Avon park, your best times and what was your 60 foots??
Turbo Mini Forums

Well just looking at my slip, i might have been on for my best ever time if I could improve the old starts lol.

13.6 @ 116 mph with a 2.6 sec 60 foot.

how does this 60 foot time compare with your best times?

cheers MW

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com

You should easilly be doing 2.4 60ft times Matt; or consistent 2.3s. I am at least - and our minis must weigh something like the same.

i did a 13.859 @ 101mph but i would need to check the slip for the 60 foot

car weigh's 670kg and was running 14psi boost

2.48 60ft, 16.27 @ 82.2mph.

998 running .6 ish bar

Full wight car, plus turbo bits and heavier seats, minus all the rusty bits that have dropped off.

Edited by wil_h on 19th Jul, 2008.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph

if we all copy and paste onto this then that would work ?



nic ,my quickest was a 13.071 @109.28 with a 2.323 60ft


matt ,13.6 @ 116 mph with a 2.6 sec 60 f oot

russel,13.859 @ 101mph car weigh's 670kg and was running 14psi boost

robert,2.416 60ft 13.947@103.79.
(7 psi for 7s then wavering pathetically between 12 and 17 psi .see datalog) car race weight inc driver 759kg, 3.1 diff falken tyres.

wil,2.48 60ft, 16.27 @ 82.2mph.
998 running .6 ish bar
Full wight car, plus turbo bits and heavier seats, minus all the rusty bits that have dropped off.

Edited by robert on 19th Jul, 2008.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM

my quickest was a 13.071 @109.28 with a 2.323 60ft

i did do a 2.283
and another were i crossed the line at 110mph

Im far too inconsistant

mat we need to change that diff i think to a 3.1 if you want to see your times come down on 60 ft.

my pathectic 60 ft at santa was 3secs

with a poor 16 sec run but did manage 95 mph so at least something went right on the speed front just need to sort clutch out as it kept slipping if i over cooked the start

always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas

11.3 ,1/4.

1.92 sixty foot, and 7.5 at the 1/2 track @99 mph, 126mph terminal

WWW.FORCE-RACING.CO.UK PLEASE CLICK HERE

The TT (on slicks obviously) did 13.574 @ 101.57 with a 2.264 60ft.

My 60ft time were very in consistent all day, mainly because I was taking the chance to try different techniques. In the end the technique that worked best was the one I have been using for ages. Funny that.

http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp

A man without a project is like a like a woman without a shopping list.

Best time was 12.361 @ 112.70 mph, 60ft time was 2.139, 1/8 mile 8.039 @ 91.79 mph.

I also ran a 12.863 and a 12.680 during Sunday.

Yes Robert that was a good idea about copy and paste.

Nice 60 feet time chaps, looks like I'm around 2 tenths down on the average.

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com

13.3@114.1 2.3sec 60ft 1/8th was 9.0@86.1mph

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.

14.998 @ 92.60mph 60ft=2.532 1.3 toyta turbo engine

no longer a series, but still 1.3 turbo.

Matt - I doubt very much that a 2.9 is making much of a difference. If you have more torque than traction in 1st (which you do I assume?) then it really is going to be down to finding your optimum launch technique.

lol, Dave maybe it the 14-15 psi min boost that's not helpping

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com

matt id disagree with dave ,,

if your losing .say .2 of a second over my 60 ft of 2.4s , id expect that to be more like a .3 to .4 second loss in the whole run ,

you lose the captapult effect ,and so the whole of the run loses impetus .

my bike runs a 120 to 125 terminal ,but only a 11.9 quarter , for that terminal it should be running low 11 high 10,s ,the launch is v poor so it loses out all the way up the track.

for your terminal speeds id expect a mid to high 12 .

Edited by robert on 20th Jul, 2008.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM

Matt we've spoken about this, tyres and tyre pressures my man.

i think its 0.6 bar. he just didnt put in the 0

sure 0.6 bar isnt far off 6psi though. maybe 8ish??

16 sec is about average for a hot hatch, so anything about this sort of time or lower is very good for an A series engine.

Lambo's and other super cars do around the 12 sec mark, cost around £200,000 and would get a shock buy the front runners in D class!

I think my best 60ft was in the region of 2.4secs. But struggling with power off the strip was not a problem

Back once again like a renegade master

Jeez Shed. 200 K for something that only does 12 secs.

Just reinforces my belief that super cars are only for knobby poseurs and wannabe enthusiasts.

Be a man.Build it yourself

Sorry OT

Warning:Stig in Training

Indeed,

my boss was going on about having taken his RS4 to the pod and running a 13.8 or somthing... apart from the fact he is slightly delusional and it was probably an article in a mag....

I pointed out that my mini shouldn't be far off that time, and told him some of the times that are being run PMSL

Turboshed puts it into pespective. If my Clio ran a sub 16 second quarter I would be happy. If my mini ends up scaring a few "quick" cars I will be happer still!