| Page: |
| Home > Technical Chat > GT17 A/R | |||||||
|
108 Posts Member #: 9182 Advanced Member |
1st Nov, 2011 at 06:33:19pm
Currently running a standard Metro Turbo setup but looking at building a second fast road car based on a mirage manifold with a GT17 and a Avonbab Ph2 cam. The turbo of choice seems to be the Saab GT1752 with an A/R of 0.47 but I have seen other GT 17 with A/R ranging from .40 to .56 .What is the optinumn A/R for any engine and how far should you variey up or down from it. I know its a general question with many engine variations but did somebody just find the Saab turbo by luck or by calculation. |
||||||
|
108 Posts Member #: 9182 Advanced Member |
20th Nov, 2011 at 12:17:58pm
Is there something wrong with the question or is this an unexplored area.Doing a search the only comparison I can find is were people have had T3 reconditioned from standard .25 to .36 and found it better .More info the range of A/R usable opens the door to using some diesal turbos which I'm finding easier to source secondhand at lower prices. |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
20th Nov, 2011 at 01:00:14pm
Changing turbine A/R is largely unexplored. The proven theory is that a lower A/R will reduce the boost threshold but may limit top end power and vice versa.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 861 Posts Member #: 951 Post Whore Bromsgrove |
21st Nov, 2011 at 09:20:41am
I have a GT1752 on a Matty manifold and 1.5 rockers.I found the max torque speed around 5000rpm with a 276 cam.Fitting the ph2 turbo cam brought this down to 4000 rpm AND mysteriously seemed to give more top end power. 'Where does the engine go?' |
||||||
| Home > Technical Chat > GT17 A/R | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |

