Page:
Home > General Chat > Boost control

tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

Sorry to impose my ignorance/inexperience again.
I have fitted a new engine with a head by Turbophil and a cam from Kent stated to be turbo specific.The intercooler is now in a cold airstream and it performs way beyond expectation, showing 15 lbs boost on WOT.
I have a -31 actuator, which is unchanged, and this actuator only gave me 12 lbs with the old engine,although with a bleed valve I did run 15lbs occasionally.How has the boost been increased,without changing the actuator/bleed valve ?Is there any way I can reduce the boost with the present components, as I dont feel that 15lbs will ensure any kind of reliability?
(One thing has changed - the actuator is now actuated from the feed from the compressor housing, whereas previously I fed it direct from the inlet manifold)


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

plug it back to compressor housing, boost signal is stronger there.
From inlet manifold, it has been smoothed by pipes, interccoler, plenum and carb, in your case this seem a 3 psi restriction.


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

I agree entirely with what fab says, but tadge's last sentence says he has made the opposite move so pressure should have gone down, not up...

Are you still measuring boost pressure from the same place ???

Another thought, are you now using the original brass "Tee" connector on the compressor housing (assuming it's a Metro T3)... they are quite small so you may have a restricted signal, esp. for a larger actuator.

Also, if it was on the inlet manifold before, how could it have worked reliably/consistently under closed (or closing) throttle conditions ???

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

(One thing has changed - the actuator is now actuated from the feed from the compressor housing, whereas previously I fed it direct from the inlet manifold)


fab , i think tadge is sayings its NOW on the housing ,not before ?
thats strange ,normally if you take the pressure take off to the wastegate at the plenum youd get a higher psi ,unless where it was at the plenum was a dynamic take off ...tadge ,id put it back on the plenum and see .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

Thanks guys for the quick response.
Dont understand your comment,Rod, re the poss. unreliability of taking the signal from the inlet manifold, as it gave me no problems of which I was aware. Can you expand, please ?.The boost guage was previously fed from the lean off connection on the carb flange, as covered in an earlier thread(I had run a 1/8 drill through it to remove what seemed to be a small spring and one way valve)It gave what I thought were representative boost readings AND showed the normal manifold depression on idle or closed throttle, despite what was said in the earlier thread !.The guage is now connected to a tee off the inlet manifold which also feeds the closed loop dump valve.Whether the boost guage readings are now inconsistent with each other is open to conjecture, but it sure as hell reaches for the horizon a LOT quicker than it ever did. Robert, will try what you suggest when I can get the silly grin off my face every time I gas it.I think we live quite close, I,m near H/Wycombe -maybe you could look at it sometime ?.


tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

Oh, and no one has suggested how I might actually be able to control(reduce) the boost without changing components ,yet.


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

Would it not be a simple test to put the boost gauge back to its old feed point, just to see?

I agree with the above, I would expect the boost pressure to go down rather than up by changeing the actuator feed from the plenum to the compressor.

I really can't see how it would be higher, have you increased the pre-load on the actuator at all?

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk


On 18th Feb, 2009 tadge44 said:

Dont understand your comment,Rod, re the poss. unreliability of taking the signal from the inlet manifold, as it gave me no problems of which I was aware. Can you expand, please ?


Do you mean the actual inlet manifold or the plenum (as Robert interpreted it) previously ???

If its the actual inlet manifold, as soon as the throttle plate in the carb closes, the signal will be lost completely so the wastegate will no longer be able to open.

Granted, the exhaust flow will drop to next to nothing anyway, and if you have a dumpvalve the compressor is protected but what is going to happen at part throttle conditions to the pressure signal ???

fab points out all the losses to the signal from bends, intercooler etc, but these are all "constants", a moving throttle plate isn't......

As for a solution..... well you can't do the opposite of bleeding as you need a stronger signal, is the rod on the actuator adjustable to effectively weaken the spring load ???

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Coupe

User Avatar

998 Posts
Member #: 2178
Post Whore

Leyland, Lancs

I think a -31 actuator should have an adjustable rod so lengthen it a few turns and see how much the boost drops by.

On 15th Jul, 2009 fastcarl said:
a breif struggle ensued but Will emerged the victor with a pair of undies in his possesion


On 21st Sep, 2009 apbellamy said:
No, but you did chuck your guts up over my front gate the Saturday before! You even managed to get a bit in your arm pit...


tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

Thanks guys.
I am more confused than ever now Rod,as you seem to have interpreted what I have been saying as if I am feeding the actuator from the manifold whereas I am feeding it direct from the brass T on the compresor housing, as I said originally. I am now going to go away and boil my head for a while to try and work out what I am doing wrong.I shall try the simple expedient of switching the boost guage back,but the boost is clearly much higher ,going by the power.I am beginning to suspect a leak somewhere between the brass T and the actuator but my installation is so cramped I cant get in there without stripping away a lot of stuff.If I do, then I will also try lengthening the rod.May take a while - dont like testing on wet roads and we got a new grandson 48 hours ago, which is a bit of a distraction.


steve1275

User Avatar

861 Posts
Member #: 951
Post Whore

Bromsgrove

Congratulations!Another TM grandad.No doubt the higher authority is in great excite,requiring much of your time.
15psi rear wheel drive wet roads=very scary!

'Where does the engine go?'


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 18th Feb, 2009 tadge44 said:
Thanks guys.
I am more confused than ever now Rod,as you seem to have interpreted what I have been saying as if I am feeding the actuator from the manifold whereas I am feeding it direct from the brass T on the compresor housing, as I said originally.


No, I was referring to your 1st post where you said you were previously feeding it from the inlet manifold...... (and had now switched to the compressor housing).

Others have interpretted previously manifold as previously plenum, I just took the word manifold at face value and questioned how it could have previously worked consistently if the previous signal was actually from the manifold (ie, after the carb butterfly)

EDIT - typos

EDIT 2 - it reads awful but I hope you see what I mean....

EDIT 3 (if the cat will get off the keyboard....) - Now that it's off the brass Tee, what is the other side of the Tee doing ??? are you losing some pressure down there ???

Edited by Rod S on 18th Feb, 2009.

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

the other thing i can thing ok mate, is that as you have changed the engine a little the flow of it all has changed and that might be why there is a difference in pressue, so you might have to adjust things to suit your new set up *happy*

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

yes i agree mat , a much better flowing intercooler could have eased the flow ,so instead of losing ,say 3 psi ,through it your losing next to nothing so you get a 3 psi gain at the carb .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York




On 18th Feb, 2009 robert said:
yes i agree mat , a much better flowing intercooler could have eased the flow ,so instead of losing ,say 3 psi ,through it your losing next to nothing so you get a 3 psi gain at the carb .


I thought this originally, but it makes no sense. The actuator will still operate at the same boost, so how can there be more?

If the inlet is more efficient it just means less pressure fifferance across the turbine i.e. the wastegate will operate at a lower rpm. So you will have more power but at the same boost.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


James_H

User Avatar

3692 Posts
Member #: 1833
Formally mini_majic

Auckland, New Zealand

i think something must have happened to your bleed valve. maybe it has been adjusted by accident in the instalation for example. or it was last on 15psi but you had forgotten?

is the bleed valve fully closed and giving 15psi? can you adjust it at all?

is your actuator set to 12psi or are you bleeding off to 12?

without either the bleed vlave being adjusted or the wastegate actuator being touched i cannot see how the opening pressure has changed. if the actuator is set to open at 12psi it should always open at 15psi (provided there is no signal being bled off!) if nothing is amiss with the set-up then there much be a leak in the pipe that runs from the compressor to the actuator.

if you change it and there is no difference then adjust the actuaor back to the desired level.


tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

Bleed valve fully closed.I needed to open it to get 15 psi with the old engine etc.This is becoming a bit of an epic and I do appreciate the ideas.Give me time to sort out a few and I will report progress, if any.


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 18th Feb, 2009 wil_h said:



On 18th Feb, 2009 robert said:
yes i agree mat , a much better flowing intercooler could have eased the flow ,so instead of losing ,say 3 psi ,through it your losing next to nothing so you get a 3 psi gain at the carb .


I thought this originally, but it makes no sense. The actuator will still operate at the same boost, so how can there be more?

If the inlet is more efficient it just means less pressure fifferance across the turbine i.e. the wastegate will operate at a lower rpm. So you will have more power but at the same boost.



the actuator operates at say 15 psi ,but the original ic created a flow restriction equal ot a loss of boost down to 13 psi ,measured at the intake ..then a bigger ic is installed ,and the 15 psi at the compressor ,ends up as close to 15 psi at the intake ,so the guage reads 15 psi ,instead of 13 .....yes the compressor is putting out the same pressure on both occasions .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

Wrong -its the same intercooler, just placed in a cool airstream whereas before it was badly positioned and pretty ineffective.


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

AND the signal hase been moved from plenum to compressor.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


theoneeyedlizard

User Avatar

7265 Posts
Member #: 1268
The Boom Boom speaker Police!

Essex

Could you have had a slight leak from one of the boost hoses previously? Then by moving the cooler and re plumbing the pipework you have fixed the leak?

Either way, you need to adjust the actuator pre-load or (if this is not possible) fit a different actuator.

In the 13's at last!.. Just


tadge44

3006 Posts
Member #: 2500
Post Whore

Buckinghamshire

I,ve sorted it !! Now running a nice steady 12lbs without the bleed valve,measured at the manifold(I now understand that the -31 actuator usually opens at 15 lbs which is consistent with the apparent pressure loss through the I/C) In the workshop by 7.30 to get something done before we dash off to see grandsprog and bit the bullet by stripping out all the pipework tp see whats happening.It was so simple even I realised what it was - a clip on the line from compressor to actuator was too big and had not closed down properly, also the bleed valve, previously shut right down, was slightly open, probably because the locking grubscrew had fallen out.Re assembled with all clips done up properly - road tested -big grin all round.
The possibility of a leak had been suggested and I was reluctant to set about stripping so much (you have not seen how cramped the engine bay is ) but the best answers are often the simplest.
Big thanks all round to everyone for putting up with my inexperience - hopefully it can only get better.


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

On 18th Feb, 2009 tadge44 said:
I have fitted a new engine with a head by Turbophil



:):)

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

glad you have sorted it mate.

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com

Home > General Chat > Boost control
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: