Page: |
Home > Technical Chat > Lobe Separation Effects | |||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 03:59:57pm
Too cold to go out into the workshop, so have been playing with cams on the simulator.
Edited by Paul S on 11th Feb, 2012. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
11th Feb, 2012 at 04:31:33pm
looks like 112 is a good compromise for a non scatter, thats what I came up with too. On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 04:43:56pm
Yes, the MD274 has 112 degrees LSA and it falls just a bit short of the scatter cam that has 112 degrees LSA on the outers.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 05:17:42pm
Here's a comparison of the MD274 and the MG Metro cam:
Edited by Paul S on 11th Feb, 2012. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
11th Feb, 2012 at 05:58:29pm
soooo....
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 06:01:33pm
Ha ha, just thinking the same thing. Wanna make a prediction for a Ph2 on a 998? Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
4890 Posts Member #: 1775 Post Whore Chester |
11th Feb, 2012 at 06:09:45pm
Paul do you have the 266 mapped? I'm intrested as I think the 274 would be a big improvement on my 266. Both vmax and ben who makes my kit recommend 112 lca and a 274/5 I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
|
||||||
1226 Posts Member #: 9271 Post Whore Stoke on Trent |
11th Feb, 2012 at 06:10:28pm
as these graphs are plotted to your engine, is there any general rules that can be used from them across all 998 builds? one day boost will be mine!
On 10th Mar, 2012 Joe C said:
TBH peple stick it everywhere... and theres merits to each... |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 06:16:59pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 wez said:
as these graphs are plotted to your engine, is there any general rules that can be used from them across all 998 builds? Yes, manifolds make more difference than heads or cams :) Apart from that, it would appear that the best cams have around 260EX/250IN duration at clearance lift, highest lift possible and 112 degree LSA. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 06:18:36pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 gr4h4m said:
Paul do you have the 266 mapped? I'm intrested as I think the 274 would be a big improvement on my 266. Both vmax and ben who makes my kit recommend 112 lca and a 274/5 I don't have the data for a 266, but I would have to agree. I would like to run a simulation of a 266 at 112 LSA and 1.5 rockers. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
11th Feb, 2012 at 06:21:40pm
Ok I'll take a punt!
Edited by Joe C on 11th Feb, 2012. On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
1267 Posts Member #: 831 Post Whore Montreal, Canada |
11th Feb, 2012 at 06:36:24pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 Paul S said:
Yes, manifolds make more difference than heads or cams :) That's interesting because that goes against what seems to be the consensus here. Most seem to think that boost will take care of the manifold non-optimal design. Jean |
||||||
3574 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 07:14:24pm
On a boosted setup, inlet and exhaust manifold would need to be horrific to produce really bad results.
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 07:37:49pm
Well done Joe, even better than I expected:
Edited by Paul S on 11th Feb, 2012. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
11th Feb, 2012 at 08:24:50pm
Re13 would be interesting to see, but can you take into account its 50 thou timing. On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 08:40:33pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 Joe C said:
Re13 would be interesting to see, but can you take into account its 50 thou timing. Haven't you done a full plot? Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
11th Feb, 2012 at 08:53:16pm
yep,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
11th Feb, 2012 at 09:02:20pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 jbelanger said:
On 11th Feb, 2012 Paul S said:
Yes, manifolds make more difference than heads or cams :) That's interesting because that goes against what seems to be the consensus here. Most seem to think that boost will take care of the manifold non-optimal design. Jean And in the most part it does, but if you want more hp for less boost then optimisation is the way to go. lets face it, in the Mini, it's easy, cheap and compact to increase boost and get excellent results, but it's harder, more expensive and space consuming to optimise everything for the same results for less boost On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
11th Feb, 2012 at 09:03:29pm
Paul, have you considered the effects of retarding the inlet and advancing the exhaust timings? 115 inlet and 110 exhaust for example. On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
4620 Posts Member #: 20 My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture Lake District |
11th Feb, 2012 at 09:05:43pm
Out of intrest have you any simulations on the Phase 3 ? |
||||||
6743 Posts Member #: 828 Post Whore uranus |
11th Feb, 2012 at 09:53:50pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 stevieturbo said:
There's a lot of talk on camshafts over on PH at the minute, although it's more to do with intake centre line than LSA. http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.a...entreline+Angle just stuck my nonsense in there too...:) Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM |
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 09:59:43pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 Sprocket said:
lets face it, in the Mini, it's easy, cheap and compact to increase boost and get excellent results, but it's harder, more expensive and space consuming to optimise everything for the same results for less boost What if a set of cheap 5-Port manifolds achieved as high a VE as a 16v conversion with short inlet runners? EDIT: said "power" but meant VE. Edited by Paul S on 11th Feb, 2012. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 10:00:10pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 Turbo Phil said:
Out of intrest have you any simulations on the Phase 3 ? I've not got any data for a Ph3. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
11th Feb, 2012 at 10:02:12pm
On 11th Feb, 2012 Sprocket said:
Paul, have you considered the effects of retarding the inlet and advancing the exhaust timings? 115 inlet and 110 exhaust for example. Yes, but there are so many combinations. I've taken the approach of finding what works best on standard timings and then work from there. Inlet scatter, then exhaust scatter, then advance/retard. Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
8297 Posts Member #: 408 Turbo Love Palace Fool Aylesbury |
11th Feb, 2012 at 10:06:34pm
Haha...wha have you done Robert! I have visions of keyboards smoking with people typing out there replys. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Fusion-Fabri..._homepage_panel
|
||||||
Home > Technical Chat > Lobe Separation Effects | |||||||
|
Page: |