| Page: |
| Home > General Chat > here's another PC one for the clever buffs. | |||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
5th Feb, 2010 at 11:09:40pm
Is a (figs just pick out of the air for an example)
Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
|
1050 Posts Member #: 764 Post Whore Staffordshire |
5th Feb, 2010 at 11:20:57pm
If you can afford the quad go for that. |
||||||
|
499 Posts Member #: 2257 Senior Member Brighton |
5th Feb, 2010 at 11:33:22pm
Also depends which version of the quad you go for. Some are more power efficient than others, ie use less power and produce less heat.
|
||||||
|
Forum Mod ![]() 4828 Posts Member #: 154 Post Whore Midlands |
5th Feb, 2010 at 11:36:57pm
i've just built a new one with a 2.6ghz quad core and i can't fault it matt, came in at under £200 for the board, cpu and 2x1gb ram. On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:
Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF. |
||||||
![]() 16540 Posts Member #: 4241 King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner Rotherham, South Yorkshire |
6th Feb, 2010 at 08:51:40am
On 5th Feb, 2010 Nick said:
i've just built a new one with a 2.6ghz quad core and i can't fault it matt, came in at under £200 for the board, cpu and 2x1gb ram. You need more RAM. In effect, your sharing 2GB between 4 processors. I'd be putting 4GB in as a minimum. On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it
|
||||||
![]() 9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
6th Feb, 2010 at 09:16:36am
On 5th Feb, 2010 Miniwilliams said:
Is a (figs just pick out of the air for an example) Dual core 2.6GHz Processor better or, not as good as say a quad Core 2 GHz Processor? i would guess if you add them together the quad is better but i don't know if that's how they work? Sorry for the questions, I'm still looking at my options. i have a list ( maybe 6months out of date now) but anyway the list puts all available processors in order of their processing ability and takes into account price weighs up pros n cons of each, ill dig the mag out and scan if you want? Yes i moved to the darkside |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
6th Feb, 2010 at 09:48:00am
as always guys super advice. just if there wasn't so much out there it would be so easy to choose. If you get time brett that might be of help thanks. Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
|
499 Posts Member #: 2257 Senior Member Brighton |
6th Feb, 2010 at 01:27:37pm
Also, dont forget your graphics card,
|
||||||
![]() 2054 Posts Member #: 452 Post Whore Chester, UK |
6th Feb, 2010 at 01:33:36pm
dont gpu's have there own onboard memory? its only things like the macbooks or eqiv that there "intergrated" gpus share physical ram
On 6th Feb, 2010 BadgerBaiter said:
Also, dont forget your graphics card, If you run say a card with 1GB of memory, then that gets taken out of the total amount of RAM available, even before processes are being run! I have 8GB, so with my 1gig card I am running 7GB essentially... |
||||||
|
566 Posts Member #: 102 Post Whore Pennsylvania USA |
6th Feb, 2010 at 01:59:55pm
Unless it's an on board graphics card they don't use system RAM |
||||||
|
499 Posts Member #: 2257 Senior Member Brighton |
6th Feb, 2010 at 02:19:36pm
This is correct its onboard memory.
|
||||||
![]() 4360 Posts Member #: 1459 En-suite user Braintree, Essex |
6th Feb, 2010 at 02:21:44pm
I always use a seperate graphics card. Better choice and cost effective to upgrade. If it packs up you don't have to buy another motherboard.
On 6th Feb, 2010 colas said:
Unless it's an on board graphics card they don't use system RAM On 19th Jan, 2010 wil_h said:
I would start the furthest place from the finish. On 24th Mar, 2012 apbellamy said:
I feel all special knowing that I've given your mum my wood. Been neglecting Turbo'd 'A' series.............. |
||||||
|
499 Posts Member #: 2257 Senior Member Brighton |
6th Feb, 2010 at 03:41:14pm
Personally, if I were in your position. I would get the fastest dual core you can afford.
|
||||||
|
566 Posts Member #: 102 Post Whore Pennsylvania USA |
6th Feb, 2010 at 04:06:44pm
Yeah IMO I would go for dual core. I got the E8500, awesome chip. Just make sure you get plenty of RAM and 64 bit windows for doing photos and videos. The more the better. Edited by colas on 6th Feb, 2010. |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
6th Feb, 2010 at 06:16:25pm
cheers chaps. As with most things pc it gets deeper and deeper, Noted, no need for a quad core :) Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
|
499 Posts Member #: 2257 Senior Member Brighton |
6th Feb, 2010 at 09:12:19pm
:)
|
||||||
|
Forum Mod ![]() 4828 Posts Member #: 154 Post Whore Midlands |
6th Feb, 2010 at 10:17:47pm
On 6th Feb, 2010 apbellamy said:
On 5th Feb, 2010 Nick said:
i've just built a new one with a 2.6ghz quad core and i can't fault it matt, came in at under £200 for the board, cpu and 2x1gb ram. You need more RAM. In effect, your sharing 2GB between 4 processors. I'd be putting 4GB in as a minimum. thats the plan, just wanted to stick 2 in for now to get it up and running. it's just an upgrade from my ancient 3ghz pentium 4 with 1gb ram....oooo the speed, lol. On 20th Oct, 2015 Tom Fenton said:
Well here is the news, you are not welcome here, FUCK OFF. |
||||||
| Home > General Chat > here's another PC one for the clever buffs. | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |








