Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > General Chat > Dv interesting

gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester

If not because there are some tm members and if you keep looking fast Carl's cams *wink*

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.a...mt=100mph&mid=0

Edited by gr4h4m on 16th Jan, 2012.

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


rubicon

User Avatar

3756 Posts
Member #: 1709
I like granny porn.

LONDONSHIRE

Vizards daughter......:)

On 2nd Oct, 2009 Vegard said:


On 1st Oct, 2009 Jimster said:
I bet my first wank came quicker than your first mini turbo


These new modern turbos with their quick spool up time, would make the competition harder.


On 15th Aug, 2011 robert said:
phew!!! thank you brett for smashing in my back doors .( not something i imagined writing... EVER)


mw3

User Avatar

684 Posts
Member #: 9590
Post Whore

Derby

Quite an interesting read! I'd like to know what sort of spec DV daughters car was running. 135bhp @ the wheels 6400 rpm was it?
I'm still sceptical myself as to these big power 5 port n/a engines.

Matt W




On 14th Mar, 2012 mw3 said:
Got a nice big delivery from Carl at Force Racing today.


stevieturbo

3594 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland




On 16th Jan, 2012 mw3 said:
Quite an interesting read! I'd like to know what sort of spec DV daughters car was running. 135bhp @ the wheels 6400 rpm was it?
I'm still sceptical myself as to these big power 5 port n/a engines.


But he does clearly say to ignore the power numbers. The on track performance is what counts as real evidence.

I'd imagine if you did follow the yellow book to a tee, then you could produce some great results DIY. Having the patience and skill to do the head porting would be difficult. As would finding the right people to cut any valve seats etc

A couple of good threads emerged here, although not Mini related.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.a...e+valve+jobs%3F

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.a...city+Dyno+Tests

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


Jimster
Site Admin

User Avatar

9407 Posts
Member #: 58
455bhp per ton
12 sec 1/4 mile road legal mini

Sunny Bridgend, South Wales

small world, the spotty 18 year old is one of the guys who builds out miglia engines, has been building superbike engines for years, but still does A series for us. Very clever guy

Team Racing

On 15th May, 2009 TurboDave said:

I think the welsh one has it right!


1st to provide running proof
of turbo twinkie in a car and first to
run a 1/4 in one!!

Is your data backed up?? one extra month free for all Turbo minis members, PM me for detials


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

Reading DVs response, he is a guilty as anyone of telling a good story. There is little evidence of his claims that he beat lots of cars that should have been faster. I know I like to say I beat lots of 1275 turbos with my 998, but there's lots of reasons why.

As we always say on TM, show us the ticket!

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Miniwilliams

User Avatar

5329 Posts
Member #: 140
Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place

nice post

Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on a carb?
First 5 port miniturbo to make over 200 bhp on Injection?

http://www.mattwoodsphotography.com


stevieturbo

3594 Posts
Member #: 655
Post Whore

Northern Ireland




On 17th Jan, 2012 wil_h said:
Reading DVs response, he is a guilty as anyone of telling a good story. There is little evidence of his claims that he beat lots of cars that should have been faster. I know I like to say I beat lots of 1275 turbos with my 998, but there's lots of reasons why.

As we always say on TM, show us the ticket!


Given the length of time he has been involved with engines and his reputation. Why would you disbelieve him ?
And why would he have a time slip from maybe 30 years ago from his daughter ?

I dont think there is any doubt about his credentials, or indeed what he has shared with the tuning world via books and other media.

And just because people went faster 10, 20, or 30+ years ago that you didnt hear of, doesnt mean it didnt happen. They just didnt post on the internet at the time that they did it *wink*

9.85 @ 145mph
202mph standing mile
speed didn't kill me, but taxation probably will


t@z

User Avatar

2054 Posts
Member #: 452
Post Whore

Chester, UK

was there even internet 20-30 years ago.....

nice read though. although i dont really have the knowledge to disbelieve or add anything to his story it is very well written. almost like a book action moment :)

Edited by t@z on 17th Jan, 2012.

www.twitter.com/lilpinkiy


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

It is a good read, I think the comments about not much improvement since are justified really given the time frame, although there has definitely been a jump in the last few years, I can remember JF winning Avon Park with a 13.2, then running a 13.048 on slicks, only a few years ago.
Then the TM massive have carried on pushing, with some great results from Nic on the 5 port head, and of course the DON, 11.12 sec 1/4 mile and counting.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I'm not saying that the story has no truth, and he clearly built some decent engines back in the day. And 5-ports heads are the same as they have ever been, so they will have been as fast in the '80s as they are now.

But come on, it's a pub story with all the best bits. And I'm sure there's a few bits of useful info missing.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


shellspeed

User Avatar

580 Posts
Member #: 9580
Post Whore

Surrey

There is a nice saying used in drag racing. "When the lights drop, the bullshit stops"


mw3

User Avatar

684 Posts
Member #: 9590
Post Whore

Derby

Ill have to see it to believe it.

Matt W




On 14th Mar, 2012 mw3 said:
Got a nice big delivery from Carl at Force Racing today.


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

On 17th Jan, 2012 Jimster said:
aaahh nic with a 5 port, the good old years


Nic still has "A" 5 port. *wink*

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


matty

User Avatar

8297 Posts
Member #: 408
Turbo Love Palace Fool

Aylesbury

We all know how difficult it is to even knock 0.1 of a second off our times or add 1mph to our terminals. When you consider that you basically have to run a 12sec quarter mile to stand a chance of a trophy at Avon, where as a few years back anything in the 13's you'd be in with a chance, to me that really does show how far things have progressed!

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel

www.fusionfabs.co.uk



1/4mile in 13.2sec @ 111 terminal on 15psi


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

Was speaking to DV at the Autosport show and he said that using a turbo, you don't really need those 16 valves, 8 will do just fine.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York


He also said that he hadn't really played with turbos, so how does he know. I'd say from this forum alone it is obvious that the 16v motors make more power on less boost.

Or is that your point?

On 17th Jan, 2012 Sprocket said:
Was speaking to DV at the Autosport show and he said that using a turbo, you don't really need those 16 valves, 8 will do just fine.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


theoneeyedlizard

User Avatar

7265 Posts
Member #: 1268
The Boom Boom speaker Police!

Essex

That's a good read.

So.. Who's going to invite them onto TM? They're after some more technical folk to chat to.

In the 13's at last!.. Just


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 17th Jan, 2012 wil_h said:

He also said that he hadn't really played with turbos, so how does he know. I'd say from this forum alone it is obvious that the 16v motors make more power on less boost.

Or is that your point?

On 17th Jan, 2012 Sprocket said:
Was speaking to DV at the Autosport show and he said that using a turbo, you don't really need those 16 valves, 8 will do just fine.


maybe it was *happy*

What he explained was that the turbo doesn't know if there is one or two inlet valves, since there is more than atmospheric pressure pushing in, any benefit of the extra valve area is soon out weighed by the boost . He also talked about the loss os swirl with 2 inlets compared to just the one.

I'm sticking with all 16 valves, a log exhaust manifold and a compact log plenum, much to DV's disgust. Fact is, that should easily net 180hp on 15psi, if not more, so, like DV said earlier in the conversation, OEM manfacturers build engines to a power figure to suit the grade of vehicle in a sales driven market. Once that figure is achived, all development stops. It doesnt matter how much more that engine is capable of the target has been satisfied.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


jbelanger

1267 Posts
Member #: 831
Post Whore

Montreal, Canada

On 17th Jan, 2012 Sprocket said:
I'm sticking with all 16 valves, a log exhaust manifold and a compact log plenum...

What's the point in using a 16-valve head if you're going to choke it on both the intake and exhaust sides?

Jean

http://www.jbperf.com/


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

In my head, the reason the 16v heads are better is all down to the design of the head in our case, i very much doubt an a series 5 port head, with 16 valves (impossible i know) would create very little, if any, benefit over the 8v under boost. The a series head is a very old design, and average at best, which is where the modern more efficient head conversions come into play. I'd love to fit a better head than 5 port later on down the line, but the 5 port is good enough for me as im not planning to squeeze every last horsepower the a series is capable of producing. Until one day i wake up and decide that i do.

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I think DV is missing something then. a turbo engine will respond the same to head mods as an NA engine.

You can see this just by looking at the formula where VE has a direct effect on predicted power.

The compromise between packaging and optimisation is always a tough one. But if your packaging compromise will still achieve your target, then it's not really a compromise is it?

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


minimole23

4309 Posts
Member #: 1321
Post Whore

Wiltshire




On 18th Jan, 2012 jbelanger said:
On 17th Jan, 2012 Sprocket said:
I'm sticking with all 16 valves, a log exhaust manifold and a compact log plenum...

What's the point in using a 16-valve head if you're going to choke it on both the intake and exhaust sides?

Jean


My reason for going 16 valves is to have an engine with smooth bottom end running,with top end revs. Also for track use with things are held at full throttle for long periods of time better cooling. for a road engine i'd stick with the 5 port.

On 7th Oct, 2010 5haneJ said:
yeah I gave it all a good prodding


nafnaforiginal12

User Avatar

3 Posts
Member #: 9725
Junior Member

On the link a 5-speed box was mentioned, are these suitable for big power turbo engines because i thought the actual cogs were smaller to fit in 5-speeds so they are weaker?

Is that right?


Yo-Han

User Avatar

976 Posts
Member #: 3228
Post Whore

North of the Netherlands

Incidently, DV will be doing a seminar in Swansea Sept this year:
http://www.davidvizardseminars.com/ue-Swansea-1012.html

Quite expensive at 550 USD though.

Dazed and Confused....

Home > General Chat > Dv interesting
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: