| Page: |
| Home > General Chat > surely not 109-115bhp at wheels | |||||||
|
1394 Posts Member #: 1346 Post Whore bromsgrove |
29th Jan, 2009 at 08:02:06pm
I must have gone toatlly wrong with my setup |
||||||
![]() 1451 Posts Member #: 328 Post Whore Seaford Rise, South Australia |
29th Jan, 2009 at 08:10:56pm
I never knew lightening the flywheel could liberate so much power lol! On 5th Sep, 2011 Vegard said:
I stand corrected. You should know ![]() |
||||||
![]() 6965 Posts Member #: 507 Fastest A Series Mini in the World leeds/wakefield. |
29th Jan, 2009 at 08:23:34pm
stop being so scinical, the kid thinks hes got a stonker of an engine ,let him think that, he's delusional and misslead but hey,. |
||||||
![]() 1451 Posts Member #: 328 Post Whore Seaford Rise, South Australia |
29th Jan, 2009 at 08:28:10pm
On 29th Jan, 2009 fastcarl said:
stop being so scinical, the kid thinks hes got a stonker of an engine ,let him think that, he's delusional and misslead but hey,. You are just excited that having two flywheels the power gains you can unleash must be immense! On 5th Sep, 2011 Vegard said:
I stand corrected. You should know ![]() |
||||||
|
115 Posts Member #: 2830 Advanced Member Costa del Northern Ireland :) |
29th Jan, 2009 at 08:30:16pm
I think he had the dyno tuned at the same time :) ha ha That mini is determined to Kill me!!!! |
||||||
|
1391 Posts Member #: 1686 Post Whore Oxford |
29th Jan, 2009 at 08:37:44pm
Not a chance.
On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one |
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
29th Jan, 2009 at 10:41:02pm
I recon that power figure was taken from an analogue dyno, and in this day and age, the only thing an analogue dyno is good for is tuning a carb. Probibly why he has lost the print out, lol, there wasnt one to start with. Edited by Sprocket on 29th Jan, 2009. On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
|
Forum Mod ![]() 5933 Posts Member #: 784 9 times Avon Park Class C winner Milton Keynes |
29th Jan, 2009 at 10:46:18pm
I wouldnt bee too sceptical, my old 296 showed 134 on Swiftunes dyno which was fairly accurate. We know theres always variances between dynos/ rr's
I seriously doubt it! |
||||||
![]() 9812 Posts Member #: 332 Resident Cylinder Head Modifier Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem |
29th Jan, 2009 at 11:28:04pm
stop been so nice carl.......lol
|
||||||
![]() 1346 Posts Member #: 2340 Post Whore Dublin Ireland |
29th Jan, 2009 at 11:39:31pm
TBH I really don’t think so As I said last years racer was running 130 at the FW and a touch over the ton at the wheels on 310 cam off set valve head race fuel 13:1 compression slipper pistons ect ect ect just ant going to happen on that spec unless the cylinder head was crafted by some space alien remember the motto man Banannnnnnnnas because that’s all these figures are how it goes on the real road is what matters.
Edited by PaulH on 29th Jan, 2009. On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:
I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers. ______________________________________________________ |
||||||
|
Forum Mod ![]() 5933 Posts Member #: 784 9 times Avon Park Class C winner Milton Keynes |
30th Jan, 2009 at 05:17:25pm
It dont matter so much how big valves are or if theyre offset, It depends on port shape therefore on who ported it.
Edited by paul wiginton on 30th Jan, 2009. I seriously doubt it! |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
30th Jan, 2009 at 05:32:14pm
That it Paul, no good having massive valves if the rest of it can't supply air to suit the size. Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
![]() 1346 Posts Member #: 2340 Post Whore Dublin Ireland |
30th Jan, 2009 at 05:56:10pm
Sorry Paul I was just trying to stay on topic rather than going into a huge post explaining every detail of the engine, which made it produce the power figures. I was relying on the fact that people on here might have to foresight to see that if I had spent the time to off set the valves, then I would have most likely spent time getting the port shape right.
On 30th Jan, 2009 paul wiginton said:
It dont matter so much how big valves are or if theyre offset, It depends on port shape therefore on who ported it. I know of a 38 x 31 offset with 6mm stems, massive ports etc etc that my 37 x 30 blew away on the flow bench by quite a margin. Paul On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:
I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers. ______________________________________________________ |
||||||
|
Forum Mod ![]() 5933 Posts Member #: 784 9 times Avon Park Class C winner Milton Keynes |
30th Jan, 2009 at 08:23:32pm
On 30th Jan, 2009 PaulH said:
Sorry Paul I was just trying to stay on topic rather than going into a huge post explaining every detail of the engine, which made it produce the power figures. I was relying on the fact that people on here might have to foresight to see that if I had spent the time to off set the valves, then I would have most likely spent time getting the port shape right. In case you are interested the head was off set to the exhaust side .030" this was done on an old slab type small valve 12G940 head I used REC 36.6 inlets and REC 31.5 exhaust which as you might be aware, it was not strictly necessary to off set the valves for this combination, I done it to get the port shape right this head had a very large number of hours spent on port work. An I was very happy with its on track performance as It manage to run a time of 1:04:52 when every 1380 in it class was running a fastest time of 1:05:40 that day, best regards, Paul. On 30th Jan, 2009 paul wiginton said: It dont matter so much how big valves are or if theyre offset, It depends on port shape therefore on who ported it. I know of a 38 x 31 offset with 6mm stems, massive ports etc etc that my 37 x 30 blew away on the flow bench by quite a margin. Paul Not saying your head aint good, its just people straight away jump on peoples banana claims saying 'No way' when it is possible. Also not saying the claim is accurate, just that it is possible on that spec as long as the head is good enough. Sorry if I upset you Paul Paul I seriously doubt it! |
||||||
![]() 1346 Posts Member #: 2340 Post Whore Dublin Ireland |
30th Jan, 2009 at 09:04:16pm
No hasstle Paul Didnt get up set, Probly sounded a little pissy no intended at all, Just spend like your self 100 of hours trying to get the motors to make these kind of figures and it piss me off when people just advertise figures like you can get 100 hp at the wheels by bolting a few bits together.
Edited by PaulH on 30th Jan, 2009. On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:
I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers. ______________________________________________________ |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
30th Jan, 2009 at 09:45:47pm
Hell no way, 100 bhp @ wheels on an n/a is not bad going, my 1380 only had 90-95 at wheels, it was quite driveable mind. Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
|
1394 Posts Member #: 1346 Post Whore bromsgrove |
31st Jan, 2009 at 08:12:34am
|
||||||
| Home > General Chat > surely not 109-115bhp at wheels | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |








