Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > General Chat > building a turbo 1220

1961minipickup

4 Posts
Member #: 9129
Junior Member

Hi i needhelp sorting my engine build. i was wondering if anyone has built one of these before. using a 1098 crank and sunbeam imp pistons. In vizards book it tells me to machine 150 thousandths off the top of the block that got me thinking if i use my 12g202 ported and enlarged to 12g295 chamber size can i machine a little less off the block to lower the compression and run a gt1752 turbo. so some questions is the gt1752 the right turbo? will the pistons hold up? with that many cc's will the 12g295 flow enough or should i pocket the block and go 12g2940. as far as power ouput that i would like to get anthing over 120 thanks for your help


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

That seems like an awful lot of work to get a few extra CC. You can get the same amount of additional torque with a couple of pounds extra boost and a more reliable engine.

Not sure if you can actually get Imp pistons anymore. If you can, then they are likely to be expensive and unproven under boost.

You can easily get 120hp from a 998 Turbo and with a bit more effort, 150-160 is possible.

It is generally considered bad practise to use the bore to enlarge the combustion chamber. It has been done and it does work, but I thnk that you are better off getting the head opened.

The 202 may be a little restrictive without a lot of work. My 998 gets 120hp on a standard 12G295, so that would be my preference.

A T2 may be better than a GT1752 for 120hp, but you will soon want more power, so I suggest that you start with the GT1752.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I agree, all that work, for something a little smaller than a 1275. Better to use a 1275, parts are more available and proven.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Mr Joshua

2496 Posts
Member #: 1954
Post Whore

Luton Bedfordshire

Many on here have tried to reinvent the wheel and have seen the light and gone with what has been proven. A lot of unknowns in what you have presented by no means a bad idea just a path never taken go 1275 my friend.

Own the day


Advantage

User Avatar

1137 Posts
Member #: 1450
Post Whore

Near Paris - France

Or a +60 1098 with Oz pistons if they are still cheap ?

I don't know if you are aware but engines are going back to the roots.
The 1,2 VW they just released (I red about recently) is long stroke, tub shaped head, two parralel valves per cylinder and turbo !

Rusty by nature

On 23rd Jun, 2008 paul wiginton said:

They said "That sounds rough mate." I said "Cheers it cost me a fortune to make it sound like that!"


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

I've built a turbo 1132 with OZ pistons. That'd be much simpler.

Imp Pistons are EASY to aquire though.

http://www.hillmanimpspecialists.com/pricelist2.htm

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.


Home > General Chat > building a turbo 1220
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: