Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > Beginners Tech > Benefits of GT series turbos?

miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

Okay, I got to reading up on some of the GT turbos. What's the real benefit? As far as I can tell the only real difference is the ball bearing instead of regular bearings. Did I miss read somewhere or is this the case? In a different thread it was recommended that I go with a GT15 turbo for my 850cc project. Now, I assume this is because of size of the motor, which is fine. But I was wondering, for the larger turbos, wouldn't a T3(yes I know, outdated...) from the likes of Turbonetics be just as good? They are now using ball bearings in almost all of their turbos.
Thoughts?

-James


Kean

User Avatar

2406 Posts
Member #: 341
aka T2clubby

South Staffs

Ball bearing cores are not really of concern to us, as they only start from the GT25 series upwards.

The main difference of the Gt turbos is the effiency of them compared to old hat T2/T3 style turbochargers. They have quicker spool times, higher pressure ratio capability and are generally much better due to improvements in design over the last 20 years. Just remember how old the standard T3 design is, things can only get better.


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

yep, they generally flow more for their wheel sizes, and as a result have less inertia, also they can be designed hold their efficiency at higher pressures.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

ah. okay. That clears some up. Now, lets say a GT15 turbo doesn't hold enough power for the 850, theoretically, would a GT25 be best then?
-James


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

The GT1548 will flow enough air for 120hp.

You are going to need 15-20 psi boost to get that from an 850.

You will not benefit from using a larger turbo.

Do the air flow and pressure ratio calcs for your engine and then work with the compressor maps.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

a gt15 will,

next size up is a gt17 in a 52 trim wheel thats good for over 200hp,

then theres a 20, 22 then the gt25.

a 25 is huge, they use them on the focus RS.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

have a play with this calculator,

it has some (but not all!) GT maps

set the ve to about 80% that sould be an ok starting point



http://www.motorgeek.com/index.php?page=6

Edited by Joe C on 10th Sep, 2009.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

Ah. So gt17 would probably be the ticket then once I have the motor built. Now, here's the thought. I'm building the motor to the nines, everything built for turbo(crank, rods and pistons included). What would be the estimated power output would someone say of an extremely well sorted 850cc turbo with a GT17 or a GT20? I'm looking for no less than 125bhp, but I would want more.

-James


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

tbh i think even the gt15 might be a bit big,

depends on the wheels,

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 10th Sep, 2009 miniswordsman said:
Ah. So gt17 would probably be the ticket then once I have the motor built. Now, here's the thought. I'm building the motor to the nines, everything built for turbo(crank, rods and pistons included). What would be the estimated power output would someone say of an extremely well sorted 850cc turbo with a GT17 or a GT20? I'm looking for no less than 125bhp, but I would want more.

-James


If you want more than 125bhp, then do not start with an 850. They are not known for their strength.

However, a fairly standard 998 A+ will be OK up to around 150 hp or more.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Ben H

User Avatar

3329 Posts
Member #: 184
Senior Member

Melton Mowbray, Pie Country

Well the GT17 works very well on our racer and is good for 150+ bananas on a 998. A mate has an 875 imp engine with a GT17 on and that works well too, but it revs much more than a mini engine.

If you are building it for the ultimate 850 turbo then I think the GT17 could work well. You will need to do the maths though really, and don't expect boost much below about 4k.

http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp

A man without a project is like a like a woman without a shopping list.


miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

That's about what I'm figuring. I know a 850 is really not the place to start, but it's unique I think. How many people on this forum, or anywhere really, have a 850cc A-series turbo mini? When I have Crower do up my crank and rods and such I'm going to have them do the crank for high rev. I'm looking to get 8500 to 9500 rpms out of the motor, and still have it be as reliable a motor as one like this could be...


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I thought long and hard about using an 850 for my turbo/mpg project. In the end, I decided to take the easy route and use the 998.

850 cranks can be workked to run at 9000rpm, according to Vizard. I've got one destined for a 980cc K100 motor.

850 rods have pinch bolts so should be thrown and use 998 rods instead. They should be a straight fit.

I'm not aware of any 850 pistons that are currently available that will be up to the job. You can get 998 Hypatecs, but it will be a big overbore and you will need to deck the block.

You will need to fit cam bearings in the block as they are not fitted as standard.

Best of luck.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

I plan on having crower do the whole bit up for me. Custom crank, titanium con rods and custom pistons dished for turbo use. When they have it in shop I'll have them line bore and install the cam bearings as well, because as you said they are not fitted.


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Titanium con rods?

For an 850?

Is it april 1st again, or do you have bottomless pockets?

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

I'm just willing to pay a lot to get what I want. They're $560 a piece, so roughly 335 pounds a piece. But Crower guarantees against their failure. The whole motor is probably going to cost $6,000(3500 pounds). Granted this is without the gearbox, but it will create a much more reliable motor, and a much more powerful one because the parts will be lighter and better balanced. Like they say, you get what you pay for. However, MED's forced induction motor is 5700 pounds, or $9,500 U.S. currency, which is what I'm going to spend roughly for the whole motor and tranny as well, but have a motor that is tricked to the nines.

-James


miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

Not to mention, it'll be one of the few 850's that can keep up with quite a few 1275cc motors...


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

I must say that while you will have a unique engine, you'd get at least 50% more power starting from a 1275 and would not spend more than what you will on the 850. And it would still be unique with those parts.

I just don't see the point.

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I don't think this project is about the ultimate forced induction motor, it's about the ultimate 850 motor.

It'll certinally be the fastest 850 A-series on the plannet, and that will be an achievement.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph

www.twin-turbo.co.uk

On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

Buy a 970 engine, turbo that..

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

Keep us updated, sounds very interesting. If these titanium rods are any good it could Id like to know

Paul

I seriously doubt it!


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

I like innovation and doing something different.

But a £10k 850 Turbo is unlikley to polish your ego any more than a £2k 998 Turbo.

I was questioned by a few people on here when, in 2005, I said I wanted to turbo a 998 for a road car. Up until then the majority of 998 Turbos were for racing to meet class rules.

My reason was to test a theory that I've held from the 70s that I could produce a much more economical performance Mini with a smaller engine but turboed for top end performance.

I've recently achieved the aim of running a 998 Turbo on the road.

BUT, boost is addictive *happy* *happy* *happy* *happy*

I can't keep my foot out of when I'm driving and the mpg is irrelevant. Now I want more power and I'm thinking of improving the head and fitted piston buttons so that I can get more POWER.

The point I'm trying to make is that the idea of doing something different is OK until the reality sets in.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

thing that gets me and no offence ment, but your in the states how many other 1275 mini's do you know of? why not build the crazyest 1275 for 1380 what ever to race against the yank cars and ricers? big power 13's or 10's on hooser tires longish diff and a k1100 head or a k100 head turbod with all the power you can get? would probably be more fun

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE

paul its clear why......
he's american....

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


miniswordsman

617 Posts
Member #: 6558
Post Whore

Pueblo, Colorado, USA

Normally I would agree with you that it's because I'm american, but you have to give me credit where it's due, normally americans like big bore, gas sucking behemoths. Remember the muscle car era....? And thanks to those of you that can see my vision(wil_h, paul wiginton, and ben H primarily). I'm looking for the ultimate of ultimate 850's. And if I can keep up with your 1275's on the 1/4 or the street, whos to argue who has the better motor?

-James

Home > Beginners Tech > Benefits of GT series turbos?
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: