Donations towards server fund so far this month.

 
£0.00 / £100.00 per month
Page:
Home > General Chat > formula 1 fun with numbers

robert

User Avatar

6749 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

hi chaps,

reading a jerez thread on ph got me thinking ,thanks to the graph put up on fuel flow , I
thought hmm, that could be grossly reinterpreted to give the bhp that flow could supply etc etc...

note, first off ,this takes into account no frictional losses ,no harmonics , or any other part of engine design , its purely to do with what if you could use the fuel they give you to its max .

I used 3 different bscf( basically how much power an engine can make for a set amount of fuel) I used .55 a fairly normal turbo engine output trying to be economical ,.45 a reasonable na engine and .35 a very low figure indeed .

I am imagining the f1 engineers are playing with stratified charge,induction and chamber turbulence, multi spark and everything else they can to run lean (average)as possible .hence the use of the .35 figure .



so first I did the bhp calc..





then the torque..






then added 147.5lbs/ft (200nm) to the torque all the way along the rev range,since the regs allow 200nm with no mention of rpm limit .(I have probably missed it and its only allowed between 5600 and 6400 rpm!)







then did the same for bhp ,at this point I thought hmm, this seems a bit of a big gain ,and then made the assumption that they probably cannot make 200nm all through the rpm range and at some point the system would melt,blow a fuse,fall off the car,sieze,or just go flat forever .if they can make it make 200nm at 15k rpm things look rosy !







and then all the data on one graph.





note ,this entire mass of data is a gross oversimplification .but it will be fun to see how close it all is ,also anything under 5k or so would probably be off cam and redundant.i imagine the real world bsfc is going to be around .45.

regards
robert



Edited by robert on 2nd Feb, 2014.

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

Don't they make around 600 bhp and than get an extra 150 bananas from recovered energy?

But if they run at full fuel flow for the whole race they'll not make the end.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph

www.twin-turbo.co.uk

On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


Paul R

User Avatar

4018 Posts
Member #: 1757
Back to Fucking Tool status

Swindon

Wasn't last year 800hp? Seems quite a drop as gp2 is 550hp limit if I'm not mistaken

Drives
-Ford S-max Mk2 Ecoboost
-Rover 100 VVC #2 - track project

Searching is all you need on TurboMinis


steve w

User Avatar

656 Posts
Member #: 1917
AKA chargedzetec

Milton Keynes

Yeah, but this time the ERS is constantly available (no KERS button) so as long as you've stored enough energy, you've got the additional 150 whenever you want.

One big problem will be that a recovery system failure will now become a much bigger problem than previous years.

This is FORD country, on a quiet day you can hear Vauxhalls rusting.


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Oh dear, Robert's found his coloured crayons again *smiley*

Have a look at this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ihblshF_hQ

They are using the waste energy that would have gone through the wastegate by driving a generator off the turbo. Electronic boost control by loading the generator to limit turbo speed, I guess.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


TurboDave16V
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

Green it may be, but I suspect it'll still be dull compared to how F1 and touring car races were in the early/mid 90's...

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



robert

User Avatar

6749 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus


update ,with the 161 bhp added to both graphs ,the bhp one is pretty predictable






the torque one I found interesting , I added the unassisted trq line ,and the 200nm .45 bsfc line to show the crossover point , in case both limits are used .




looks like around 5600 rpm is the crossover point , would be fun if they used a 200nm limit all the way through,but there certainly is some serious torque going on in the lower rpm range, unfortunately well off cam and unlikely to manifest in a real world engine .

id very very vaguely guess best possible is going to be around 425 lbs/ft .

regards
robert

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


robert

User Avatar

6749 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

this is a good one ..

http://youtu.be/4vIjJg0lXgc

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

Still not sure what you are trying to say with all these graphs. Having said that I'm not familiar with what the F1 regs dictate.


On 3rd Feb, 2014 robert said:
this is a good one ..

http://youtu.be/4vIjJg0lXgc


Good vid. Pity the guy has not understood the energy recovery through the turbo. There's nothing to recover when the car is decelerating.

The vid is a must see for those interested in runner lengths. Even at 15k they are running massively long intake and exhaust runners with a turbo.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

What a tosser, but interesting vid non the less.

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph

www.twin-turbo.co.uk

On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


jakejakejake1

User Avatar

293 Posts
Member #: 10010
Senior Member

Northants

If it helps the numbers, I think they are running about 3 bar of boost.
Plus as will mentioned, they have a 100kg fuel limit for the race. which given the maximum permitted fuel flow rate is 100kg/hour, means they won't make it too far at max power!
Given races are normally closer to 2 hours.
Also I don't think any of the teams are actually running the engines all the way up to 15k either, most top out around 12-13k as due to the flow rate issues there's no point in going further.


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

err 500 bar fuel pressure??? 7,251 PSI surly not? 5 bar 72 psi?


Rod S

User Avatar

5988 Posts
Member #: 2024
Formally Retired

Rural Suffolk

On 4th Feb, 2014 Turbo This.. said:
err 500 bar fuel pressure??? 7,251 PSI surly not? 5 bar 72 psi?


Direct injection, not port injection.

And if you think 500 bar is high, you should see the pressures common rail (direct injection) diesels run at ....1,200 bar plus

Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ???


Ben H

User Avatar

3329 Posts
Member #: 184
Senior Member

Melton Mowbray, Pie Country

Nope, 500bar sounds about right. Direct injection needs very high pressures. Most common rail diesel cars run similar pressures these days.

http://www.twin-turbo.co.uk
http://www.hillclimbandsprint.co.uk/default.asp

A man without a project is like a like a woman without a shopping list.


Yo-Han

User Avatar

975 Posts
Member #: 3228
Post Whore

North of the Netherlands

Not so much informed into plenum dynamics, I was looking at that F1 plenum and was thinking that the orientation of the intake into the plenum would make the 'charge' favour the oposed runners because of high flow rate.

Obviously I am wrong but still interested if someone can explain.(?)



On 3rd Feb, 2014 Paul S said:
Still not sure what you are trying to say with all these graphs. Having said that I'm not familiar with what the F1 regs dictate.


On 3rd Feb, 2014 robert said:
this is a good one ..

http://youtu.be/4vIjJg0lXgc


Good vid. Pity the guy has not understood the energy recovery through the turbo. There's nothing to recover when the car is decelerating.

The vid is a must see for those interested in runner lengths. Even at 15k they are running massively long intake and exhaust runners with a turbo.

Dazed and Confused....


Turbo This..

User Avatar

1767 Posts
Member #: 9165
Previously josh4444

Australia, brisbane

ahh of course


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland




On 6th Feb, 2014 Yo-Han said:
Not so much informed into plenum dynamics, I was looking at that F1 plenum and was thinking that the orientation of the intake into the plenum would make the 'charge' favour the oposed runners because of high flow rate.

Obviously I am wrong but still interested if someone can explain.(?)




It certainly is an odd design, but when you consider the tapered inlet to the plenum, albeit at a tangent and pointing towards a runner, and the large volume of the plenum itself, then any effects of the inlet velocity will be dissipated immediately the flow enters the plenum.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Yo-Han

User Avatar

975 Posts
Member #: 3228
Post Whore

North of the Netherlands

Cheers Paul, I was thinking along that line.
Having such a big plenum must have a good 'buffering/equalising' effect..

Dazed and Confused....

Home > General Chat > formula 1 fun with numbers
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: