Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Rockers 1.5:1 or STD

RED850

User Avatar

243 Posts
Member #: 89
Senior Member

Sydney Australia

Hi all, juts getting your thoughts here, i have just placed my order for the Avonbar Phase 3 Cam kit, would you prefer to use the STd rockers with this cam or continue with my 1.5:1 rockers?

do not care to much about drivability etc i drive the car twice to three times a month on the road and a few track days and drag runs in between.

thanks fo ryour help

179hp on 12psi 1293cc of pure A series
14.0et @101 mph


turbo hogster

1641 Posts
Member #: 178
Post Whore

stowmaket suffolk

stick with standard as they give slightly more torque at the bottom with out losing hardley any at the top.

always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas


giallofly

User Avatar

I helped keep this site alive!

4436 Posts
Member #: 164
The Stig..

Newport Pagnell

The ph3 is a very spikey cam......

i ditched it back to the 2.

On 21st Jan, 2011 fastcarl said:


therefore acheiving two things , a sore knob and a beer bellyl




wil_h

User Avatar

9258 Posts
Member #: 123
Post Whore

Betwix Harrogate and York

I ran 1.5s on a Ph2, totally useless. Could hardly get the car off the line.

Sold the PH2 to Jon^^^ and put a KC500 in (1.5s work ok with this cam).

Wil

Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph



On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:

the design shows a distinct lack of imagination,
talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol

On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry.


turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

JF- were you running 1.5's with it aswell?

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



SumpNut
Forum Mod

User Avatar

1322 Posts
Member #: 28
Post Whore

Milton Keynes

I run 1.5's with the MED cam - which is the same as the phase 2 I belive.

Works well for me, very drivable with no lumpyness


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

I run 1,5s on a Ph2, and find it not much worse than what it was like on 1,3s.. Getting off the line is dead easy.

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

IMHO forget the ph 3 cam unless you are totally tracking the car ALL the time.

its a tad to radical for the road

phase 2 driveability and power!
phase 3 OTT






Mike

User Avatar

1171 Posts
Member #: 107
Post Whore

Sunny Sussex

seems to be an area for discussion, there was a thread a while ago about this but was never really 'concluded', i've got a ph2 and not sure wether to run std 1.3's or get a 1.5



iain
Site Admin

User Avatar

8506 Posts
Member #: 16
Sold the turbo and seeing what the C20XE can do!

Near Lincoln

i'm running a ph2 and 1.5's although it hasnt turned a pulley yet *happy*


giallofly

User Avatar

I helped keep this site alive!

4436 Posts
Member #: 164
The Stig..

Newport Pagnell

Yes i run 1.5's, tbh i have never tried 1.3's. the engine on boost a 3200rpm.

The ph 3 was a very different animal, coming on cam/boost at 4000rpm upto 8000.

This is in a 1312 cc engine with carfully set ignition/cam timing and a rolling tune at PB'b.

The phase 3 did proce any more power, it put the power higher up the rev range.

JF.

On 21st Jan, 2011 fastcarl said:


therefore acheiving two things , a sore knob and a beer bellyl




Turbo Phil

User Avatar

4641 Posts
Member #: 20
My sister is so fit I won't show anyone her picture

Lake District

I have run the phase 2 with 1.5 rockers. Only a slight hint of "caminess" on idle, totally drivable with a good power spread. This cam is great for road motor, power from low down, and pulls nicely up to 6 - 6,500 or so. This engine had a moderatley modified head and 8.5-1 compression, running a T3 Turbo.
I have also run the phase 3 with 1.5 rockers. This is indeed a more "racey" profile, less power under 3000, but when it comes in, it comes in ! and it just revs and revs. The compression is lower at 7.8-1 and the head is more modified. But running a T2 Turbo this time, so i think this helps make it more tractable than it otherwise would be.

I've never visited a rolling road so couldn't say which cam is better, power wise, but the phase 3 does seem better from a "seat of the pants" point of view.
Though i know Jon has gone back to the P2 from the P3 and got some great times on the 1/4 mile this year, so i guess this speaks greater volumes than my "road testing" lol.

This doesn't really answer your question, but anyway ..... lol

Phil. *smiley*

WWW.TURBO-MINI.COM


RED850

User Avatar

243 Posts
Member #: 89
Senior Member

Sydney Australia

hhmm very interesting replies there thanks to all of you.

well i was using the kc500 kent cam for the past 5 years with 1.5 and it was really good just a little lumpy but nothing really, but the cam and followers are just screwed now, i will post some pics for you all to see.

i have just ordered the ph3 cam kit and they say to only use the 1.3 rockers, the motor should be back in the car in late nov so i will see how it goes then and let you all know.

reading the replies they are mixed, i guess it can come down to so many factors, if the cam timing is not spot on then it will be a problem and then of course the ignition timing will also not help if it is not spot on,then if the comp is too low then it migth be even worse.

well i will give it a go with 1.3's and if it is no good i will get the ph2 cam in jan/ feb when i fit the new gearbox i will start building later this year

thanks again

179hp on 12psi 1293cc of pure A series
14.0et @101 mph


RED850

User Avatar

243 Posts
Member #: 89
Senior Member

Sydney Australia




here is my head



179hp on 12psi 1293cc of pure A series
14.0et @101 mph


turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

You think the Kent 500 (mgMetro profile) was lumpy? And you're going for a ph3????

Woweee, you're in for a surprise!

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

red the phase 2

fire this in and time it at 108 deg & 1.3 rockers
i can assure you its a fantastic cam!

none lumpy ticks over like a small tiger & when this comes in! with the turbo its like a hungry lion as Fabrice once described.*wink*

its so true

i bet you will be throwing the phase 3 over the hedge once you have run this.*frown*

Please keep us posted *smiley*

Edited by BENROSS on 2nd Nov, 2005.






turbo hogster

1641 Posts
Member #: 178
Post Whore

stowmaket suffolk

does any one no the overlap period for a p2 and p3

always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas


BENROSS

User Avatar

9812 Posts
Member #: 332
Resident Cylinder Head Modifier

Mitsi Evo 7, 911, Cossie. & all the chavs ...... won no problem

here you go

http://www.speedgenie.co.uk/avonbar/camshafts1.html






turbodave16v
Forum Mod

10980 Posts
Member #: 17
***16***

SouthPark, Colorado

What was the discussion regarding the differences between the 'supplied' and 'actual' timing figures... I'm sure i recall this recently???

On 17th Nov, 2014 Tom Fenton said:
Sorry to say My Herpes are no better


Ready to feel Ancient ??? This is 26 years old as of 2022 https://youtu.be/YQQokcoOzeY



turbo hogster

1641 Posts
Member #: 178
Post Whore

stowmaket suffolk

buy the looks of that cam i guess you were using 1.5 rockers

always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas


RED850

User Avatar

243 Posts
Member #: 89
Senior Member

Sydney Australia

yes i was using the mini spares 1.5:1 rockers

but i will go back to std ratio

now does anyone know what the LCA's for both the PH2 and PH3 cams?

Edited by RED850 on 4th Nov, 2005.

179hp on 12psi 1293cc of pure A series
14.0et @101 mph


turbo hogster

1641 Posts
Member #: 178
Post Whore

stowmaket suffolk

thats another reason i dont like them , they have a tendancy to chew cams and followers up for breakfast.

i think if you do use 1.5's it may pay to use 1.3' for a few 1000 miles then switch to 1.5's, this will give the cam time to case harden a bit.

always looking for them bigger bunches of bannanas


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

This only happens if you don't change valve spring pressure accordingly. The reason why the 1,5 chew valvatraisn is because people use the same springs as they did on the 1,3s. This in addition to the "harder springs is better pub factor"

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



Mike

User Avatar

1171 Posts
Member #: 107
Post Whore

Sunny Sussex

how do u work out which springs to use with what cam? for example i have the ph2 fitted, unsure what springs are on the MED turbo head i have tho. Still undecided on whether to go 1.3 or 1.5 too.

Edited by Mike on 17th Jan, 2006.



slim_shadyuk

133 Posts
Member #: 703
Advanced Member

Plymouth, On the floating skip known as HMS Albion

In a previous post on this subject didnt avonbar strongly recommend using 1.3's with a phase 2?

Whats going to break next!?

Turbominis Worst Advice winner 2006, get in

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Rockers 1.5:1 or STD
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: