| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Questions on 7 port turbo usage. | |||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
17th Apr, 2013 at 11:31:51am
Just thinking about my build long term as I know the engine is going to be a long time until completion and just weighing up my options.
On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
![]() 882 Posts Member #: 9774 Post Whore Buckinghamshire |
17th Apr, 2013 at 11:44:10am
If you're going to go 7 port, I'd be looking at fuel injection rather than a HIF44. From the tiny amount of knowledge and reading I've done on the subject, having the 4 inlet ports makes it much easier to run and set up the FI. http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...tid=469104&fr=0 |
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
17th Apr, 2013 at 11:45:12am
If you are going to the bother of putting an extra two ports on your head then bin the carb. Injection is the only way. The SC head already has the injector bosses and fuel rail, so it's easy.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
17th Apr, 2013 at 12:14:04pm
Yeah I see what you mean Wil, Would i be better off binning the 1380 idea and going down to 1293 to aid with lowering the compression ratio?
On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
|
2096 Posts Member #: 1111 Post Whore s wales |
17th Apr, 2013 at 12:33:17pm
the work envolved/cost has always put me off. for my personal use a well modded 5 port setup is perfect, and is capable of giving more power than I will ever need. |
||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
17th Apr, 2013 at 12:37:10pm
I know what you mean Dan, but this is a car I plan on keeping for a very long time, so I don't mind waiting for the money to do stuff if it's something that I feel I would benefit from in the long term. I might find I put a 1275 back in to get the car on the road when everything else is done, then maybe finish building the 1380 5 port, then later on collect all the neccesary components for the 7 port and do that as a further project. That way I spread my cost around a bit and get to drive my car sooner rather than later :) On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
![]() 4634 Posts Member #: 20 My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture Lake District |
17th Apr, 2013 at 05:55:09pm
I managed to grind 26cc out of my SC 7 port head while still keeping the heart type shape chamber. Edited by Turbo Phil on 17th Apr, 2013. |
||||||
|
8215 Posts Member #: 90 Post Whore Somewhere around Swindon |
17th Apr, 2013 at 06:57:23pm
If your going 7 port spend a little extra and get the sc one it will save you time and expense later on Crystal Sound Audio said:
Why wolfie...you should have your name as Fuckfaceshithead ! "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."-Douglas Adams |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
17th Apr, 2013 at 07:08:50pm
the SC package with the ECU is good value IMO,
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 3673 Posts Member #: 9300 Post Whore Quarry Bonk |
17th Apr, 2013 at 07:15:29pm
There's a whole package on there which includes a plenum if you look under the complete package options :) On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!! 17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine) |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
17th Apr, 2013 at 07:21:59pm
even better! On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 1434 Posts Member #: 8466 Post Whore Mansfield |
17th Apr, 2013 at 08:15:15pm
On 17th Apr, 2013 Turbo Phil said:
I managed to grind 26cc out of my SC 7 port head while still keeping the heart type shape chamber. Phil, Are you sure I can't tempt you to open up my SC 7 port to 26cc. It's would save me buying new block and pistons. Specialist components will do 24cc, but really need 26cc for required 9.75-1Cr Class C 3rd Place Avon 2011 14.18 @101mph |
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Questions on 7 port turbo usage. | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |



)

