Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > 998 head choice

Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

Good morning.

Now I've been speaking to the guy who gonna be rebuilding my cylinder head, now he's telling me I shouldn't use the 12g295 head I have and instead pocket the block and go with a 12g940 as they will flow better and make more power with the turbo.


Anyone have an ideas? Because I'd rather stick with a 295 but I want this engine to be drivable but also be able to use out on track aswell

Thanks Stephen


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

He's right.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

What's your application ? Mild road motor, full race ... ?
For anything other than a balls out 998 the 295 will work absolutely fine.
The 940 will outflow the 295 but at the expense of port velocity. If you do use the 940 retain the stock port sizing.

Phil.

Edited by Turbo Phil on 10th Mar, 2017.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

Gonna be fast Road and track day use

Engine spec so far

266 cam
+40 on a plus 998 block
Balanced wedged xdrilled back drilled and turfined crank shaft
GT1549 turbo
Variable boost controller
Ecu

So just head engine trying to work out


steve2016

81 Posts
Member #: 11403
Advanced Member

I would Probably stick with the 295 to save stripping the block down to have it pocketed (if its all built up right now)


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

Block is currently in bits


gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester

Having done it, the 940 provided much better performance.

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

Thanks

What was the driveablity like?

Does it rev better?

Was there torque gain? Over the 295



On 10th Mar, 2017 gr4h4m said:
Having done it, the 940 provided much better performance.


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

What was the power/torque difference between your engine with the 295 and the 940 Graham ? Do you have a graph for both ?
When I did the 940 for you I left the inlet port almost stock size, with just a good tidy up.

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

I have a big valve 940 on a 998 metro with metro cam. Standard port twin carb. Its slower than the original till up to 1800 ish rpm then performs very well. Smooth reving etc. Must say compression was 12 to 1 with the 998 head and now its around 10.5 to 1. So can have something to do with that. Never tested it on a bench because... well here there is no one with a bench willing to test a mini

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


apbellamy

User Avatar

16540 Posts
Member #: 4241
King Gaycharger, butt plug dealer, Sheldon Cooper and a BAC but generally a niceish fella if you dont mind a northerner

Rotherham, South Yorkshire

My opinion - to get the 12G295 to work for an n/a engine it will need a fair amount of meat taking of the face. Making it useless for anything else. Better to sell that (££££) and put a 12G940 on. Probably work out cost neutral.

On 11th Feb, 2015 robert said:
i tried putting soap on it , and heating it to brown , then slathered my new lube on it

*hehe!*


gr4h4m

User Avatar

4890 Posts
Member #: 1775
Post Whore

Chester


I have had a search and some of the graphs are missing for some reason. Anyway it looks like the torque figures are about the same, and its up 22bhp

On 10th Mar, 2017 Turbo Phil said:
What was the power/torque difference between your engine with the 295 and the 940 Graham ? Do you have a graph for both ?
When I did the 940 for you I left the inlet port almost stock size, with just a good tidy up.

Phil.

I run a supercharger and I don't care the TB is on the wrong side.
VEMS + 12 PSI + Liquid Intercooler = Small Bore FUN!


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

Was it up 22bhp across thw whole range or overall??


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

Graham's is supercharged so losing a little bottom end from the 940 head wouldn't be noticeable I suspect.
Either head will work, but with the small turbo you intend to use it might run out of steam before the bigger port/valve become of real benefit. I know Graham revs his pretty hard and said the engine was willing to rev to. The 22hp he gained was peak.
If you do use the 940 keep the small 33.3mm inlet and keep the port sizing stock for best effect on the smallbore.

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

Gonna use the 12g295 head with over sized valves and a little bit of porting then should be good

Thanks for the help guys appreciate it. Always helpful as always


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

What valves are you going to use in the 295 ?

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.


Gonna use single small collect 1275 valves turned down to fit. 3 angle valve seats. May run 33 29 on sizing though

On 11th Mar, 2017 Turbo Phil said:
What valves are you going to use in the 295 ?

Phil.


Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4633 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

If using the 29mm exhaust valves you'll need to pocket the block, or recess them and ensure there's adequate clearance from the block face.

Phil.

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


Paul S

User Avatar

8604 Posts
Member #: 573
Formerly Axel

Podland

The 940 may be better on NA 998s but in this case you wont see any advatage over the 295.

Engine breathing is usually limited by a bottle neck somewhere in the system: intake, head, cam, exhaust, turbo.

Your engine will not be able to breath very well with a GT1549 creating a lot of back pressure. You need to change the turbo first before using the 940 head.

Saul Bellow - "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep."
Stephen Hawking - "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge."


mw3

User Avatar

684 Posts
Member #: 9590
Post Whore

Derby

For mine I used a reworked 998 head with 31.75 inlets and 29.5 exhaust valves

Matt W




On 14th Mar, 2012 mw3 said:
Got a nice big delivery from Carl at Force Racing today.


Chalkie

1909 Posts
Member #: 9764
Post Whore

Northamptonshire.

What head?

Cam4180 12g202 12g206 12g295??

Thanks


On 12th Mar, 2017 mw3 said:
For mine I used a reworked 998 head with 31.75 inlets and 29.5 exhaust valves

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > 998 head choice
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: