| Page: |
| Home > General Chat > "wet-manifold" Injection ? | |||||||
|
17 Posts Member #: 63 Member |
4th Sep, 2003 at 10:47:16am
Has anyone considered or tried wet-manifold injection with a Turbo mini ? |
||||||
|
Site Admin ![]() 9407 Posts Member #: 58 455bhp per ton 12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini Sunny Bridgend, South Wales |
4th Sep, 2003 at 02:31:43pm
Hi, I'm also working on fuel injection for my mini, let me know if you find anything interesting about the wet manifold. Which ECU are you going to use for the injection? On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:
I think the welsh one has it right! 1st to provide running proof of turbo twinkie in a car and first to run a 1/4 in one!! Is your data backed up?? one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials |
||||||
![]() 1566 Posts Member #: 36 Post Whore Basingstoke |
4th Sep, 2003 at 04:05:56pm
Why are you using fuel injection? A carb can reliably produce high power figures, and it will do it cheaply!! You could spend all that spare cash on uprating the cooling and beefing up the boost. |
||||||
![]() 48 Posts Member #: 22 Member |
4th Sep, 2003 at 06:06:20pm
because he has already done that! |
||||||
![]() 1566 Posts Member #: 36 Post Whore Basingstoke |
5th Sep, 2003 at 11:45:47am
Well, that miniwilliams car manages to produce 208bhp without the aid of fuel injection. I'm just curious as to why you would want to do it. I think you will find it will make the car less responsive if you have EFi. |
||||||
|
17 Posts Member #: 63 Member |
5th Sep, 2003 at 01:15:00pm
Just pondering at the moment....
|
||||||
|
4018 Posts Member #: 1757 Back to Fucking Tool status Swindon |
8th Jan, 2013 at 11:54:17am
Haha hoggeys old post got me thinking and i found this.... Drives
|
||||||
![]() 690 Posts Member #: 1851 Post Whore Woolavington, Zummerzet |
8th Jan, 2013 at 12:03:50pm
Doing it on purpose smacks of not-playing-nicely !!
Metric is for people who can't do fractions. |
||||||
|
4018 Posts Member #: 1757 Back to Fucking Tool status Swindon |
8th Jan, 2013 at 01:19:43pm
Yes i dis cheat abit but after reading this is made me chuckel, matt w with 208 bhp, he managed another 100 ontop of that. Jimster thinking about injection then did a 250bhp twin cam efi turbo lump.
Drives
|
||||||
|
1909 Posts Member #: 9764 Post Whore Northamptonshire. |
8th Jan, 2013 at 02:07:07pm
Fuel Injection is just better than a carb IMO with all the correct sensors fitted and working you'll be very surpirsed how much better it is and its more relieable than a carb aswell
On 5th Sep, 2003 Ric said:
Well, that miniwilliams car manages to produce 208bhp without the aid of fuel injection. I'm just curious as to why you would want to do it. I think you will find it will make the car less responsive if you have EFi. |
||||||
![]() 3329 Posts Member #: 184 Senior Member Melton Mowbray, Pie Country |
8th Jan, 2013 at 02:25:02pm
On 8th Jan, 2013 Chalkie said:
Fuel Injection is just better than a carb IMO . This is not your opinion at all. It is solid fact. But lets not start the new year with the same old discussion. Which I don't think was the point of this thread ressurection. http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
|
||||||
![]() 10022 Posts Member #: 1456 Mongo Barnsley, South Flatcapshire |
8th Jan, 2013 at 02:26:31pm
Agreed! If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of. |
||||||
| Home > General Chat > "wet-manifold" Injection ? | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |







