Your password will probably need resetting - don't panic. We have upgraded a few things and improved the hashing of passwords. Just use the Forgot Password link.
Page:
Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Wiped center main bearing

Joe C

User Avatar

12307 Posts
Member #: 565
Carlos Fandango

Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

mg metro water to oil cooler?

On 28th Aug, 2011 Kean said:
At the risk of being sigged...

Joe, do you have a photo of your tool?



http://www.turbominis.co.uk/forums/index.p...9064&lastpost=1

https://joe1977.imgbb.com/



Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 16th Jun, 2009 Vegard said:
Too low oil temps is bad for the engine.

I trashed my Mini on the track this weekend, oil temps never reached 70degrees without oil cooler. Oil Cooler is not needed it seems.
I need to heat my oil in some way...


Thats 50 years of bad engine designe then isnt it *happy*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway




On 16th Jun, 2009 mini13 said:
mg metro water to oil cooler?


Yes, thanks to Apbellamy I now have a nice one, but it doesn't work with my fancy SH oil filter head.

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUhWrGgOEjI

Still watching that oil gauge *oh well*

Of on holiday soon in the Mini, so 1200miles all in. That might settle my nerves if it survuves, but then there is that bloody head gasket!!

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


fab

User Avatar

1497 Posts
Member #: 100
Parisien Turbo Expert

Paris\' suburb

may be should you take a five port head in your boot (in case of...)
*happy*


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

I have been trying to understand what caused this failure as there has yet been no real reason found, and Im not use that the missing O ring was the route cause. I have still found fluctuation in oil pressures in varying conditions after the rebuild, and its always been playing on the back of my mind.

After speaking to a couple people, my engine builder and the other from the company I work for in the US about a machine failure at work, I asked them about this failure on a personal level.

It has been speculated that the larger bearing clearances suggested by certain engine builders, might actualy cause more harm. The reasoning behind this could perhaps be explained by an article I found, its the closest I have found to what was explained to me. It was suggested that this situation might not be pressent at all engine conditions.

http://www.machinerylubrication.com/articl...p?articleid=754

Basicaly the larger the clearance, the more movement, the greater chance of 'Dry whip'.

It has also been said that although the crank may flex, it will only flex as much as it is un suported. Increasing bearing clearance alows more flex and movement in the bearing which could result in this 'Dry whip' phenomenon.

So, wher am I going with this. The engine is due a rebuild, and during this time i will be changine to the groove/ groove bearings and closing up the bearing clearance and then see what happens. I am putting the oil pressure fluctuations doen to a combination of oil feed to the main, cam bearings, and the location of the oil pressure regulator on the MPI block at the end of No3 main bearing gallery. I suspect the oil jets are pulsing also at their lift point due to this fluctuation in pressure, which is adding to the problem.

Time will tell*happy*

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland

When you say the Groove/Groove bearings do you mean the old A type ones,

I can only advise on my own expereience here but I would never fit these over the Later A+ type as the only Time I have ever had Main bearing failure has been with this type of bearing, Since I moved the the Later A+ type bearing in ACL duraglide I have never had any Main bearing problems on any of my Race engines

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

Paul, did you use cross drilled mains with these plain bearings?

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland

Yes vegard MED full worked cranks,IMO i think that the non grooved main bearing offers a better filament surface with a reduced presure area

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 7th Dec, 2009 PaulH said:
When you say the Groove/Groove bearings do you mean the old A type ones,

I can only advise on my own expereience here but I would never fit these over the Later A+ type as the only Time I have ever had Main bearing failure has been with this type of bearing, Since I moved the the Later A+ type bearing in ACL duraglide I have never had any Main bearing problems on any of my Race engines


Well, I have suffered bearing failure with the plain/ gloove bearings and an MED cross drilled crank But not suffered any failures with groove/ groove bearings ( just havent used them before *tongue*) I am not convinced I have seen the end of the problem yet.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


mowog

72 Posts
Member #: 6792
Advanced Member

The failed bearings do look like oil stavation. I don't think the missing 'O' ring had much to do with it.

I see that you say you've put some BMW Oil Jets in. Could you provide a bit more info as to what these are and where in the oil circuit they are?

Also, I'm sure that you do know what you are doing, however what type of engine lube did you use on assembly and did you crank it over to get oil presure before starting it after your rebuild?

For this HP output I would recommend 2.5 to 3 thou main bearing clearances (which is I think what you said you have. This will not cause any undue crank whip, especially with the oil presures you have.

Considering that the centre main copped it the worst, I'd guess (at this stage) that the oid centrufuged from the main by over-feeding 2 and 3 Big ends at higher RPM


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

I cannot understand why a bigger bearing clearance can reduce crank flex. There isn't supposed to be any contact between the two, and there WILL be oil between the surfaces as long there is sufficient oil flow/pressure.

If you search for BMW jets, you should find what you're looking for.

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



PaulH

User Avatar

1346 Posts
Member #: 2340
Post Whore

Dublin Ireland




On 11th Dec, 2009 mowog said:

Considering that the centre main copped it the worst, I'd guess (at this stage) that the oid centrufuged from the main by over-feeding 2 and 3 Big ends at higher RPM


I'm sorry but that just does not wash with me I mean the Centre main is what feeds oil to the crank which in turn feeds 2 and 3 big end surly the oil is going to first oil the main bearing be four entering the 6mm drilling in the crank and centrefuge out to 2 and 3 big end :$

On 17th Feb, 2009 Rob H said:

I find the easiest way is to super glue the bolt to the end of one of my fingers.

______________________________________________________


mowog

72 Posts
Member #: 6792
Advanced Member


On 11th Dec, 2009 Vegard said:
I cannot understand why a bigger bearing clearance can reduce crank flex. There isn't supposed to be any contact between the two, and there WILL be oil between the surfaces as long there is sufficient oil flow/pressure.

If you search for BMW jets, you should find what you're looking for.


Check what I wrote, I said 'that it shouldn't cause any undue crank flex' not that it will reduce it. Especially with 998 cranks. They are short stroke and the mains / big end overlap so this actually makes them quite stout and stiff. Think about this, an extra 1 or 1.5 thousands of an inch to cause crank whip???? don't think so, maybe 5 or 8 thou.....

Sorry, a search here on BMW jets came up zero...can you point me somewhere else?

<EDIT> OK I found it. We used to do the piston crown cooling a different way as we found this method has it's problems but this would be unlikely to have anything to do with the premature bearing failure.

Edited by mowog on 11th Dec, 2009.


mowog

72 Posts
Member #: 6792
Advanced Member



On 11th Dec, 2009 PaulH said:



On 11th Dec, 2009 mowog said:

Considering that the centre main copped it the worst, I'd guess (at this stage) that the oid centrufuged from the main by over-feeding 2 and 3 Big ends at higher RPM


I'm sorry but that just does not wash with me I mean the Centre main is what feeds oil to the crank which in turn feeds 2 and 3 big end surly the oil is going to first oil the main bearing be four entering the 6mm drilling in the crank and centrefuge out to 2 and 3 big end :$


The oil is being centrufuged away from the mains and the centre main is going to be first to suffer since 2 big ends are being fed from the one main.

Edited by mowog on 11th Dec, 2009.


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 11th Dec, 2009 PaulH said:



On 11th Dec, 2009 mowog said:

Considering that the centre main copped it the worst, I'd guess (at this stage) that the oid centrufuged from the main by over-feeding 2 and 3 Big ends at higher RPM


I'm sorry but that just does not wash with me I mean the Centre main is what feeds oil to the crank which in turn feeds 2 and 3 big end surly the oil is going to first oil the main bearing be four entering the 6mm drilling in the crank and centrefuge out to 2 and 3 big end :$


The theory as I understand it is that the oil supply to the center main bearing as X, and the oil demand of the center main bearing as Y with the oil demand of the big ends as Z. If X excedes YZ all bearings will be lubricated to a degree. If X is less than or only achieves YZ, the centrafuge effect of the rotating crankshaft draws all oil away from the center bearing. That is how I understand it.

I have been thinking about increasing the bore size of the center main oil feed, in an effort to increase the oil flow to the center bearing. Im not talking much, perhaps another 0.5mm diameter.

Im not going to get into a long drawn out explanation of my thoughts as to why whirl/ whip might be other than it appears to be a complex subject that MOWOG appears to know a lot about and is not giving much away.

There may well be other contributing factors such as the fluctuating oil pressures I have been experiencing, no real answer as to why. Increased bearing clearancies will increase oil demand and if the standard 55psi oil pressure at sustained 7krpm cannot supply enough oil for the demand, something will run dry.

One thing I am sure of is that MOWOG has not done any perforamce engine builds on an MPI block where the oil pressure regulating valve is off No3 main bearing gallery. That in itself could have dramatic effects on how the whole oil feed system operates, and I have an idea to work on that too. It might not be a major problem, as there are a few Miglia engines out there that survive long durations of high rpm without failure.

One other thing I am not happy with is the Jokespeed flywheel which needed a considerable amount removing from it to balance. There may still be some imbalance causing crank vibration and hence resulting in that whippy whirly thing on the center main. I don't know. RTS in the pipeline.

This is all an experiment for me, and I am doing my own testing. Nothing better than experience, but sometimes its nice to have a helping hand along the way. There are people out there who have seen this and done that (MOWOG) and wont give you the real information you are after, as that sort of knowledge is power, and we all like to feel we are better than every one else at some point in our lives, which doesnt help those with the real problems. I have been guilty of that.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

On 11th Dec, 2009 mowog said:


Also, I'm sure that you do know what you are doing, however what type of engine lube did you use on assembly and did you crank it over to get oil presure before starting it after your rebuild?



I built the engine dry, put it in that car, fitted an oil filter, filled the engine with oil, fired it up, and then watched the oil pressure build over 2 minuits

Edited by Sprocket on 12th Dec, 2009.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook




On 11th Dec, 2009 mowog said:

it shouldn't cause any undue crank flex' not that it will reduce it. Especially with 998 cranks. They are short stroke and the mains / big end overlap so this actually makes them quite stout and stiff.


This is a 'long' stroke 1275

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


mowog

72 Posts
Member #: 6792
Advanced Member




On 12th Dec, 2009 Sprocket said:
On 11th Dec, 2009 mowog said:


Also, I'm sure that you do know what you are doing, however what type of engine lube did you use on assembly and did you crank it over to get oil presure before starting it after your rebuild?



I built the engine dry, put it in that car, fitted an oil filter, filled the engine with oil, fired it up, and then watched the oil pressure build over 2 minuits


Just wanted to put it out there as I have seen it before. As I say and I'm NOT taking the piss, it really does appear that you do know what you are doing.....


mowog

72 Posts
Member #: 6792
Advanced Member




On 12th Dec, 2009 Sprocket said:



On 11th Dec, 2009 mowog said:

it shouldn't cause any undue crank flex' not that it will reduce it. Especially with 998 cranks. They are short stroke and the mains / big end overlap so this actually makes them quite stout and stiff.


This is a 'long' stroke 1275


Sorry here mate, it was a long thread to read through. This does change things. We would normally put restrictors in the crank, however I see your considering enlarging the Centre Main Feed?? Looking at the pics of the bearing shells, it really ran dry, to the extreme. I would suggest that your idea here is a good one, however I think you need to go quite a bit more than 0.5mm bigger, I would suggest in terms of 1.5 to 2mm. I would suggest that you would still need the restictors.

Regarding the whip the figures from your first post don't really lend themselves to having the HP to cause the sort of whip needed to do this to the centre main. I would also suggest the the oil presure fluctuations that you observed and this failure are interlinked.


Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

How much 'whip' is considered satisfactory.

The crank flexes, I had the pistons touch the head when the bearing failed. I am not convinced the crank does not flex with a propper bearing clearance, et alone with a slightly larger clearance.

I am not clever enough to prove otherwise, and I will just have to take your word and experience that its not an issue and look for an answer else where.

How many other center main failures have gone un solved? I think Paul Wiginton suffed this without reason.

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

Yes I did, last year. New shells before Avon and they were knackered by MITP with no road miles. It had very good oil pressure etc, I only knew something was up as it wouldnt rev past 8,000 as quickly as previous.
I showed them to Steve at MED who I bought them from and he said if it was anyone other than me he'd think it was debris damage but he knows what a fussy engine builder I am so it must be a bad bearing.

Paul

I seriously doubt it!


John

User Avatar

10022 Posts
Member #: 1456
Mongo

Barnsley, South Flatcapshire

On 12th Dec, 2009 Sprocket said:
I am not clever enough to prove otherwise, and I will just have to take your word and experience that its not an issue and look for an answer else where.


Don't be too hard on your self Sprocket.

If something is worth doing, it's worth doing half of.


Vegard

User Avatar

7765 Posts
Member #: 74
I pick holes in everything..

Chief ancient post excavator

Norway

Sprox: Is this crank crossdrilled?

On 13th Jul, 2012 Ben H said:
Mine gets in the way a bit, but only when it is up. If it is down it does not cause a problem.



Sprocket

User Avatar

11046 Posts
Member #: 965
Post Whore

Preston On The Brook

yes

On 26th Oct, 2004 TurboDave16v said:
Is it A-Series only? I think it should be...
So when some joey comes on here about how his 16v turbo vauxhall is great compared to ours, he can be given the 'bird'...


On 26th Oct, 2004 Tom Fenton said:
Yep I agree with TD........

Home > Help Needed / General Tech Chat > Wiped center main bearing
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests) <- Prev   Next ->
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: