Page:
Home > Technical Chat > GT2554R Turbo - Map Opinions

01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Hi all,

This turbo looks like it might be ok me?

Any comments as im not too hot on maps

Chris


Attachments:


cossierick

User Avatar

3074 Posts
Member #: 1348
Post Whore

wakefield West Yorks

I think it would be brilliant on a big bore 16v motor, but 5port its too big in my eyes.
Nice though rollerbearing turbo and about £750 brand new i dont think is bad.

Rick


quinton

User Avatar

338 Posts
Member #: 1911
Senior Member

Swindon

998 16v I think might be to big for you.




http://photobucket.com/quintonrose


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

If this is for the 970 K head engine, then it is a little on the large side.

Peak power would be OK, but not as good as a GT17 or GT20 because of the poor efficiency.

Also it has a 0.64 A/R turbine that would take a lot of flow to spool it up to full boost. The roller bearing core may offset that a bit.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

Look at a GT2259

Will flow enough for your 200bhp target. You wont have to go stupidly high on the revs to achieve it either. 9000rpm should be sufficient.

Between 14-17 Psi should get you somewhere near your target.

If you feel the need for more power wind the boost up to 22-24psi.

250bhp should be attainable from the calculations using some "estimated" numbers. But what happens in a real world situation of course may be significantly different.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Yer for the 970 K motor.

Just like the fact it was roller bearing and water-cooled.

I think im still leaning towards the GT20.

I will be running antilag, so should be ok to spool up? Does that change your thoughts on this one paul?

Chris


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

A 2056 in your application will spool from around. 3250rpm with full boost attained from 4000rpm. Looking at about 18-19psi.

250 is attainable with that turbo. But you will need to stop is spooling till around 4000rpm.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

Comparing the plots on the maps for the 2056 and the 2259.

I think you could let the 2259 spool from a little earlier. But the 2056 is better for higher pressure ratios.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 5th Nov, 2010 Sam said:
A 2056 in your application will spool from around. 3250rpm with full boost attained from 4000rpm.


How did you work that out?

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Carl S
Forum Mod

User Avatar

1927 Posts
Member #: 1761
Stalker

Bristol




On 5th Nov, 2010 01smartc said:
I will be running antilag, so should be ok to spool up?


Just an FYI on anti-lag: anti-lag only helps to stop the turbo de-spooling between gear changes, it does not speed up initial spool times.

I belive it is also quite harsh on the turbine, so I would have thought a 360 degree bearing is a must.


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

25 centre on a 2056 or a 2259 would be emence if you could do it.

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Initial spool time will be irrelivent as I can build boost on the line and use the launch control.

Then the antilag will keep the boost up between gear changes and round corners :)

I do a total of about 50 miles racing thw whole year so not going to worry about turbine :)

Chris


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

How are you going to build boost on the line? You need load to make boost. You don't get that standing still.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

launch control with als.


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

How does launch control make load?

Sit and rev a turbo charged engine in neutral. see how much boost you make. none. The engine needs load.

The only way we found to make boost when we first put the engine in the van was to sit it on axle stands, drop it in 4th then build up the rev's. Then you keep the rev's on and dab the brakes creating load and as a biproduct boost.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

All this anti lag etc is no substitute for picking an appropriate turbo in the first place. The 2554 is too large in my opinion.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 5th Nov, 2010 apbellamy said:
How does launch control make load?

Sit and rev a turbo charged engine in neutral. see how much boost you make. none. The engine needs load.

The only way we found to make boost when we first put the engine in the van was to sit it on axle stands, drop it in 4th then build up the rev's. Then you keep the rev's on and dab the brakes creating load and as a biproduct boost.


You can do it this way, but will just produce wheelspin or a broken gearbox in my opinion.

http://www.rallycars.com/Cars/bangbang.html

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Thanks Tom, thats what I wanted to know really.

So i'm back to the GT20 then?

apbellamy? - How do rally cars build boost on the line?


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

I've never built a rally car so I can't comment.

Reading the link above, it only mentions gear change though not setting off. You still need load to make boost and you can't do that with the car staitionary.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

Actually Andy you can to a degree by holding the car back on the brakes and slipping the clutch to load the engine and build some boost. I used to do this to good effect in my old 306 diesel turbo for emergency starts off the traffic lights. However its harsh on the clutch and also loads the transmission right up by the engine making a lot of torque from low revs.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Going off topic here, but the MS3 has a feature that allows you to add extra fuel whilst retarding the ignition with launch control. This spools up the turbo and creates boost without load :)

http://www.msextra.com/doc/ms3/launch.html

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

Paul, thats exactly what I will be using.

But via DTA ecu.


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9407 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales




On 5th Nov, 2010 Paul S said:
Going off topic here, but the MS3 has a feature that allows you to add extra fuel whilst retarding the ignition with launch control. This spools up the turbo and creates boost without load :)

http://www.msextra.com/doc/ms3/launch.html



the emerald k6 ecu also does this.

Chris, why the need to go water cooled?

Team Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


01smartc

400 Posts
Member #: 2563
Senior Member

Tamworth

I dont really, was more the ball bearing... but water cooled can only help :)


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

Jimbo's turbo seems to work well and I believe his is a ball bearing core with a striking resemblence to the GT2056

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.

Home > Technical Chat > GT2554R Turbo - Map Opinions
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: