Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > General Chat > Mini exhausts

gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester

Why are they so loud?

Everything apart from the pea shooter is very loud and boomy, is this nessasary for the power they produce?
I was thinking there might be merit in the miglia style of setup with a twin rear scilencer?

I mean dont get me wrong I like a good exhaust note but at certain speeds they seem too noisy? What does everyone else think?

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


jamie@thefatgarage

User Avatar

665 Posts
Member #: 9345
Post Whore

Sheffield

I don't think they are that loud, just the car has bad soundproofing. Plus, drivers ear to end of exhaust is shorter than most other cars!


Sam

1391 Posts
Member #: 1686
Post Whore

Oxford

Bad sound proofing, thin panels. Space constraints for decent silencers.

On 19th Feb, 2011 Miniwilliams said:
OMG Robert that's a big one


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

mine doesnt seem that loud, although its a single box rc40, i rarely hear it over the engine noise unless both my windows are open

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


carts60

User Avatar

259 Posts
Member #: 9335
Senior Member

Bromley, SE London

I think poor sound proofing is a large cause of the boom and reverberation you get in the cabin.

I do agree though, a lot of the mini exhausts are not performance oriented, so are larger than necessary, creating excessive noise.

Noise can be reduced by more baffle boxes or more soundproofing. Extra weight either way, but i'd go with a twin box maniflow if it was my choice


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

The fact the silencer is straight through is the culpret for most of the noise.

Me personally when I'm done will have the turbo, a sports cat, a mid section and the rear box, all in 2 1/4" Will be interesting to see how loud that is at full bore.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester

Colin so you recon the side exits don't reach the same db's. Thinking about it modern systems have loads of bends.

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


Johnny

User Avatar

1183 Posts
Member #: 6926
Post Whore

Accrington

i used the same exhaust silencer i have on the turbo now on a 998 i once had (bike can) and i could hardly hear it. and thats all i had. plus there are no bends in it at all. but its quiet, produces a very nice sound, and seems to give me great power output.

60bhp stage 2 kit 998 N/A
133lbps / 140bhp 9psi (moderate mods)


Si P

784 Posts
Member #: 912
Post Whore

North Yorkshire

Why would you choose to run a cat Colin..?

Question being after reading Dave Walkers column in this months Track Driver Mag. He claims that they are the work of the devil..

So hence the question..?

Si


On 30th May, 2011 Sprocket said:
The fact the silencer is straight through is the culpret for most of the noise.

Me personally when I'm done will have the turbo, a sports cat, a mid section and the rear box, all in 2 1/4" Will be interesting to see how loud that is at full bore.

I drill holes in everything..!


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 30th May, 2011 Si P said:
Why would you choose to run a cat Colin..?

Question being after reading Dave Walkers column in this months Track Driver Mag. He claims that they are the work of the devil..

So hence the question..?

Si



Since you don't really know the context in which Dave meant his comment, it is easy to make assumptions.

Consider that BTTC and WRC all have to have a cat fitted, and while yes, they might release an amount more power, I don't see them being 'The devils work'. Its vehicle construction and use legislation.

One thing I recon Walker might be spouting off about is the that his tailpipe lambda readings will be all to cock.

I don't agree with those who remove a cat from a car that should have one, and then find a 'friendly' MOT man. Its not the MOT man these people should worry about, its the VOSA man. Fit a quality sports cat (£200+), not a £60 ebay special.

My car should have a cat, so a cat will go back on. Simples

You live your life by values. For me, if refitting the cat means I'm doing a little bit for the better, however minute it may be, I'll be happy knowing that its right*happy*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


wez

1226 Posts
Member #: 9271
Post Whore

Stoke on Trent

1 3/4 RC40's are'nt loud but at what sort of power output do they become restrictive?

one day boost will be mine!

On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each...


eden7842

User Avatar

1755 Posts
Member #: 8852
Post Whore

leicestershire

i have no silencer just 2" straight through and its not that loud, the sccr box is much louder

13.95 1/4 mile on a 2.95 fd. Carnt be that hard to beat!


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

Call me daft, but imo a 1.75" rc40 will do for any N/A application, because thats pretty much all that goes into the engine, so the exhaust should be capable of taking it away. I can see why a 2" bore is suggested for turbo use though.

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


theoneeyedlizard

User Avatar

7265 Posts
Member #: 1268
The Boom Boom speaker Police!

Essex

Fit a rotary muffler :)

In the 13's at last!.. Just


Si P

784 Posts
Member #: 912
Post Whore

North Yorkshire

Sorry if the question sounded out of sorts. Just an honest question.

Dealing with the DVLA resonantly about vehicle taxation and emissions I was informed that they relate to engine year of production, not chassis year of manufacture.

My car does not have to run one and the taxation class will not change also. This is what the DVLA are after in the first place money.

Walker was referring to actual making them work, and finding that they are very hard things to make work as intended or infact at all.

Never mind the costs of production and harm it does to the environment in production.

They end up doing more harm than good, having to get them up to temperature in a short space of time, Running the engine rich at start up and then keeping it at the correct core temp. Ends up burning more fuel in the first place.

Anyway these are the ramblings of a night worker. So this was my interest in you fitting one to your motor and making it work.

Re: - Mini exhausts I rang a exhaust manufacture direct told them all about the engine spec and car application, and he made one to suit.

And Yep its works very well.

Correct db for competition / road use and produces the right figures on the rollers to.

Si


On 31st May, 2011 Sprocket said:



On 30th May, 2011 Si P said:
Why would you choose to run a cat Colin..?

Question being after reading Dave Walkers column in this months Track Driver Mag. He claims that they are the work of the devil..

So hence the question..?

Si



Since you don't really know the context in which Dave meant his comment, it is easy to make assumptions.

Consider that BTTC and WRC all have to have a cat fitted, and while yes, they might release an amount more power, I don't see them being 'The devils work'. Its vehicle construction and use legislation.

One thing I recon Walker might be spouting off about is the that his tailpipe lambda readings will be all to cock.

I don't agree with those who remove a cat from a car that should have one, and then find a 'friendly' MOT man. Its not the MOT man these people should worry about, its the VOSA man. Fit a quality sports cat (£200+), not a £60 ebay special.

My car should have a cat, so a cat will go back on. Simples

You live your life by values. For me, if refitting the cat means I'm doing a little bit for the better, however minute it may be, I'll be happy knowing that its right*happy*

Edited by Si P on 1st Jun, 2011.

I drill holes in everything..!


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

You are all missing quite an important fact here.

Pea-shooters are quiet as they are restrictive, and cars with them fitted have low power, and low revs, meaning less exhaust gasses and a quieter drive.

Once you start modifing to get more power, you are expecting any scilence to do more work (bigger bang, more nosie). I would think that sound proofing on the boot floor would be a good start, the only other way is to fit a bigger scilencer, not easy in the space available, but you could be imaginative!

On the subject of Cats, there is no point fitting one IMO. You're never going to save the world fitting one to a car you hardly use. And when you come to sort the fuelling, it'll always be a compronise between power and not destroying the Cat.


On 30th May, 2011 gr4h4m said:
Why are they so loud?

Everything apart from the pea shooter is very loud and boomy, is this nessasary for the power they produce?
I was thinking there might be merit in the miglia style of setup with a twin rear scilencer?

I mean dont get me wrong I like a good exhaust note but at certain speeds they seem too noisy? What does everyone else think?

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 1st Jun, 2011 wil_h said:


On the subject of Cats, there is no point fitting one IMO. You're never going to save the world fitting one to a car you hardly use. And when you come to sort the fuelling, it'll always be a compronise between power and not destroying the Cat.



Ok. I'm not after saving the world since the world does not need saving! This planet will be here long after we are gone*wink*

I don't see how you could destroy a cat, fueling for power, since it is pig rich that kills the cat. the cat will cope well with a max torque fueling of 12.5:1.

If you don't want to fit a cat to your car, thats up to you. If your car does not have a requirement for a cat, there's no problem. And yes they get out clause for the later minis lies with the engine number. But, if you have a car that has had a computerised MOT emissions test done on the cat test, you try and get the monkey operating the machine to tell it that it needs to do a Basic emissions test. Not impossible, but for a monkey, it might as well be.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York


I totally agree with the second statement. But my understanding was that 12.5:1 would quickly destroy a Cat and you need to be closer to sticcho to ensure it worked.

On 1st Jun, 2011 Sprocket said:



I don't see how you could destroy a cat, fueling for power, since it is pig rich that kills the cat. the cat will cope well with a max torque fueling of 12.5:1.

If you don't want to fit a cat to your car, thats up to you. If your car does not have a requirement for a cat, there's no problem. And yes they get out clause for the later minis lies with the engine number. But, if you have a car that has had a computerised MOT emissions test done on the cat test, you try and get the monkey operating the machine to tell it that it needs to do a Basic emissions test. Not impossible, but for a monkey, it might as well be.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Flame Red

288 Posts
Member #: 6267
Senior Member

Bristol

I have a single DTM silencer on my car, the rest of the system is 2". It was really loud when the car was NA but I thought it sounded fantastic. I did twice get asked when I was going to get my car fixed by people at work, I guess a cammy engine with a loud exhaust sounds broken to some people! The other issue with it was that it would set car alarms off, including the same Transit on my road everyday. I was also told by one of my neighbours that they didn't need an alarm as they got woken up at 7:20 everyday by my car.

Once I fitted the turbo engine I was quite disappointed how quiet it was and also that it's lost the rasp it used to have. I might consider running no silencer.

On the subject of cats, I also dislike them. I have removed them on all but one of my cars, I tried to get my 91 built but 92 registered Audi through an MOT without them but the tester wouldn't pass it. I spoke to VOSA and they confirmed that if the engine was built in 91 (which I had a letter to prove) they should pass it. I ended up getting a cat fitted which was very expensive but the tester is a good friend of my friend's dad and he really wasn't happy with it so I gave in.


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

And what car do you know runs under load at 14.7:1AFR?

The cat is happy with 13.2:1 to 12.5:1 (peak torque) fueling under load. Thats not to say it is efficient at that.

The hydrocarbon content really fucks them up

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York


Stop using logic, you make me look like a dick!

On 1st Jun, 2011 Sprocket said:
And what car do you know runs under load at 14.7:1AFR?

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester


Wil that understand the concept, I'm just not convinced that they need to be that loud to make the power your average tuned mini does. Just a debate, I presumed that the double rear mig style silencer would greatly reduce the noise however I bet the silencer design also has a lot to do with it, output pipe size, constructions etc.


On 1st Jun, 2011 wil_h said:
You are all missing quite an important fact here.

Pea-shooters are quiet as they are restrictive, and cars with them fitted have low power, and low revs, meaning less exhaust gasses and a quieter drive.

Once you start modifing to get more power, you are expecting any scilence to do more work (bigger bang, more nosie). I would think that sound proofing on the boot floor would be a good start, the only other way is to fit a bigger scilencer, not easy in the space available, but you could be imaginative!

On the subject of Cats, there is no point fitting one IMO. You're never going to save the world fitting one to a car you hardly use. And when you come to sort the fuelling, it'll always be a compronise between power and not destroying the Cat.


On 30th May, 2011 gr4h4m said:
Why are they so loud?

Everything apart from the pea shooter is very loud and boomy, is this nessasary for the power they produce?
I was thinking there might be merit in the miglia style of setup with a twin rear scilencer?

I mean dont get me wrong I like a good exhaust note but at certain speeds they seem too noisy? What does everyone else think?

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I guess it all boils down to the fact that if Maniflow sold quiet exhausts, they wouldn't sell any exhausts; if you see what I mean.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester

Mm see what you mean, so too many chavs buy minis :)

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

I think Wil is spot on, demand drives the product.

However in defence of Maniflow (who make decent quality stuff IMO) I am sure that if you rang up and asked them to make you a quieter but still free flowing system, they could.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂

Home > General Chat > Mini exhausts
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: