| Page: |
| Home > General Chat > highest boost for 8,6:1? | |||||||
|
148 Posts Member #: 98 Advanced Member Slovenia |
5th Feb, 2004 at 09:03:27pm
I run 8,6:1 CR on my turbo mini. |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
6th Feb, 2004 at 01:37:52am
There is so much that can change this but i would guess at around 14 psi?? probably run more but that will be very safe with a intercooler and about 10 psi with out. Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
6th Feb, 2004 at 07:53:26am
Just out of interest, what compression ratios do people run and where is your boost threshold abd max psi?
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
10th Feb, 2004 at 12:39:08am
Hell mate 20 PSI on a 998cc that must be good fun, have you any power figures as it would be good to know what that's making. And as for the C/R i did realise you could get a mini that low! Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
10th Feb, 2004 at 02:11:59pm
My 1380 with standard deck height and a standard head came in at around 6.2:1, had the block decked ~3mm and the head skimmed 2mm to bring that back up though :) turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
10th Feb, 2004 at 04:26:01pm
Isn't that an unswept volume of 66cc?
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
|
485 Posts Member #: 149 Senior Member Alberta, Canada |
10th Feb, 2004 at 05:55:16pm
Ok i've just done the sums on the 6.2:1 1380 motor and you would have to have a head volume of 37.13cc.
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. |
||||||
![]() 5329 Posts Member #: 140 Proven 200+bhp & Avon Park 05,06,07 Class D 3rd place |
10th Feb, 2004 at 06:36:00pm
Yes guys that does sound a little to low , as my 1380cc pistons came close to the deck high, and only tho was skimmed off the top of the deck and head.
Best 1/4 mile 13.2 seconds @116 mph
|
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
10th Feb, 2004 at 07:04:59pm
pistons were 6.something mill down the bore and dish of 16cc. They wernt origionally for the a-series as far as i can tell. had a little hunt for my origional calculations, but cant find them anywhere :(
turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
485 Posts Member #: 149 Senior Member Alberta, Canada |
10th Feb, 2004 at 07:45:27pm
The latter is very true if they fit and work thats all that counts...
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. |
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
11th Feb, 2004 at 02:21:14am
the triumph pistons arnt quite 74mm, more like 73.7mm, iv got a set of em too turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
302 Posts Member #: 60 Forgotten more than most ever know |
11th Feb, 2004 at 06:31:41am
Triumph pistons are 73,65 mm.
|
||||||
|
485 Posts Member #: 149 Senior Member Alberta, Canada |
11th Feb, 2004 at 12:32:13pm
Yo Jukka are you states side ??
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe. |
||||||
|
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
11th Feb, 2004 at 01:08:02pm
Pretty sure he's Netherlands...
AlexF |
||||||
|
302 Posts Member #: 60 Forgotten more than most ever know |
11th Feb, 2004 at 06:47:43pm
Nope,
|
||||||
|
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
11th Feb, 2004 at 11:02:47pm
Sorry Jukka!
AlexF |
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
14th Feb, 2004 at 04:03:27am
Afraid i have no idea what engine these particular pistons were for, only that they were intended for a triumph engine, found some triumph forum a while back and posted the details.
turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
14th Feb, 2004 at 04:07:34am
jukka, jstu a quick note re-haveing pistons so far down the bore!
turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
5795 Posts Member #: 80 AFRacing LTD Newbury, Berks |
14th Feb, 2004 at 11:51:50am
good plan evo :)
AlexF |
||||||
|
302 Posts Member #: 60 Forgotten more than most ever know |
14th Feb, 2004 at 04:57:17pm
73,65 mm pistons were used in Spitfires and 1300 sedans (Toledo ???) One of them had split skirt, the other not. Either of them are more or less outdated designs and in my opinion not worth the hassle. There are stronger (but expensive) modern pistons available that need no tricks to fit. If you want a cheap big pistons for Mini engine you can use 1300 Ford push rod engine piston. 74 mm, correct comp height plus piston pin is of same OD as Mini. Naturally it is a flat top piston and totally out of question in turbo engines (sky high CR)
|
||||||
![]() 2641 Posts Member #: 19 Post Whore newcastle |
14th Feb, 2004 at 08:10:36pm
first of all 38 is YOUNG !!!
Everyone knows that instructions only have to be read if the thing doesn't work....
|
||||||
| Home > General Chat > highest boost for 8,6:1? | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |



(if its the same ones ur referring too) came out a short block 1430 i purchased a while back. horrible pistons, got that nasty big slotted oil groove and a really long skirt. IMHO ofcouce!