| Page: |
| Home > Technical Chat > Torque/VE | |||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Sep, 2010 at 06:28:55pm
Right,
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 06:33:56pm
poor boost control paul in mine..
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Sep, 2010 at 06:47:33pm
Here is the corresponding boost curve:
Edited by Paul S on 28th Sep, 2010. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
857 Posts Member #: 1778 Post Whore Northants |
28th Sep, 2010 at 07:00:16pm
Could it be sorted fuelling? whether it be Fuel Injection or clever use of the choke? |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Sep, 2010 at 07:12:22pm
Could be. All the 1275s were getting richer as the revs went up.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 07:12:39pm
heres my 12 psi run ,see how the torque curve follows the boost a bit ..
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 2406 Posts Member #: 341 aka T2clubby South Staffs |
28th Sep, 2010 at 07:40:08pm
Mine was dropping off due to turbine back pressure. |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Sep, 2010 at 08:00:18pm
On 28th Sep, 2010 t2clubby said:
Mine was dropping off due to turbine back pressure. Was this your hybrid? Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 08:07:31pm
better one
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
28th Sep, 2010 at 08:12:42pm
I think the TT is looking pretty flat, the only reason it suddenly falls away is the rev limiter. Holds boost too.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Sep, 2010 at 08:13:10pm
Is this the correct lambda curve?
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 08:32:28pm
On 28th Sep, 2010 Paul S said:
Right, I'm trying to get a flat torque curve on the next version of the 998Ti. If possible all the way up to 7500rpm. unlikely to get a flat curve all the way from say 2000 to 7500 paul .if you do well youll get a flatish band of 4000rpm .. ...the greater the sophistication the wider the band . so doing.. really well youll have 3500 to 7500rpm power band averagely youll get 4500 to 7500rpm power band poorly youll get 5000 to 7500rpm power band . im imagining a torque curve were every value is within 20% of max trq in this band . Edited by robert on 28th Sep, 2010. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 08:35:57pm
On 28th Sep, 2010 Paul S said:
Is this the correct lambda curve?
Looks pretty flat to me. ahh yes i was wrong i was thinking of the higher boosts i think that does actually get a tiny bit richer .
Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Sep, 2010 at 08:56:13pm
On 28th Sep, 2010 robert said:
unlikely to get a flat curve all the way from say 2000 to 7500 paul .if you do well youll get a flatish band of 4000rpm .. ...the greater the sophistication the wider the band . so doing.. really well youll have 3500 to 7500rpm power band averagely youll get 4500 to 7500rpm power band poorly youll get 5000 to 7500rpm power band . im imagining a torque curve were every value is within 20% of max trq in this band . I've currently got a flat curve from 4k to 6k ish. That's within about 95% max torque. I would be happy with 4.5k to 7.5k. That's a 50% increase in useable rev range. Just trying to get my head around the reason why so many suffer from this huge drop in torque past around 4-5k. I'm pretty sure it is a VE issue related to the head and cam rather than the turbo selection. We have a a full range of T2, T3 and Gt17 in the above and they all suffer the same traits. Maybe, it's a fact of life with turbos, but it would be good to find a way around it. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:00:20pm
Its almost like the dynamics of the turbo need to change throughout the rev range. On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:03:01pm
yes but ... you can have a stonking big valve head , ideal cam to suit ,then run a r5 t2 and have it all nose dive at 5 k ,the turbo can definately do it in ,just as well as anything else . Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 1137 Posts Member #: 1450 Post Whore Near Paris - France |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:03:04pm
Naive solution :
Edited by Advantage on 28th Sep, 2010. Rusty by nature
On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:
They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!" |
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:06:18pm
i think the trq graph is a bit misleading ,ill make a zero scale one ..
Edited by robert on 28th Sep, 2010. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
|
857 Posts Member #: 1778 Post Whore Northants |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:13:31pm
On 28th Sep, 2010 Advantage said:
So if you don't want your torque to drop, let your boost go up
Hmm, bit of a hijack but I like the sound of that, would it work? With ebc you could increase the boost under certain loads, therefore not increasing torque (aka kill std gearbox) but just keeping the level up to get the flatish curve all the way to the red line... |
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:23:08pm
a flat boost control limit will still show the characteristic curve of the cam, so increase/ decrease boost to flatten out the torque curve.
On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:28:41pm
On 28th Sep, 2010 Sprocket said:
a flat boost control limit will still show the characteristic curve of the cam not necessarily... eg if the head wont flow enough ,the cam cant show its true colours .. or if the inlet or ex are a restriction if the valve springs are too soft , or the ignition weak if the fuel is wrong or timing out all these things can completely mask a good cam ,and make it appear mediocre. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
![]() 1745 Posts Member #: 375 Post Whore Leicestershire |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:29:16pm
My engine on that day was running rich through the whole range as it was low on boost due to a pikey boost control!
|
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Sep, 2010 at 09:38:32pm
On 28th Sep, 2010 sturgeo said:
On 28th Sep, 2010 Advantage said:
So if you don't want your torque to drop, let your boost go up
Hmm, bit of a hijack but I like the sound of that, would it work? With ebc you could increase the boost under certain loads, therefore not increasing torque (aka kill std gearbox) but just keeping the level up to get the flatish curve all the way to the red line... The point of this thread is to understand the reason for the drop in torque rather than develope a fudge around it. As robert says, there could be any number of reasons for it, but given that most of us suffer from it, it should be possible to identify the cause. EDIT: 8 degrees more advanced pushed up the whole curve, so is ignition that significant?
Edited by Paul S on 28th Sep, 2010. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 1137 Posts Member #: 1450 Post Whore Near Paris - France |
28th Sep, 2010 at 10:01:28pm
Sturgeo, you have been quick !
Rusty by nature
On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:
They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!" |
||||||
![]() 6752 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
29th Sep, 2010 at 07:33:03am
=Paul S,28th Sep, 2010
EDIT: 8 degrees more advanced pushed up the whole curve, so is ignition that significant? ![]() definately, but that change in the graph looks far more like about 3 pounds more boost ,i know its unlikely , ,but is it possible there was any discrepency in the boost measurement ,base atmos pressure ref etc ? Edited by robert on 29th Sep, 2010. Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
| Home > Technical Chat > Torque/VE | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |



that does actually get a tiny bit richer .



