Page:
Home > Technical Chat > Torque/VE

Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Right,

I'm trying to get a flat torque curve on the next version of the 998Ti. If possible all the way up to 7500rpm.

This curve shows typical 1275 turbo torque characteristics:



(Thanks to legrandfromage for this)

What do we think is causing the torque to drop off so quick? I believe that they are all cammed for peak torque at higher revs.

Is it due to turbo back pressure, wrong cam, cylinder head? Or is it something else?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

poor boost control paul in mine..

have a look at my curve on 12 psi 167 bhp...the boost was much more stable.

pop up the boost curves as well ..in fact the sot rating is a better rep of the real curve eff wise..

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Here is the corresponding boost curve:



I can see what you mean.

This is my torque curve. Despite being lower, it's pretty flat until the rev limiter comes in.



and the associated boost curve:



Curves courtesy of Robert.

I think that there is more to it than just boost control.

Edited by Paul S on 28th Sep, 2010.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

Could it be sorted fuelling? whether it be Fuel Injection or clever use of the choke?


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Could be. All the 1275s were getting richer as the revs went up.

But the drop in torque is so drastic. It you take Ron's torque as being representative of the bunch, torque drop from 175 to 100 with only a drop of 1350 to 1200 in MAP.

Fueling may account for some of it, but I think it is more to do with a drop in VE.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

heres my 12 psi run ,see how the torque curve follows the boost a bit ..




the torque drop off on engines where the boost stayed level , can be due to a multitude of factors .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Kean

User Avatar

2406 Posts
Member #: 341
aka T2clubby

South Staffs

Mine was dropping off due to turbine back pressure.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 28th Sep, 2010 t2clubby said:
Mine was dropping off due to turbine back pressure.


Was this your hybrid?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

better one




i think mine was getting leaner wasnt it ?

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I think the TT is looking pretty flat, the only reason it suddenly falls away is the rev limiter. Holds boost too.

Maybe a 266 would help a bit towards the limit as the MG cam has reached its peak.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Is this the correct lambda curve?



Looks pretty flat to me.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus


On 28th Sep, 2010 Paul S said:
Right,

I'm trying to get a flat torque curve on the next version of the 998Ti. If possible all the way up to 7500rpm.


unlikely to get a flat curve all the way from say 2000 to 7500 paul .if you do well youll get a flatish band of 4000rpm .. ...the greater the sophistication the wider the band .

so
doing..
really well youll have 3500 to 7500rpm power band
averagely youll get 4500 to 7500rpm power band
poorly youll get 5000 to 7500rpm power band .

im imagining a torque curve were every value is within 20% of max trq in this band .

Edited by robert on 28th Sep, 2010.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 28th Sep, 2010 Paul S said:
Is this the correct lambda curve?



Looks pretty flat to me.


ahh yes i was wrong i was thinking of the higher boosts i think *oh well*that does actually get a tiny bit richer .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 28th Sep, 2010 robert said:
unlikely to get a flat curve all the way from say 2000 to 7500 paul .if you do well youll get a flatish band of 4000rpm .. ...the greater the sophistication the wider the band .

so
doing..
really well youll have 3500 to 7500rpm power band
averagely youll get 4500 to 7500rpm power band
poorly youll get 5000 to 7500rpm power band .

im imagining a torque curve were every value is within 20% of max trq in this band .


I've currently got a flat curve from 4k to 6k ish. That's within about 95% max torque.

I would be happy with 4.5k to 7.5k. That's a 50% increase in useable rev range.

Just trying to get my head around the reason why so many suffer from this huge drop in torque past around 4-5k.

I'm pretty sure it is a VE issue related to the head and cam rather than the turbo selection. We have a a full range of T2, T3 and Gt17 in the above and they all suffer the same traits.

Maybe, it's a fact of life with turbos, but it would be good to find a way around it.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Its almost like the dynamics of the turbo need to change throughout the rev range.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

yes but ... you can have a stonking big valve head , ideal cam to suit ,then run a r5 t2 and have it all nose dive at 5 k ,the turbo can definately do it in ,just as well as anything else .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Advantage

User Avatar

1137 Posts
Member #: 1450
Post Whore

Near Paris - France

Naive solution :
modulate boost à la Metro turbo to get you flat curve ?

like 12psi setting up to 4,5K, then 15 up to 5,5 and so on.

But maybe you will have trouble finding a turbo that boosts early and can get up to very high boost

Edited by Advantage on 28th Sep, 2010.

Rusty by nature

On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:

They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!"


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

i think the trq graph is a bit misleading ,ill make a zero scale one ..

here we go ..


Edited by robert on 28th Sep, 2010.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


sturgeo

857 Posts
Member #: 1778
Post Whore

Northants

On 28th Sep, 2010 Advantage said:

So if you don't want your torque to drop, let your boost go up *happy*


Hmm, bit of a hijack but I like the sound of that, would it work?
With ebc you could increase the boost under certain loads, therefore not increasing torque (aka kill std gearbox) but just keeping the level up to get the flatish curve all the way to the red line...


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

a flat boost control limit will still show the characteristic curve of the cam, so increase/ decrease boost to flatten out the torque curve.

3d boost control is helpful

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus




On 28th Sep, 2010 Sprocket said:
a flat boost control limit will still show the characteristic curve of the cam



not necessarily...
eg
if the head wont flow enough ,the cam cant show its true colours ..

or if the inlet or ex are a restriction

if the valve springs are too soft ,

or the ignition weak

if the fuel is wrong or timing out

all these things can completely mask a good cam ,and make it appear mediocre.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Star Mag

User Avatar

1745 Posts
Member #: 375
Post Whore

Leicestershire

My engine on that day was running rich through the whole range as it was low on boost due to a pikey boost control!

My engine also had a standard head only fettled to lower the compression.

Ron


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

On 28th Sep, 2010 sturgeo said:
On 28th Sep, 2010 Advantage said:

So if you don't want your torque to drop, let your boost go up *happy*


Hmm, bit of a hijack but I like the sound of that, would it work?
With ebc you could increase the boost under certain loads, therefore not increasing torque (aka kill std gearbox) but just keeping the level up to get the flatish curve all the way to the red line...


The point of this thread is to understand the reason for the drop in torque rather than develope a fudge around it.

As robert says, there could be any number of reasons for it, but given that most of us suffer from it, it should be possible to identify the cause.

EDIT: 8 degrees more advanced pushed up the whole curve, so is ignition that significant?

Edited by Paul S on 28th Sep, 2010.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Advantage

User Avatar

1137 Posts
Member #: 1450
Post Whore

Near Paris - France

Sturgeo, you have been quick !

I edited this because I thought I was being pedantic !

Rusty by nature

On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:

They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!"


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

=Paul S,28th Sep, 2010


EDIT: 8 degrees more advanced pushed up the whole curve, so is ignition that significant?



definately, but that change in the graph looks far more like about 3 pounds more boost ,i know its unlikely , ,but is it possible there was any discrepency in the boost measurement ,base atmos pressure ref etc ?

Edited by robert on 29th Sep, 2010.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM

Home > Technical Chat > Torque/VE
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: