| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Compression Ratio | |||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Jun, 2005 at 02:54:29pm
Have any of you clever chaps determined how to calculate the optimum compression ratio yet? Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
|
Site Admin ![]() 15302 Posts Member #: 337 Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner & TM legend. |
28th Jun, 2005 at 03:17:16pm
Theoretically, 5.5:1 would probably be closer to the optimum to allow ignition advance to give best power. However, as always, it is a trade off to give some sembalance of performance off-boost. With a 5.5:1 compression ratio, I would guess you would even possibly be into problems getting the engine to fire up, and off-boost performance would be very poor. I've always made an educated guess as a compression ratio to aim for, based on other engines people have built in the past etc.
On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:
On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else Like fuel 😂😂 |
||||||
|
8604 Posts Member #: 573 Formerly Axel Podland |
28th Jun, 2005 at 03:35:55pm
Given that it is very difficult to achieve much less than 8:1 using standard parts (and spending lots of money), I would agree.
Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
|
||||||
![]() 9812 Posts Member #: 332 Resident Cylinder Head Modifier Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem |
28th Jun, 2005 at 05:18:07pm
the 1980s formula 1 turbo cars ran 6.9:1 with a witches brew of fuel
|
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Compression Ratio | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |



