| Page: |
| Home > General Chat > charge cooling ...methanol injection | |||||||
![]() 216 Posts Member #: 5647 Senior Member swindon wiltshire |
16th Apr, 2010 at 09:52:32pm
well boys thought id chuck up a post to see what kind of information pops up.
|
||||||
|
3594 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
17th Apr, 2010 at 01:00:35am
I'm surprised more arent using it too, and a chargecooler should offer better cooling by design. Albeit more complicated packaging. But there would be more freedom with size of the cooler.
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
|
806 Posts Member #: 989 Post Whore North Yorkshire |
17th Apr, 2010 at 11:08:24am
The big downside to a chargecooler is that if the water leaks or the pump fails you have lost your cooling. An intercooler normally has no moving parts to fail. |
||||||
|
3594 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
17th Apr, 2010 at 11:43:49am
On 17th Apr, 2010 metroturbo said:
The big downside to a chargecooler is that if the water leaks or the pump fails you have lost your cooling. An intercooler normally has no moving parts to fail. It would be a very very bodged setup to have leaks. You could say the same about your cars cooling system. A water/charge cooler can be much smaller for any given cooling capacity, and the A2W core could be mounted almost anywhere....even inside the cabin if need be, with only a thin water radiator up front. 9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
![]() 216 Posts Member #: 5647 Senior Member swindon wiltshire |
17th Apr, 2010 at 01:21:36pm
i think it could really interesting to see what kinda of difference in intake temps from a commonly used mini intercooler (cossie 2wd) and charge cooler system...could even monitor the water temps for the cooler to ensure higher boost cars are within certain perameters to avoid det ?? |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
17th Apr, 2010 at 05:30:49pm
i was always told that a charge cooler is better for short sprints IE 1/4s ect and an intercooler is better for higher speeds and long runs. Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
![]() 1424 Posts Member #: 2810 Formally spanner181187 Dublin, Ireland |
17th Apr, 2010 at 05:46:59pm
On 17th Apr, 2010 Miniwilliams said:
i was always told that a charge cooler is better for short sprints IE 1/4s ect and an intercooler is better for higher speeds and long runs. I assume the lasting capabilities of a charge cooler is all down to coolant capacity and rad efficiency. Big coolant capacities and rads will add weight so I would imagine it's just a matter or compromise On 12th Nov, 2009 Paul S said:
I think Gary OS has taken over my role as the forum smart arse ![]() On 30th Apr, 2010 Rod S said:
Gary's description is best |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
17th Apr, 2010 at 05:55:20pm
i would say that's spot on Gary, every thing at some point is a compromise. Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
|
3594 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
17th Apr, 2010 at 05:58:44pm
water is better at cooling...so clearly a well designed system will always be better than one using air/air.
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
|
806 Posts Member #: 989 Post Whore North Yorkshire |
17th Apr, 2010 at 06:07:08pm
I was pointing out the downside that it has the capability to leak, which is exactly the same as a cars coolant system (which aren't unknown to leak when fitted as the factory intended on any car). An intercooler can only leak air. A charge cooler system can leak air and water.
On 17th Apr, 2010 stevieturbo said:
It would be a very very bodged setup to have leaks. You could say the same about your cars cooling system. A water/charge cooler can be much smaller for any given cooling capacity, and the A2W core could be mounted almost anywhere....even inside the cabin if need be, with only a thin water radiator up front. |
||||||
|
806 Posts Member #: 989 Post Whore North Yorkshire |
17th Apr, 2010 at 06:10:49pm
Unfortunately, you have to cool that water with air so you are back to the downside of an intercooler.
On 17th Apr, 2010 stevieturbo said:
water is better at cooling...so clearly a well designed system will always be better than one using air/air. |
||||||
![]() 216 Posts Member #: 5647 Senior Member swindon wiltshire |
17th Apr, 2010 at 10:54:47pm
the one thing i was thinking was with a chargecooler do you think its an easier thing to monitor with readings of the water temps cooling the charger.. knowing exactly what temp the water is and knowing the intake temps are being cooled sufficiently, must have some benefits ?? |
||||||
| Home > General Chat > charge cooling ...methanol injection | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |




