| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Electronic distance measurement - how ? | |||||||
![]() 690 Posts Member #: 1851 Post Whore Woolavington, Zummerzet |
7th Dec, 2014 at 11:08:37am
I want to measure the distance something is moving vertically in real time over a distance of about 50-60mm and it has to be accurate ±0.25mm. I can't attach anything too heavy to the object, and it does vary it's height quite quickly in an irregular manner.
Metric is for people who can't do fractions. |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
7th Dec, 2014 at 11:17:52am
I'm thinking Linear potentiometer? On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 690 Posts Member #: 9962 Post Whore |
7th Dec, 2014 at 11:24:50am
Yep, me too linear pot is made for this, if you need to you can just measure / log the raw voltage and post process it into a distance after. |
||||||
![]() 690 Posts Member #: 1851 Post Whore Woolavington, Zummerzet |
7th Dec, 2014 at 11:42:34am
Can a linear pot be small and light enough to sit on an SU piston without upsetting the spring balance ? Metric is for people who can't do fractions. |
||||||
![]() 12307 Posts Member #: 565 Carlos Fandango Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex |
7th Dec, 2014 at 11:43:12am
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/RANGE-ROVER-P38-...=item259892d754
On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged... Joe, do you have a photo of your tool? http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1 https://joe1977.imgbb.com/ |
||||||
![]() 690 Posts Member #: 9962 Post Whore |
7th Dec, 2014 at 12:34:34pm
I have mainly used Penny and Giles displacement sensors, here's a useful link;
|
||||||
![]() 690 Posts Member #: 1851 Post Whore Woolavington, Zummerzet |
7th Dec, 2014 at 12:47:22pm
I've been doing some looking on the interweb based around the linear pot idea, and am now wondering if a Hall Effect position sensor would work.
Metric is for people who can't do fractions. |
||||||
|
806 Posts Member #: 989 Post Whore North Yorkshire |
7th Dec, 2014 at 12:48:46pm
An eddy current position sensor will measure the distance you require with the accuracy you require, and is non contact, but will be more expensive than a linear pot.
|
||||||
|
3594 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
7th Dec, 2014 at 01:43:15pm
Would a visual do ? ie place a camera watching the piston ?
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
|
3594 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
7th Dec, 2014 at 01:46:37pm
Turbosmart are now offering the same, and list a part number for a sensor
9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
7th Dec, 2014 at 06:32:55pm
those sensors (or ones almost identical) are standard fit to wastegates on some of the newer HDi engines
turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
696 Posts Member #: 10034 Post Whore Birmingham |
7th Dec, 2014 at 10:14:55pm
Are you trying to do something similar to brett... (photo of linear pot on 3rd page)
|
||||||
|
1267 Posts Member #: 831 Post Whore Montreal, Canada |
7th Dec, 2014 at 10:47:07pm
Is this really simpler than EFI? |
||||||
![]() 690 Posts Member #: 1851 Post Whore Woolavington, Zummerzet |
7th Dec, 2014 at 10:50:06pm
Nothing's new is it.
Metric is for people who can't do fractions. |
||||||
![]() 9502 Posts Member #: 1023 Post Whore Doncaster, South Yorkshire |
7th Dec, 2014 at 10:52:36pm
Sound like it, i have 2 versions one that screws ontop of the damper is good for moving from car to car
Edited by Brett on 7th Dec, 2014. Yes i moved to the darkside |
||||||
|
3594 Posts Member #: 655 Post Whore Northern Ireland |
8th Dec, 2014 at 12:23:48am
On 7th Dec, 2014 evolotion said:
those sensors (or ones almost identical) are standard fit to wastegates on some of the newer HDi engines http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_cqr=true...position+sensor pretty sure they are even cheaper from peugeot. not quite got the stroke you need tho. Handy to know though. Seems they're on quite a few cars. 9.85 @ 145mph
|
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
8th Dec, 2014 at 01:19:44am
On 7th Dec, 2014 jbelanger said:
Is this really simpler than EFI? That depends several factors On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
|
696 Posts Member #: 10034 Post Whore Birmingham |
8th Dec, 2014 at 01:35:30am
On 7th Dec, 2014 Alex said:
Third plan is to use a plastic strip with an optical pickup as suggested elsewhere. You could print a gradient on a strip of projector transparancy and attach to the piston, then pass this through a slotted optical sensor. It should produce a similar output, but without the 'mechanical noise' of a potentiometer and linkages. Edited by PhilR on 8th Dec, 2014. |
||||||
![]() 11046 Posts Member #: 965 Post Whore Preston On The Brook |
8th Dec, 2014 at 01:37:17am
On 7th Dec, 2014 Alex said:
I've been doing some looking on the interweb based around the linear pot idea, and am now wondering if a Hall Effect position sensor would work. Small magnetic rod in place of, or alongside, the damper with the sensor on the top of the carb. on some of our machines we use an analog device in a float sensor to measure fluid level inside the machine, from the outside. The basic principle is a circuit of parallel reed switches and series resistors such that the output is similar to a linear potentiometer but without any physical contact with anything. Obviously there needs to be a magnet attached to the moving device. It might be possible to place a magnet on the top side of the piston inside the dashpot with the sensor on the outside and place the reed switches in the same divisions as the SU needle data. A direct comparison............ On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be... So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'... On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........ |
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
8th Dec, 2014 at 09:56:41am
On 7th Dec, 2014 Alex said:
I don't think I can do it with a laser or optically with an off the shelf product, so I'm open to suggestions. I'd suggest ultrasonics or infrared. It's not going to be entirely "off the shelf" to fit to an SU but there are pleny of cheap modules (UT or IR) for interfacing with arduino, Raspberry Pi etc that could be modified to fit - IR probably easier as the sensors are smaller. As for accuracy, IMO should be fine if you calibrate against physical measurement. The IR autofocus on my fairly basic camera does the macro lens accurately at 2cm. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
8th Dec, 2014 at 11:58:45am
another option is to use the linear encoder from a cheap vernier calliper. most have a serial output, and again can be interfaced to an arduino or similar. turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
9th Dec, 2014 at 09:48:05am
A typical hobbyist IR setup
Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
|
696 Posts Member #: 10034 Post Whore Birmingham |
9th Dec, 2014 at 04:04:35pm
That's pretty cool. You could make it permanent and keep the damper in place and not interfere with the piston movement.
Edited by PhilR on 9th Dec, 2014. |
||||||
|
696 Posts Member #: 10034 Post Whore Birmingham |
9th Dec, 2014 at 04:50:45pm
Another idea: Could you use a MAP sensor to measure the pressure inside the dashpot, then infer the piston height from that? |
||||||
|
5988 Posts Member #: 2024 Formally Retired Rural Suffolk |
9th Dec, 2014 at 05:38:42pm
On 9th Dec, 2014 PhilR said:
Another idea: Could you use a MAP sensor to measure the pressure inside the dashpot, then infer the piston height from that? No, because - and I do still remember how a museum piece like the SU works - the partial vacuum in the venturi area is transferred to above the chamber piston hence why, in a normally aspirated engine, it's called a constant venturi. Same applies boosted. The pressure above the piston should be a measure of flow not height.
Plus the damper would skew the pressure/height ratio under load changes. The dashpot itself is vented to atmosphere at the top, the size of the hole being one of the things that determines the rate of rise. A quick bit of maths says, assuming a 10bit ADC on your logger/weapon of choice, you could get a 0.295mm resolution from that particular IR setup and as it's so linear in this particular working range you would probably only have to calibrate at a very few points. I'm sure there are lots better but for US$10 plus postage and a couple of bits of plastic tube, If I had a carb, I'd give it a go. Schrödinger's cat - so which one am I ??? |
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Electronic distance measurement - how ? | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |






