE? These pluses are a LONG way apart - admittedly not as long as the outers, but surely long enough than to not cause an issue?


Dave,

I believe there are a number of factors making the inner cylinders run rich. VE is one of them.

JKs experience may show that he was running more advance on the inners to compensate for the lower cylinder pressures due to the lower VE.

Also, the inner cylinder fuel is injected into a static air stream, it's another 180 degrees before the port start moving air. There may be vapourisation causing displacement of the air.

Anyway, the new wideband sensor turned up today, so this evening I'll change the sensor on the inner cylinders, just to check.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

Paul,

I'll have to look at the code. It's been a while...

I'll also look to see if it's easy to make a quick hack with the latest MS2/extra code to port the siamese code. That would be time better spent.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 17th Jun, 2008 jbelanger said:
I'll also look to see if it's easy to make a quick hack with the latest MS2/extra code to port the siamese code. That would be time better spent.

Jean


That would be great.

It looks to me that all the MSII does with the second tacho input on JS10 is synch the injector driver firing to a consistant order.

As long as that part of the extra code was working at the point you adapted it, it should be OK just to enable the second sensor.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

It was working in a slightly different way from the current code and using a different cpu pin. That's another reason why it would be good to go with the latest code.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

If it was to a different pin then it wont work with the current code, unless you know what pin it was?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

Second trigger was JS7 in the old extra code and is what it should be in the siamese code but I have no idea what would happen if you actually used it with the current code. Again, I'd need to look at the code and do some tests.

http://www.jbperf.com/

Home > Technical Chat > VE of Individual Cylinders
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: