Page:
Home > General Chat > Rear tracking / camber

1380turbo

User Avatar

365 Posts
Member #: 1211
Senior Member

Working up the BHP ladder.

Anyone give me some good starting figures for the rear setup?

Was thinking of going 0.5 degree negative with 0.5 degrees toe-in?


turbominivanman

User Avatar

1105 Posts
Member #: 1504
Post Whore

Westbury, Wiltshire

0.5 degrees negative camber and 3.2 mm toe in seems to work well for me (not sure what that mm figure equates to in degrees toe).

I take the camber to 1.5 degrees negative and use 1.6 mm toe out on the front.

Richard.

Minivanless, but reluctantly happy living with the decision. There'll be another one day.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=minimadmotorman#p/u


sid

55 Posts
Member #: 6376
Advanced Member

oxon

i think the rear toe in is recomended at 0 for road cars and about 1/8 of a inch for track cars.


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

3.2mm toe in is standard on the rear but I run mine parallel and you can notice the difference in a straight line, though it becomes a little skittish and takes getting used to.

Paul

I seriously doubt it!


1380turbo

User Avatar

365 Posts
Member #: 1211
Senior Member

Working up the BHP ladder.

Thats great Paul thanks, i will use those figures as a starting point. Running the back parallel must make things interesting *oh well*


Prawn

User Avatar

667 Posts
Member #: 5232
Post Whore

basingstoke

I had a bent rear beam for a while, and it was running parallel/slightly toe out on both sides unevenly, it made the car terrifying to drive!

Mr. Prawn, the friendly Crustacean- slowly making steps towards forced induction.


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

see this is a old post but do not want to open a new one. was installing my suspension the other day and got up this morning to set the tracking. had a problem with the rear that on one side i could get 1.4 degrees of neg camber while the other side only whent to 0.5 tops. but reading this 0.5 should be enough for the rear then?

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018


Carlzilla

User Avatar

3673 Posts
Member #: 9300
Post Whore

Quarry Bonk

Yeah, you don't need much at all on the rear. You have to consider as well on standard suspension with no play just how much positive camber the rears have you need to cancel out before you get to 0 degrees lol.

On 26th Jan, 2012 Tom Fenton said:
ring problems are down to wear or abuse but although annoying it isn't a show stopper

On 5th Aug, 2014 madmk1 said:
Shit the bed! I had snapped the end of my shaft off!!

17.213 @ 71mph, 64bhp n/a (Old Engine)


paul wiginton
Forum Mod

User Avatar

5933 Posts
Member #: 784
9 times Avon Park Class C winner

Milton Keynes

First make sure your floor is perfectly flat, this will dramatically effect your readings

I seriously doubt it!


Rammie2000

User Avatar

1751 Posts
Member #: 10190
Post Whore

belgium

i set a level on the subframe and added spacers under the wheels to get it level. but its good to read that its normal ( to have so less) i rememberd my old mans simca ralley 1000 having 2 degrees of camber (was rear wheel drive and only for track use)

you can do anything if you set your mind to it...
i rather blow it up winning than keep it together losing.

finish date set for project 1... march 2018

Home > General Chat > Rear tracking / camber
Users viewing this thread: none. (+ 1 Guests)  
To post messages you must be logged in!
Username: Password:
Page: