Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > Technical Chat > turbine paper

Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Bit of bed time reading for Paul S lol

I found chaper 8.3 interesting.


http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=t...NjpSoeQ&cad=rja

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



TurboTom

248 Posts
Member #: 7936
Senior Member

DK-8450 Hammel. Denmark

How did you come across this. ?

You must have to much spare time *smiley*

looks interresting

If i have more toys than you when i die, I WIN


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Thanks Joe.

Take me the whole holiday to get through that. Just skimmed it so far, but it looks very interesting.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Figure 3.1 is a compressor map for a turbo used on 2 litre Saab engine.

I wonder........

EDIT: Thought it might be the GT1752, but a couple of pages further on, there is reference to the TD04HL. Only found after spending some time trying to correlate the compressor map with my estimate of the Gt17 :$

Edited by Paul S on 23rd Dec, 2011.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

hmmm is that saying its a 202 bhp engine ? dont know what saab engine that is .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

My best guess would be the B204R, 150kW and fitted with the TD04:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_H_engine


EDIT: just got as far as Fig 3.20 that shows 1 Bar boost, so very likley to be the B204R.

Edited by Paul S on 23rd Dec, 2011.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

transient bit at the end is good ...

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


evolotion

User Avatar

2909 Posts
Member #: 83
Post Whore

Glasgow, Scotland

why o why did they use a retarded-big log manifold. thats not a valid comparison, atleast not for our interests. :(

turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)

Denis O'Brien.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Well, I think that it is all really about transients, specifically the boost threshold and accurate simulation.

I'm on page 120 so a bit to go yet.

He uses some strange methods though to calibrate his off-boost simluations. As I have found, the most difficult element to simulate is the turbine. He uses a turbine efficiency fudge factor at each engine speed to match up the measured and simulated outputs.

I approached this in a different manner. I found that the Gt2056 was spooling up quicker than expected (based on dyno results for a 1293 with that turbine) which told me that I had undersized the turbine, so I factored the flow data for the turbine until it looked about right. The problem is that Garrett publish very limited data for the turbine, just a pressure ratio-mass flow curve that is devoid of speed info.

When I later started playing silly-buggers with the simulation to just see what would happen with silly boost figures, I could not get the power past the maximum specified by Garrett for the turbo because the engine was being stuffed by high back pressure. As soon as I tried a GT28, the power spiralled. Hence I have some confidence from a single mass-flow scale factor rather than multiple efficiency factors.

Furthermore, the data would have come from the manufacturers test of the turbine, where they would have derived the efficiency from actual measurements of flow, pressure ratio and power output. He states quite early on in the thesis that the most difficult parameter to measure is flow. So why did he take their data as verbatim and fiddle the efficiency? I might work that out yet, but it puzzles me today.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Just got to the end.

Most informative technocal paper on turbocharging that I've ever read. Although it concentrates on transients and improving torque below 2000rpm, it discusses in detail all the major factors of turbine performance.

The last chapter is good because they put things into practise, although leave out some of the specific details.

He does fully endorsed tuned inlet and exhaust runner lengths for turbocharged engines and backs it up with real results :)

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Ive still only glanced through it, but I found it interesting that the shorter 4into1 came out better than the 4-2-1, I had two thought on this, 1 the pulses could be stronger with the 4-1, and 2 the shorter manifold could be giving up less heat and therefore energy.



On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 24th Dec, 2011 Joe C said:
Ive still only glanced through it, but I found it interesting that the shorter 4into1 came out better than the 4-2-1, I had two thought on this, 1 the pulses could be stronger with the 4-1, and 2 the shorter manifold could be giving up less heat and therefore energy.


Yes that was interesting, although I think you'll find that M1 was a short 4-2-1, but he only tested/simulated it below 2000rpm. He tries longer manifolds later on in the final chapter.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."

Home > Technical Chat > turbine paper
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: