Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > All I want is a tight box and good head!

Skortchio

42 Posts
Member #: 10317
Member

Basildon, Essex

Hello chaps,

The g/f's mini was running a tired metro turbo lump which the dumped it's box just before Xmas.

Initially she was going to just repair the box and carry on, but I may have planted the idea that as it was off the road anyway why not tweak the set up a little...

So here's where we are currently:

1275 Metro turbo short block freshly rebuilt, cross drilled/ balanced crank, boggo turbo pistons, 266 cam.
2" exhaust.
GT1549 turbo.
Nodiz Pro ignition.
Turbo clutch (20% is out of stock currently but on the list)

X-pin diff, centre pick up, and freshly rebuilt box.

Running on 98RON minimum but she lives right near a Shell garage so 100 is readily available.

The goal of the build is a fun, punchy midrange car. Pitching at a 135-140 range for power with torque not too far behind. Staying fairly conservative to remain budget conscious (Yeah that worked out well...).


So with that in mind, I have a couple of questions for the collective intelligence that is you guys:

I've now read the entire internet (or it feels like it!) trying to get a majority answer on head and boxes.

Firstly the easy one, head! I'm estimating at approx. 8.8:1 cr (also assuming to be around 13psi) but haven't done the solid math yet. Which should equate to about 37cc chamber volume, minus dish and gasket that's only a few cc out the head so easily attainable.
But, porting and peaks?

#I'm not a fan of trimming the peak because of the change in characteristics and it's not a great yield of chamber size, unless I'm bass akwards on that?

#Porting has been suggested as unnecessary on this build and would frankly save a chunk of cash, thoughts?

Next up gearbox, been round in circles on gear set choice. SC or fresh helicals, standard drops either way. If the helicals are going in new does it pay to just go SC and be done with it? Some say yes, some say no... I'm lost frankly. I run auto so I have no experience :p

She's not an aggressive driver and isn't rough with her clutch, the car will be a 2nd vehicle with a majority of summer use.

So there you go, still awake?

Advice please, head and box. What would you do for meaty torque in the 120-150 range with that set up?
I'm really keen on efficiency rather than just adding boost to cover design failings.


Cheerios :)

Edited by Skortchio on 5th Jan, 2017.


Tom Fenton
Site Admin

User Avatar

15300 Posts
Member #: 337
Fearless Tom Fenton, Avon Park 2007 & 2008 class D winner

&

TM legend.

Rotherham South Yorkshire

GT17 and Megajolt.


On 29th Nov, 2016 madmk1 said:


On 28th Nov, 2016 Rob Gavin said:
I refuse to pay for anything else


Like fuel 😂😂


Will

167 Posts
Member #: 11091
Advanced Member




On 5th Jan, 2017 Tom Fenton said:
GT17 and Megajolt.


Why megajolt over nodiz?
(Thought it was pretty much copied with some extras chucked in?)


Skortchio

42 Posts
Member #: 10317
Member

Basildon, Essex

Might not have been concise enough, all is done bar the head and box.
Gt15 shouldn't have trouble hitting the mark unless I've totally misread the map and calcs?


On 5th Jan, 2017 Tom Fenton said:
GT17 and Megajolt.


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

If you don't need to remove the beak in the chamber to get the volume, then don't. Just modify the chamber as you would for performance NA use, and to the size you require.
A restriction is a restriction and some port work can only improve things performance wise.

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland


On 5th Jan, 2017 Skortchio said:
Might not have been concise enough, all is done bar the head and box.
Gt15 shouldn't have trouble hitting the mark unless I've totally misread the map and calcs?


On 5th Jan, 2017 Tom Fenton said:
GT17 and Megajolt.


The biggest issue for the GT1549 is the highly restrictive turbine built for slow speed small diesels. It will spool up quick but then hit your torque hard before you hit the rev limit. Depends what you want.

Same goes for any of the GT15s with the exception of the GT1548, but that is a bit small on the compressor side for a 1275.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


Skortchio

42 Posts
Member #: 10317
Member

Basildon, Essex

Revving out isn't a concern, the build isn't for redlining as it's not her thing. Solid midrange, road based fun, traffic light gp and tons of punch out of corners.


robert

User Avatar

6752 Posts
Member #: 828
Post Whore

uranus

keep beaks , 8.8:1 fine , leave head stock ,use a soft 250 ish degree cam , or stock cam .big intercooler . see what happens. try with helical .

Medusa + injection = too much torque for the dyno ..https://youtu.be/qg5o0_tJxYM


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

If you don't want to spend a lot on head work, some simple valve and seat work and modifying the chamber as mentioned will yield some decent flow gains.

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Skortchio

42 Posts
Member #: 10317
Member

Basildon, Essex

Ah pap knew I forgot something, 266 cam is fitted.


slater

User Avatar

1030 Posts
Member #: 1291
Post Whore

Suffolk / Birmingham

Biggest problem with the Sc gears is that the ratios are too close for road really. Running a tall diff ratio for cruising on the road hurts your pulling away which is obviously important I'm a road car too.

I don't think you need to pay as much attention to the head as you would on an NA car but it's easy to make a difference so maybe go for the low hanging fruit with a bit of a fettle to remove the bad casting and a back cut on the valves but leave out the expense of seat cutting and guide changing etc. Depends how much you can do yourself I guess?


Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

if your going to run highish compression ratio, with a piston change you can probably run a decent 2nd hand ported NA head.


a decent helical box will be happy at 140 especially if your a bit sympathetic with it ( not too many burnouts from the lights....) definatly fit a cross pin diff though.

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Skortchio

42 Posts
Member #: 10317
Member

Basildon, Essex

Thanks for the input, chaps.

Given the cost of a SC set, may well plumb for fresh helis.
Basic flow on the head seems the route to go too.

Best get on with that and see how it works out! *happy*


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

Is the head the stock 33mm inlet valve one ?
Do you have seat cutters ?

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Skortchio

42 Posts
Member #: 10317
Member

Basildon, Essex

It's a stock Metty turbo head, so I would assume just the larger stems on exhaust.

I was going to drop you a note regarding some cutting and the previous mentioned basic fettle, don't have the tooling for seat cutting or larger valves (if that's of any benefit on turbos).

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > All I want is a tight box and good head!
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: