Page:
Home > General Chat > here's another PC one for the clever buffs.

Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

Is a (figs just pick out of the air for an example)

Dual core 2.6GHz Processor better or, not as good as say a quad Core 2 GHz Processor?

i would guess if you add them together the quad is better but i don't know if that's how they work? Sorry for the questions, I'm still looking at my options.

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


Anton

User Avatar

1050 Posts
Member #: 764
Post Whore

Staffordshire

If you can afford the quad go for that.


BadgerBaiter

499 Posts
Member #: 2257
Senior Member

Brighton

Also depends which version of the quad you go for. Some are more power efficient than others, ie use less power and produce less heat.
Also means there is more overclocking potential.
I currently have my Core 2 Duo 3Ghz overclocked to 4ghz and it runs everything I want extremely well.
Saying that, I want to build a new computer soon with a nice i7 and lots of RAM *happy*

http://www.jolyonway.com


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands

i've just built a new one with a 2.6ghz quad core and i can't fault it matt, came in at under £200 for the board, cpu and 2x1gb ram.

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

On 5th Feb, 2010 Nick said:
i've just built a new one with a 2.6ghz quad core and i can't fault it matt, came in at under £200 for the board, cpu and 2x1gb ram.

You need more RAM. In effect, your sharing 2GB between 4 processors. I'd be putting 4GB in as a minimum.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


Brett

User Avatar

9502 Posts
Member #: 1023
Post Whore

Doncaster, South Yorkshire




On 5th Feb, 2010 Miniwilliams said:
Is a (figs just pick out of the air for an example)

Dual core 2.6GHz Processor better or, not as good as say a quad Core 2 GHz Processor?

i would guess if you add them together the quad is better but i don't know if that's how they work? Sorry for the questions, I'm still looking at my options.



i have a list ( maybe 6months out of date now) but anyway the list puts all available processors in order of their processing ability and takes into account price weighs up pros n cons of each, ill dig the mag out and scan if you want?

Yes i moved to the darkside *happy*

Instagram @jdm_brett


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

as always guys super advice. just if there wasn't so much out there it would be so easy to choose. If you get time brett that might be of help thanks.

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


BadgerBaiter

499 Posts
Member #: 2257
Senior Member

Brighton

Also, dont forget your graphics card,
If you run say a card with 1GB of memory, then that gets taken out of the total amount of RAM available, even before processes are being run!
I have 8GB, so with my 1gig card I am running 7GB essentially...

http://www.jolyonway.com


t@z

User Avatar

2054 Posts
Member #: 452
Post Whore

Chester, UK

dont gpu's have there own onboard memory? its only things like the macbooks or eqiv that there "intergrated" gpus share physical ram

On 6th Feb, 2010 BadgerBaiter said:
Also, dont forget your graphics card,
If you run say a card with 1GB of memory, then that gets taken out of the total amount of RAM available, even before processes are being run!
I have 8GB, so with my 1gig card I am running 7GB essentially...

www.twitter.com/lilpinkiy


colas

566 Posts
Member #: 102
Post Whore

Pennsylvania USA

Unless it's an on board graphics card they don't use system RAM


BadgerBaiter

499 Posts
Member #: 2257
Senior Member

Brighton

This is correct its onboard memory.
The problem is that a 32 bit OS can only address 4GB in TOTAL.
It shouldnt really be an issue, unless you are running 2GB of system ram and 1GB cards in SLi or Crossfire.

http://www.jolyonway.com


Jason G

User Avatar

4360 Posts
Member #: 1459
En-suite user

Braintree, Essex

I always use a seperate graphics card. Better choice and cost effective to upgrade. If it packs up you don't have to buy another motherboard.


On 6th Feb, 2010 colas said:
Unless it's an on board graphics card they don't use system RAM

On 19th Jan, 2010 wil_h said:
I would start the furthest place from the finish.


On 24th Mar, 2012 apbellamy said:
I feel all special knowing that I've given your mum my wood.


Been neglecting Turbo'd 'A' series..............


BadgerBaiter

499 Posts
Member #: 2257
Senior Member

Brighton

Personally, if I were in your position. I would get the fastest dual core you can afford.
The reason for this is, to make the most of quad cores etc, special code has to be written to make enable the use of multithreading, and most software just doesnt come with this code.
Unless you will be running 3d modelling software or doing a lot of video and audio compression etc, it just isn't worth it IMHO.
As of Adobe CS3, they have only enabled multithreading for what they deem the most demanding tasks... they seem to be avoiding running it throughout at the moment.
As of CS4 they are using the GPU power more so having a more powerful card will actually serve you better.
I run photoshop very happily on this:
Windows 7 Pro 64 bit OS, 3Ghz Core 2 clocked to 4Ghz, 8GB RAM and a 1GB graphics card.
I thought about getting a 2.6 quad core of the same age as my current processor, but I just dont have the need for it quite yet.

http://www.jolyonway.com


colas

566 Posts
Member #: 102
Post Whore

Pennsylvania USA

Yeah IMO I would go for dual core. I got the E8500, awesome chip. Just make sure you get plenty of RAM and 64 bit windows for doing photos and videos. The more the better.

Edited by colas on 6th Feb, 2010.


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

cheers chaps. As with most things pc it gets deeper and deeper, Noted, no need for a quad core :)

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


BadgerBaiter

499 Posts
Member #: 2257
Senior Member

Brighton

:)
Definately get the 64bit OS.
Photoshop is now 64 bit happy as well.
I did some reading up on it, and its just seems to be that some of the filters can specifically make the most of the a quad core.. ie gaussian blur and noise. I still think dual core is more than adequate but really depends on money being thrown at it, as with all things *wink*

http://www.jolyonway.com


Nick
Forum Mod

User Avatar

4828 Posts
Member #: 154
Post Whore

Midlands




On 6th Feb, 2010 apbellamy said:
On 5th Feb, 2010 Nick said:
i've just built a new one with a 2.6ghz quad core and i can't fault it matt, came in at under £200 for the board, cpu and 2x1gb ram.

You need more RAM. In effect, your sharing 2GB between 4 processors. I'd be putting 4GB in as a minimum.


thats the plan, just wanted to stick 2 in for now to get it up and running. it's just an upgrade from my ancient 3ghz pentium 4 with 1gb ram....oooo the speed, lol.

On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:

Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF.

Home > General Chat > here's another PC one for the clever buffs.
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: