| Page: |
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Suspension mods | |||||||
|
5 Posts Member #: 548 Junior Member Chester |
22nd Dec, 2005 at 08:40:03pm
Just wondered if anyone has any experience of the MiniSpares uprated rubber cones for the suspension.
|
||||||
![]() 3184 Posts Member #: 628 Post Whore a LIL fishing village on the coast - Newcastle Upon Tyne |
22nd Dec, 2005 at 09:31:05pm
if it is the poly type rubbers / bushes they are supposed to be better, and make the car more "stiff" they also last alot longer than the rubber counter part, and dont perrish.
On 17th Aug, 2009 Jay#2 said:
I doubt I'll be dipping into the 13's like you did though! |
||||||
![]() 2641 Posts Member #: 19 Post Whore newcastle |
22nd Dec, 2005 at 09:46:42pm
no.. the cones on the trummpets
Everyone knows that instructions only have to be read if the thing doesn't work....
|
||||||
![]() 3184 Posts Member #: 628 Post Whore a LIL fishing village on the coast - Newcastle Upon Tyne |
22nd Dec, 2005 at 11:16:05pm
ahhh sorry ignore me then
On 17th Aug, 2009 Jay#2 said:
I doubt I'll be dipping into the 13's like you did though! |
||||||
|
982 Posts Member #: 97 Post Whore Near Daventry, midlands |
23rd Dec, 2005 at 05:11:48pm
i've tried a few solutions in the conespring front. I've had std ones, albeit quiet old, which were hard and unforgiving.
I've seen the future and tbh its Pie
|
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
23rd Dec, 2005 at 05:43:29pm
what are "innospec aftermarket ones" ? and why did you remove them? turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
9258 Posts Member #: 123 Post Whore Betwix Harrogate and York |
23rd Dec, 2005 at 05:56:28pm
I've been using the red-dots on the hilcilimber and they were a good improvement from the yelllow-dots.
Fastest 998 mini in the world? 13.05 1/4 mile 106mph
On 2nd Jan, 2013 fastcarl said:
the design shows a distinct lack of imagination, talk about starting off with a clean sheet of paper, then not bothering to fucking draw on it,lol On 20th Apr, 2012 Paul S said:
I'm mainly concerned about swirl in the runners caused by the tangential entry. |
||||||
|
982 Posts Member #: 97 Post Whore Near Daventry, midlands |
23rd Dec, 2005 at 06:13:10pm
innospec ones were ones which were supplied by a forum member on minifinity, they had very poor build quality and sometimes 'failed' were the rubber actually split internally when loaded up, but some were ok (bit hit and miss). Was obvious when they worked or not as one of the hi-los would need massive amounts of adjusting to make the car level. I had them on mine till one collapsed, so i removed them for safety sake. Edited by andeh on 23rd Dec, 2005. I've seen the future and tbh its Pie
|
||||||
|
5 Posts Member #: 548 Junior Member Chester |
23rd Dec, 2005 at 08:41:45pm
Thanks for the info. Are the red dots better than std ones or are they not worth the money?
|
||||||
|
982 Posts Member #: 97 Post Whore Near Daventry, midlands |
23rd Dec, 2005 at 10:06:01pm
in my personal opinion, they are NOT worth the £200 for a car set. They are better, but not that much. A few others may disagree with me, but to me taking in account of the benefits (better ride) and downers (soft ride/slight loss of traction) are put down by the price. I've seen the future and tbh its Pie
|
||||||
![]() 2909 Posts Member #: 83 Post Whore Glasgow, Scotland |
24th Dec, 2005 at 12:53:57am
andeh, have you tried NEW std genuine cones? .. this is what i'll be getting soon as i have some money :( mine are a bit shagged i feel, and probably the originals that came on teh subframe so 24 odd years old. turbo 16v k-series 11.9@118.9 :)
|
||||||
|
982 Posts Member #: 97 Post Whore Near Daventry, midlands |
24th Dec, 2005 at 08:16:17am
i havent personally tried them, but everyone i've spoken to who has fitted new std items hasnt ever complained about them. Concidering u can get them for around 25quid a corner its the cheapest route when replacing them. The front ones on my 94 car were so shagged it was silly they literally cant have been moving at all, and i took them off a good few years ago (i think they were 8 years old when removed). I think the recomended replacement is at 5or6 year, but may have to check on that. I've seen the future and tbh its Pie
|
||||||
![]() 6274 Posts Member #: 509 Post Whore Isle of Man |
25th Dec, 2005 at 09:45:25am
sorry if im rehashing old/irrelevant info but....to harden up the std cones, they just need a larger surface area in relation to the cone, if you give them a bigger platform to work against they will be much much firmer.
"Turbo's make torque, and torque makes fun"
|
||||||
|
5 Posts Member #: 548 Junior Member Chester |
26th Dec, 2005 at 10:47:27am
I was considering new std cones, but read somewhere the late Rover cones were softer than the old ones. Didn't want a softer ride as I use the car on the track quite a bit. If you buy a std cone now, what spec is it? This is what led me down the red dot option. Another problem with the red dots is getting the car low enough. I think you have to modify the Hi-Los to get track lowered cars.
|
||||||
|
Forum Mod ![]() 5933 Posts Member #: 784 9 times Avon Park Class C winner Milton Keynes |
29th Dec, 2005 at 11:57:17am
I do know that Max Hunter was having trouble at one Miglia meeting, he was something like a second down on lap time so fitted new standard cones (I think) problem solved.
I seriously doubt it! |
||||||
| Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Suspension mods | |||||||
|
|||||||
| Page: |





